The changing face of mastectomy: An oncologic and cosmetic perspective

Cancer Control

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 286-294

  Laronga, Christine ^a   Lewis, Jaime D ^a   Smith, Paul D ^b  

^a H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL STUDY; DISTANT METASTASIS; ESTHETICS; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HISTORY; HUMAN; MASTECTOMY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; NIPPLE SPARING MASTECTOMY; ONCOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; SAFETY; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TUMOR RECURRENCE;

EID: 84867131814     PISSN: 10732748     EISSN: 15262359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107327481201900405     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Wagner FB, Martin RG, Bland KI. History of the therapy of breast disease. In: Bland KI, Copeland EM, eds. The Breast: Comprehensive Management of Benign and Malignant Diseases. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1991:1-18.
2. Olson JS, ed. Bathsheba's Breast. Women, Cancer, & History. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press; 2002:9-45.
3. Haagensen CD, ed. Carcinoma of the Breast. New York, NY: American Cancer Society; 1950.
4. Lacour J, Bucalossi P, Cacers E, et al. Radical mastectomy versus radical mastectomy plus internal mammary dissection: fi ve-year results of an international cooperative study. Cancer. 1976;37(1):206-214.
5. Patey DH, Dyson WH. The prognosis of carcinoma of the breast in relation to the type of operation performed. Br J Cancer. 1948;2(1):7-13.
6. Freeman BS. Subcutaneous mastectomy for benign breast lesions with immediate or delayed prosthetic replacement. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. 1962;30:676-682.
7. Freeman BS. Complications of subcutaneous mastectomy with prosthetic replacement, immediate or delayed. South Med J. 1967;60(12):1277-1280.
8. Cucin RL, Guthrie RH Jr, Luterman A, et al. Transplantation of the cryopreserved nipple-areolar complex. Ann Plast Surg. 1980;4(5):391-395.
9. Rose JH Jr. Carcinoma in a transplanted nipple. Arch Surg. 1980;115(9): 1131-1132.
10. Allison AB, Howorth MG Jr. Carcinoma in a nipple preserved by heterotopic auto-implantation. N Engl J Med. 1978;298(20):1132.
11. Wellisch DK, Schain WS, Noone RB, Little JW 3rd. The psychological contribution of nipple addition in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987; 80(5):699-704.
12. Toth BA, Lappert P. Modifi ed skin incisions for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87(6): 1048-1053.
13. Newman LA, Kuerer HM, Hunt KK, et al. Presentation, treatment, and outcome of local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 1998;5(7):620-626.
14. Carlson GW, Bostwick J 3rd, Styblo TM, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy: oncologic and reconstructive considerations. Ann Surg. 1997;225(5):570-578.
15. Fersis N, Hoenig A, Relakis K, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immedi- ate breast reconstruction: incidence of recurrence in patients with invasive breast cancer. Breast. 2004;13(6):488-493.
16. Greenway RM, Schlossberg L, Dooley WC. Fifteen-year series of skin-sparing mastectomy for stage 0 to 2 breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2005;190(6):918-922.
17. Kroll SS, Khoo A, Singletary SE, et al. Local recurrence risk after skinsparing and conventional mastectomy: a 6-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104(2):421-425.
18. Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Tadjalli HE, et al. Risk of recurrence after treatment of early breast cancer with skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;4(3):193-197.
19. Barton FE Jr, English JM, Kingsley WB, Fietz M. Glandular excision in total glandular mastectomy and modifi ed radical mastectomy: a comparison. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;88 (3):389-394.
20. Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R, et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985;312(11): 665-673.
21. Laronga C, Kemp B, Johnston D, et al. The incidence of occult nippleareola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6(6):609-613.
22. Simmons RM, Brennan M, Christos P, et al. Analysis of nipple/areolar involvement with mastectomy: can the areola be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9(2):165-168.
23. Lagios MD, Gates EA, Westdahl PR, et al. A guide to the frequency of nipple involvement in breast cancer: a study of 149 consecutive mastectomies using a serial subgross and correlated radiographic technique. Am J Surg. 1979;138(1):135-142.
24. Smith J, Payne WS, Carney JA. Involvement of the nipple and areola in carcinoma of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976;143(4):546-548.
