Comparative study of same sitting hybrid coronary artery revascularization versus off-pump coronary artery bypass in multivessel coronary artery disease

Journal of Interventional Cardiology

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 460-468

  Bachinsky, William B ^a   Abdelsalam, Murad ^a   Boga, Gouthami ^a   Kiljanek, Lukasz ^a   Mumtaz, Mubashir ^a   McCarty, Christine ^a  

^a Harrisburg Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY RECANALIZATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; GRAFT PATENCY; HOSPITAL COST; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; OFF PUMP CORONARY SURGERY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL RISK; THORACOTOMY; TRANSFUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS, OFF-PUMP; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY VESSELS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84867101144     PISSN: 08964327     EISSN: 15408183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2012.00752.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Mueller RL, Rosengart TK, Isom OW,. The history of surgery for ischemic heart disease. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63: 869-878.
2. Mohan R, Amsel BJ, Walter PJ,. Coronary artery bypass grafting in the elderly: A review of studies on patients older than 64, 69 or 74 years. Cardiology 2002; 80: 215-225.
3. LaPietra A, Grossi EA, Derivaux CC, et al,. Robotic-assisted instruments enhance minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70: 835-838.
4. King SB, Smith SC, Hirshfeld JW, et al,. 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2008; 117: 261-295.
5. Etienne P, Glineur D, Papadatos S, et al,. Comparison of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery with implantation of drug-eluting stents in patients with left anterior descending coronary artery disease. Innovations 2009; 4 (6): 340-344.
6. Bonatti J, Lehr E, Vesely MR, et al,. Hybrid coronary revascularization-techniques and outcome. Eur Surg 2011; 43(4): 198-204.
7. Kon Z, Brown E, Tran R, et al,. Simultaneous hybrid coronary revascularization reduces postoperative morbidity compared with results from conventional off-pump coronary artery bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 135: 367-375.
8. Reicher B, Poston RS, Mehra MR, et al,. Simultaneous "hybrid" percutaneous coronary intervention and minimally invasive surgical bypass grafting: Feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes. Am Heart J 2008; 155 (4): 661-667.
9. Zhao D, Leacche M, Balaguer JM, et al,. Routine intraoperative completion angiography after coronary artery bypass grafting and 1-stop hybrid revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 69: 123-127.
10. Hu S, Li Q, Gao P, et al,. Simultaneous hybrid revascularization versus off-pump coronary artery bypass for multivessel coronary artery disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 91: 432-438.
11. Spertus JA, Winder JA, Dewhurst TA, et al,. Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina questionaire: A new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 333-341.
12. Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP, et al,. The SYNTAX score: An angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. Eurointervention 2005; 1: 219-227.
13. Edwards FH, Grover FL, Shroyer AL, et al., The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Surgery Database: Current risk assessment. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63: 903-908.
14. Mauri L, Hsieh WH, Massaro JM, et al., Stent thrombosis in randomized clinical trials of drug-eluting stents. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 1020-1029.
15. Fitzgibbon GM, Burton JR, Leach AJ, et al,. Coronary bypass graft fate: Angiographic grading of 1400 consecutive grafts early after operation and of 1132 after one year. Circulation 1978; 57 (6): 1070-1074.
16. Angelini GD, Wilde P, Salerno TA, et al., Integrated left small thoracotomy and angioplasty for multivessel coronary artery revascularization. Lancet 1996; 347: 757-758.
17. Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al,. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med 1986; 314: 1-6.
18. Desai ND, Cohen EA, Naylor CD, et al,. A randomized comparison of radial artery and saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2302-2309.
19. Yun KL, Wu Y, Aharonian V, et al,. Randomized trial of endoscopic versus open vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: Six-month patency rates. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 129: 496-503.
20. Wiemer M, Serrys P, Miquel-Hebert K, et al,. Five-year long-term clinical follow-up of the XIENCE V everolimus eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions: The SPIRIT FIRST trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 75: 997-1003.
21. Kappetein AP, Feldman TE, Mack MJ, et al,. Comparision of coronary bypass surgery with drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of left main and/or three-vessel disease: 3-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial. Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 2125-2134.
22. Diegeler A, Walther T, Metz S, et al,. Comparison of MIDCAB versus conventional CABG surgery regarding pain and quality of life. Heart Surg Forum 1999; 2 (4): 290-296.