Constitutional cultures, democracy, and unwritten principles

University of Illinois Law Review

Volumn 2012, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 683-710

  Goldsworthy, Jeffrey ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867117271     PISSN: 02769948     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (64)

1. Jack M. Balkin, Living Originalism 6-7 (2011).
2. Dawn Oliver, The United Kingdom, in How Constitutions Change: A Comparative Study 329 (Dawn Oliver & Carlo Fusaro eds., 2011)
3. Paul Rishworth, New Zealand, in HOW CONSTITUTIONS CHANGE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY, at 235.
4. Anthony Mason, The Australian Constitution in Retrospect and Prospect, in Reflections ON THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION 7,8 (Robert French et al. eds., 2003).
5. Stephen Donaghue, The Clamour of Silent Constitutional Principles, 24 FED. L. REV. 133,146 n.87 (1996)
6. Janelle Greenberg, The Radical Face of the Ancient Constitution: St. Edward's "Laws" in Early Modern Political Thought 3-4 (2001)
7. J.G.A. Pocock, The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law: A Study of English Historical Thought in the Seventeenth Century 14-15 (1987).
8. Jeffrey Goldsworthy, The Constitutional Protection of Rights in Australia, in Australian Federation: Towards the Second Century 151, 151-57 (Gregory Craven ed., 1992).
9. PROTECTING RIGHTS WITHOUT A BILL OF RIGHTS: INSTITUTIONAL PERFORMANCE AND Reform in Australia (Tom Campbell et al. eds., 2006).
10. George Williams, Constructing a Community-Based Bill of Rights, in PROTECTING Human Rights: Instruments and Institutions 247 (Tom Campbell et al. eds., 2003).
11. Parliament: The Vision in Hindsight (G. Lindell & R. Bennett eds., 2001).
12. Cheryl Saunders, The Constitution of Australia: A Contextual Analysis 76 (2011).
13. Jeffrey Goldsworthy, The Case for Originalism, in THE CHALLENGE OF ORIGINAUSM: Theories of Constitutional Interpretation 42, 51-57
14. Jeffrey Goldsworthy, Constitutional Interpretation: Originalism, 4 PHIL. COMPASS, 682, 687-88 (2009)
15. Jeffrey Goldsworthy, Interpreting the Constitution in Its Second Century, Melb. U. L. Rev. 677, 686-87 (2000)
16. Jeffrey Goldsworthy, Original Meanings and Contemporary Understandings in Constitutional Interpretation, in CONSTTrUTIONAL ADVANCEMENT IN A FROZEN CONTINENT: ESSAYS IN HONOUR OF GEORGE Winterton 245, 248 (HP Lee & Peter Gerangelos eds., 2009)
17. Jeffrey Goldsworthy, Originalism in Constitutional Interpretation, 25 FED. L. REV. 1,38-39 (1997).
18. Parliament: The Vision in Hindsight (G. Lindell & R. Bennett eds., 2001). See also infra note 104.
19. Cheryl Saunders, The Constitution of Australia: A Contextual Analysis 76 (2011).
20. Jeffrey Goldsworthy, The Case for Originalism, in THE CHALLENGE OF ORIGINAUSM: Theories of Constitutional Interpretation 42, 51-57 (Grant Huscroft & Bradley W. Miller eds., 2011)
21. Jeffrey Goldsworthy, Constitutional Interpretation: Originalism, 4 PHIL. COMPASS, 682, 687-88 (2009)
22. Jeffrey Goldsworthy, Interpreting the Constitution in Its Second Century, Melb. U. L. Rev. 677, 686-87 (2000)
23. Jeffrey Goldsworthy, Original Meanings and Contemporary Understandings in Constitutional Interpretation, in CONSTTrUTIONAL ADVANCEMENT IN A FROZEN CONTINENT: ESSAYS IN HONOUR OF GEORGE Winterton 245, 248 (HP Lee & Peter Gerangelos eds., 2009)
24. Jeffrey Goldsworthy, Originalism in Constitutional Interpretation, 25 FED. L. REV. 1,38-39 (1997).
25. John Hart Ely, The Apparent Inevitability of Mixed Government, 16 CONST. COMMENT. 283, 291-92 (1999).
26. Australian Constitution s 128.
27. The Australian equivalent, s 128
