Basic land security and livelihood: A study of compensation and social security policy for land-expropriated peasants in china

Public Administration and Development

Volumn 32, Issue 4-5, 2012, Pages 385-401

  Yang, Yi fan ^a  

^a SOUTHWEST JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Compensation for land expropriation; Minimum social assistance; Pro poor land policy; Social security policy

Indexed keywords

HUMAN RIGHTS; LAND MANAGEMENT; MILLENIUM DEVELOPMENT GOAL; POLICY MAKING; POVERTY ALLEVIATION; SOCIAL POLICY; SOCIAL SECURITY; URBAN PLANNING;

CHINA;

EID: 84867112131     PISSN: 02712075     EISSN: 1099162X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pad.1615     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Alchian A, Demsetz H. 1973. The property right paradigm. The Journal of Economic History 33: 16-27.
2. Behring K, Helbrecht I. 2002. Wohneigentum in Europa (Real Estate in Europe). Wüstenrot Stiftung: Ludwigsburg.
3. Bromley DW. 2008. Land and economic development. In Toward a Vision of Land in 2015: International Perspectives, Cornia G, Riddell J (eds). Cambridge MA: Lincoln Institute for Land Policy: 217-236.
4. Buitelaar E. 2004. A transaction-cost analysis of the land development process. Urban Studies 41 (13): 2539-2553.
5. Buitelaar E. 2007. The cost of land use decisions: applying transaction cost economics to planning and development. Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK.
6. Coase R. 1990. The Firm, the Market and the Law. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
7. Cooter R, Ulen T. 2004. Law and Economics (4th edn). Addison Wesley: MA, USA.
8. De Soto H. 2000. The Mystery of Capital. Bantam Press/Random House: London.
9. Deininger K, Jin S. 2003. The impact of property rights on households' investment, risk coping, and policy preferences: evidence from China. Economic Development and Cultural Change 51(4): 851-82.
10. Deininger K, Songqing J. 2006. Tenure security and land-related investment: evidence from Ethiopia. European Economic Review 50(5): 1245-1277.
11. Evans AW. 2004. Economics, real estate and the supply of land. Blackwell Publishing Ltd: Oxford, UK.
12. Gould KA. 2006. Land regularization on agricultural frontiers: the case of northwestern Petén, Guatemala. Land Use Policy (23): 395-407.
13. Gould K, Carter D, Shrestha R. 2006. Extra-legal land market dynamics on a Guatemalan agricultural frontier: implications for neoliberal land policies. Land Use Policy (23): 408-420.
14. Guo X-M. 2006. Zhong Xi Bu Di Qu Tong Chou Cheng Xiang Fa Zhan De Li Lun Yu Shi Jian Yan Jiu. Soft scientific research report issued to Ministry of Agriculture of PRC.
15. Han J. 2004. Dang Qian Nong Ye He Nong Cun Jing Ji Xing Shi Yu Zheng Ce Zou Xiang Development (Fa Zhan) 4: 2-6.
16. Ho P, Spoor M. 2006. Whose land? The political economy of land titling in transition economies. Land Use Policy, Special Issue, edited by Peter Ho and Max Spoor 23(4): 580-87.
17. Ikejiofor U. 2006. Equity in informal land delivery: insights from Enugu, Nigeria. Land Use Policy (23): 448-459.
18. Khemro BHS, Payne G. 2004. Improving tenure security for the urban poor in Phnom Penh, Cambodia: an analytical case study. Habitat International 28: 181-201.
19. Lai LW. 2005. Neo-institutional economics and planning theory. Planning Theory 4(1): 7-19.
20. Larbi WO, Antwi A, Olomolaiye P. 2004. Compulsory land acquisition in Ghana-policy and praxis. Land Use Policy 21(2): 115-27.
21. Leckie S. 2003. Housing and Property Restitution: A Comparative Study. Transnational Publishers: New York.
22. Li J-G, Han J. 2004. Jie Jue Wo Guo Xin Jie Duan 'San Nong' Wen Ti De Zheng Ce Si Lu. Reform (Gai Ge) 4: 5-12.
23. Lin T-C. 2005. Land assembly in a fragmented land market through land readjustment. Land Use Policy 22: 95-102.
24. Lippit VD. 1974. Land Reform and Economic Development in China: A Study of Institutional Change and Development Finance. International Arts and Sciences Press: White Plain, NY.
25. Miceli TJ, et al 2002. Title systems and land values. Journal of Law and Economics 45(2): 565-82.
26. Mooya MM, Cloete CE. 2007. Informal urban property markets and poverty alleviation: a conceptual framework. Urban Studies (44): 147-165.
27. Needham B. 2006. Planning, Law and Economics: The Rules We Make for Using Land. Routledge: London.
28. Niroula GS, Thapa GB. 2005. Impacts and causes of land fragmentation, and lessons learned from land consolidation in South Asia. Land Use Policy 22: 358-372.
29. Payne G (ed). 2002. Land, Rights and Innovation: Improving Tenure Security for the Urban Poor. London: ITDG Publishing.
30. Payne G. 2004. Land tenure and property rights. Habitat International 28: 167-179.
31. Platteau J. 1996. The evolutionary theory of land rights as applied to Sub-Saharan Africa: a critical assessment. Development and Change 27: 29-86.
32. Porio E, Crisol C. 2004. Property rights, security of tenure and the urban poor in Metro Manila. Habitat International 26(2004): 203-219.
33. Sikor T. 2006. Community-based forestry in the developing world: analyses from an agrarian perspective. Forest Policy and Economics 8(4): 339-349.
34. Sjaastad E, Cousins B. 2008. Formalization of land rights in the South: an overview. Land Use Policy 26: 1-9.
35. Unruh J. 2002. Poverty and property rights in the developing world: not as simple as we would like. Land Use Policy 19: 275-276.
36. Webster C, Lai LW. 2003. Property Rights, Planning and Markets: Managing Spontaneous Cities. Edward Elgar: London.