Scholarly reading and the value of academic library collections: Results of a study in six UK universities

Insights: the UKSG Journal

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 130-149

  Tenopir, Carol ^a   Volentine, Rachel ^a   King, Donald W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867126824     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20487754     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1629/2048-7754.25.2.130     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Tenopir, C and Volentine, R, UK Scholarly Reading and the Value of Library Resources: Summary Results of the Study Conducted Spring 2011 Study on behalf of JISC Collections, 2012: http://www.jisc-collections.ac.uk/Reports/ ukscholarlyreadingreport/ (accessed 24 April 2012).
2. Tenopir, C and King, D W, Towards Electronic Journals: Realities for Scientist, Librarians and Publishers, 2000, Washington DC, Special Libraries Association.
3. Tenopir, C, Wilson, S, Vakkari, P, Talja, S and King, D W, Cross Country Comparison of Scholarly E-Reading Patterns in Australia, Finland and the United States, Australian Academic & Research Libraries (AARL), 2010, 41(1), 26-41.
4. Tenopir, C and King, D W, ref. 2.
5. King, D W and Tenopir, C, Using and Reading Scholarly Literature. In: Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 34, Ed. Williams, M, 2001, Medford, NJ, Information Today, Inc.
6. Healy, L W, Dagar, L and Wilkie, K M, Custom Report Prepared for the Digital Library Federation/Council on Library and Information Resources, 2002, Burlingame, CA, Outsell.
7. Brown, C M, The Role of Electronic Preprints in Chemical Communication: Analysis of Citation, Usage and Acceptance in the Journal Literature, Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 2003, 54(5), 362-371.
8. Maughan, P D, Library Resources and Services: A Cross-Disciplinary Survey of Faculty and Graduate Student Use and Satisfaction, Journal of Academic Librarianship, 1999, 25(5), 354-366.
9. Research Information Network, The Value of Libraries for Research and Researchers, A RIN and RLUK Report, 2011.
10. Flanagan, J C, The Critical Incident Technique, Psychological Bulletin, 1954, 52(4), 327-358.
11. Bradford, M L, The Critical Incident Technique and the Qualitative Evaluation of the Connecting Libraries and Schools Projects, Library Trends, 2006, 55(1),46-64.
12. Andrews, J, The Use of the Critical Incident Research Technique in an Academic Library, Library & Information Research News, 1991, 14(50), 22-27.
13. Griffiths, J M and King, D W, A Manual on the Evaluation of Information Centers and Services: NATO, AGARD, 1991, New York, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
14. King, D W, Tenopir, C, Montgomery, C H and Aerni, S E, Patterns of Journal Use by Faculty at Three Diverse Universities, D-Lib Magazine, 2003, 9(10): http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october03/king/10king.html (accessed 24 April 2012).
15. Research Information Network, ref. 9.
16. Luther, J, University Investment in the Library: What's the Return? A Case Study at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Elsevier Library Connect White Paper, 2008: http://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/sites/default/ files/lcwp0101.pdf (accessed 24 April 2012).