28. Australian Constitution s 128.
29. Peter W. Hogg, Canada: From Privy Council to Supreme Court, in INTERPRETING Constitutions: A Comparative Study 55 (Jeffrey Goldsworthy ed., 2006).
30. BRUCE Ackerman, We THE PEOPLE: Foundations 266-69 (1991)
31. H.L.A. HART, THE CONCEPT OF LAW ch. 7 (1961)
32. Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously ch. 4 (1977).
33. Randy E. Barnett, The Misconceived Assumption About Constitutional Assumptions, 103 Nw. U.L. REV. 615, 622-26 (2009)
34. Lawrence B. Solum, Semantic Originalism 58, 74-75
35. Univ. of 111. Coll. of Law, 111. Pub. Law and Legal Theory Research Papers Series No. 07-24, 2008), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=l 120244.
36. Paul Grice, Studies in the Way of words 24-30,138-43,269-82 (1989).
37. Jeffrey Goldsworthy, Implications in Language, Law and the Constitution, in FUTURE Directions in Australian Constitutional Law: essays in Honour of Professor Leslie ZlNES 150,164-68 (Geoffrey Lindell ed., 1994).
38. Felix Frankfurter, Some Reflections on the Reading of Statutes, 47 COLUM. L. REV. 527, 533 (1947).
39. Dan Sperber & Deirdre Wilson, Pragmatics, in THE OXFORD HANDBOOK OF CONTEMPORARY PHILOSOPHY 468, 477
40. Frank Jackson & Michael Smith eds., 2005.
41. Andrei Marmor, The Immorality of Textualism, 38 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 2063,2065-66 (2005)
42. John R. Searle, Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech acts 126-28 (1979).
43. F.A.R. Bennion, Statutory Interpretation: A Code 602-03 (2d ed. 1992).
44. R v. Tolson, [1889] 23 Q.B.D. 168,187 (Eng.)
45. Lord Diplock's opinion in Sweet v. Parsley, [1970] A.C. 132 (H.L.) 162-63
46. Victoria v Commonwealth (1971) 122 CLR 353,393,403 (Austl.) (Windeyer, J.).
47. Martin H. Redish & Shane V. Nugent, The Dormant Commerce Clause and the Constitutional Balance of Federalism, 1987 DUKE L.J. 569,571.
48. Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Two Ways to Derive Implied Constitutional Rights, in LEGAL INTERPRETATION IN DEMOCRATIC STATES 231, 234-36 (Jeffrey Goldsworthy & Tom Campbell eds., 2002).
49. John F. Manning, Federalism and the Generality Problem in Constitutional Interpretation, 122 Harv. L. Rev. 2003, 2004-05 (2009)
50. Jeffrey Goldsworthy, The Limits of Judicial Fidelity to Law: The Coxford Lecture, 24 Can. J.L. & Juris. 305,312 (2011).
51. Elisabeth Peden, Good Faith in the Performance of Contracts 60-71 (2003).
52. Slipper Island Resort Ltd. v Minister of Works & Dev. [1981] 1 NZLR 136 (CA) 139
53. J.G. Starke et al., Cheshire & Fifoot's Law of Contract 212-13 (6th Australian ed. 1992)
54. Charles l. Black, Jr., Structure and Relationship in Constitutional Law 39-45 (1969)).
55. William G. Buss, Alexander Meiklejohn, American Constitutional Law, and Australia's Implied Freedom of Political Communication, 34 Fed. L. Rev. 421 (2006).
56. Australian Capital Television Pty. Ltd. v Commonwealth (1992) 177 CLR 106 (Austl.)
57. Nationwide News Pty. Ltd. v Wills (1992) 177 CLR 1 (Austl.).
58. Gerald N. Rosenberg & John M. Williams, Do Not Go Gently into That Good Right: The First Amendment in the High Court of Australia, 1997 SUP. CT. REV. 439.
59. Jeffrey Goldsworthy, Constitutional Implications Revisited, 30 U. QUEENSLAND L.J. 9 (2011).
60. Attorney-Gen. (Cth) ex rel. McKinlay v Commonwealth (1975) 135 CLR 1 (Austl.).
61. Australian Communist Party v Commonwealth (1951) 83 CLR 1 (Austl.).
62. Miller v TCN Channel Nine Ply. Ltd. (1986) 161 CLR 556 (Austl.).
63. Australian Capital Television Pty. Ltd. v Commonwealth (1992) 177 CLR 106 (Austl.)
64. Theophanous v Herald & Weekly Times Ltd. (1994) 182 CLR 104 (Austl.)