Sequential modulation of cue use in the task switching paradigm

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 3, Issue AUG, 2012, Pages

  Wendt, Mike ^a   Luna Rodriguez, Aquiles ^a   Reisenauer, Renate ^b   Jacobsen, Thomas ^a   Dreisbach, Gesine ^b  

^a HELMUT SCHMIDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cue validity; Preparation; Sequential modulation; Task switching

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867113204     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00287     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., and Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol. Rev. 108, 624-652.
2. Dreisbach, G., and Haider, H. (2006). Preparatory adjustment of cognitive control in the task switching paradigm. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 13, 334-338.
3. Dreisbach, G., Haider, H., and Kluwe, R. H. (2002). Preparatory processes in the task-switching paradigm: evidence from the use of probability cues. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 28, 468-483.
4. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., and Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. J. Exp. Psy-chol. Gen. 121, 480-506.
5. Hübner, M., Dreisbach, G., Haider, H., and Kluwe, R. H. (2003). Backward inhibition as a means of sequential task-set control: evidence for reduction of task competition. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 29, 289-297.
6. Hübner, M., Kluwe, R. H., Luna-Rodriguez, A., and Peters, A. (2004a). Task preparation and stimulus-evoked competition. Acta Psychol. (Amst) 115, 211-34.
7. Hübner, M., Kluwe, R. H., Luna-Rodriguez, A., and Peters, A. (2004b). Response selection difficulty and asymmetrical costs of switching between tasks and stimuli: no evidence for an exogenous component of task-set reconfiguration. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 30, 1043-1063.
8. Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., and Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching -a review. Psychol. Bull. 136, 849-874.
9. Kuhns, D., Lien, M.-C., and Ruthruff, E. (2007). Proactive versus reactive task-set inhibition: evidence from flanker compatibility effects. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 14, 977-983.
10. Li, K. Z., and Dupuis, K. (2008). Attentional switching in the sequential flanker task: age, location, and time course effects. Acta Psychol. (Amst) 127, 416-27.
11. Mayr, U. (2007). "Inhibition of task sets," in Inhibition in Cognition, eds G. David and C. M. MacLeod (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association), 27-44.
12. Mayr, U., and Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on Action: the role of backward inhibition. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 129, 4-26.
13. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 22, 1423-1442.
14. Ruthruff, E., Remington, R. W., and Johnston, J. C. (2001). Switching between simple cognitive tasks: the interaction of top-down and bottom-up factors. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27, 1404-1419.