25. Laronga C, Robb GL, Singletary SE. Feasibility of skin-sparing mastectomy with preservation of the nipple-areola complex. Breast Dis Yearb Q. 1998; 19(2):125-127.
26. Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in association with intra operative radiotherapy (ELIOT): a new type of mastectomy for breast cancer treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;96(1):47-51.
27. Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg. 2003;238(1):120-127.
28. Crowe JP Jr, Kim JA, Yetman R, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technique and results of 54 procedures. Arch Surg. 2004;139(2):148-150.
29. Hartmann LC, Schaid DJ, Woods JE, et al. Effi cacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a family history of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(2):77-84.
30. Rebbeck TR, Friebel T, Lynch HT, et al. Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy reduces breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(6):1055-1062.
31. Sookhan N, Boughey JC, Walsh MF, Degnim AC. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: initial experience at a tertiary center. Am J Surg. 2008;196(4):575-577.
32. Voltura AM, Tsangaris TN, Rosson GD, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: critical assessment of 51 procedures and implications for selection criteria. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(12):3396-3401.
33. Garwood ER, Moore D, Ewing C, et al. Total skin-sparing mastectomy: complications and local recurrence rates in 2 cohorts of patients. Ann Surg. 2009;249(1):26-32.
34. Spear SL, Hannan CM, Willey SC, Cocilovo C. Nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123(6):1665-1673.
35. Garcia-Etienne CA, Borgen PI. Update on the indications for nipple-sparing mastectomy. J Support Oncol. 2006;4(5):225-230.
36. de Alcantara Filho P, Capko D, Barry JM, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(11):3117-3122.
37. Kiluk JV, Santillan AA, Kaur P, et al. Feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy through an inframammary incision for a nipple-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;15 (12):3402-3406.
38. Benediktsson KP, Perbeck L. Survival in breast cancer after nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants: a prospective trial with 13 years median follow-up in 216 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34(2):143-148.
39. Gerber B, Krause A, Dieterich M, et al. The oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction: an extended follow-up study. Ann Surg. 2009;249(3):461-468.
40. Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy with nipple areola intraoperative radiotherapy: one thousand and one cases of a fi ve years experience at the European Institute of Oncology of Milan (EIO). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;117(2):333-338.
41. Petit JY. Nipple-sparing mastectomy with nipple areola intra-operative radiotherapy: one thousand and one cases of a fi ve years experience at the European Institute of Oncology of Milan (EIO). Oral presentation at the 33rd Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; December 8-12, 2010; San Antonio, Texas.
42. Veronesi U. Progress in breast cancer management. Oral presentation at the 16th Annual Multidisciplinary Symposium on Breast Disease; February 10-13, 2011; Amelia Island, FL.
43. Jensen JA, Orringer JS, Giuliano AE. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in 99 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(6):1665-1670.
44. Stolier AJ, Sullivan SK, Dellacroce FJ. Technical considerations in nipplesparing mastectomy: 82 consecutive cases without necrosis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(5):1341-1347.
45. Salgarello M, Visconti G, Barone-Adesi L. Nipple-sparing mastecomy with immediate implant reconstruction: cosmetic outcomes and technical refi nements. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(5):1460-1471.
46. Davies K, Allan L, Roblin P, et al. Factors aff ecting post-operative complications following skin sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Breast. 2011;20(1):21-25.
47. Yueh JH, Houlihan MJ, Slavin SA, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: evaluation of patient satisfaction, aesthetic results, and sensation. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;62(5):586-590.
48. Djohan R, Gage E, Gatherwright J, et al. Patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an 8-year outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(3):818-829.
49. Wagner JL, Fearmonti R, Hunt KK, et al. Prospective evaluation of the nipple-areola complex sparing mastectomy for risk reduction and for early-stage breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(4):1137-1144