Adaptive Transmission Control Protocol-trunking flow control mechanism for supporting proxy-assisted video on demand system

International Journal of Communication Systems

Volumn 25, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1363-1380

  Yu, Yuan Tse ^a   Tong, Sheau Ru ^b  

^a NATIONAL KAOHSIUNG NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL PINGTUNG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Internet video streaming; multithread download; video flow control

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE TRANSMISSION CONTROL; BEST-EFFORT SERVICES; CONTROL MECHANISM; CONTROL SCHEMES; HIGH THROUGHPUT; INTERNET VIDEO; MULTI-THREAD; MULTIMEDIA PRESENTATION; MULTIPLE TCP CONNECTIONS; NETWORK CONDITION; NETWORK STATE; SEGMENT-BASED; STABLE THROUGHPUT; STREAM CONTROL TRANSMISSION PROTOCOLS; TCP CONNECTIONS; TCP PROTOCOL; VIDEO TRANSMISSIONS; VIDEO-ON-DEMAND SYSTEM; WEB SERVERS;

FLOW CONTROL; HTTP; HYPERTEXT SYSTEMS; IMAGE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; INTERNET; MULTIMEDIA SERVICES; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); TRAFFIC CONGESTION; VIDEO STREAMING;

TRANSMISSION CONTROL PROTOCOL;

EID: 84867100223     PISSN: 10745351     EISSN: 10991131     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dac.1312     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Gettys J, Fielding R, Mogul J, Frystyk H, Masinter L, Leach P, Berners-Lee T,. RFC 2616-Hypertext Transfer Protocol-HTTP/1.1, Internet Engineering Task Force, February 1999. URL http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2616.html [1 December 2007].
2. Martin J, Nilsson A, Rhee I,. Delay-based congestion avoidance for TCP. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 2003; 11 (3): 356-369. DOI: 10.1109/TNET.2003.813038.
3. Kuschnig R, Kofler I, Hellwagner H,. Improving internet video streaming performance by parallel TCP-based request-response streams. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (IEEE CCNC 10). IEEE Press: Piscataway, NJ, 2010, DOI: 10.1109/CCNC.2010.5421815.
4. Wu G, Chong EK, Givan R,. Streaming stored video over AIMD transport protocols. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Multimedia Software Engineering. IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, 2002.
5. Zhao L, Jing Y, Dimirovski G,. Improvement of AIMD algorithm considering multimedia transfer over internet. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Telecommunications in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Service (TELSIKS). IEEE: New York, NY, 2003, DOI: 10.1109/TELSKS.2003.1246251.
6. Baldini A, Carli LD, Risso F,. Increasing performances of TCP data transfers through multiple parallel connections. In IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications. IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, 2009; 630-636. DOI: 10.1109/ISCC.2009.5202274.
7. Chakareski J, Frossard P,. Rate-distortion optimized distributed packet scheduling of multiple video streams over shared communication resources. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 2006; 8 (2): 207-218. DOI: 10.1109/TMM.2005.864284.
8. Nikolaus B, Ott J, Bormann C, Bormann U,. Reducing bandwidth consumption at startup of media transmissions. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting 2006; 52 (3): 368-373. DOI: 10.1109/TBC.2006.879864.
9. Ozcelebi T, Tekalp AM, Civanlar M,. Delay-distortion optimization for content-adaptive video streaming. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 2007; 9 (4): 826-836. DOI: 10.1109/TMM.2007.895670.
10. Stewart R, Xie Q, Morneault K, Sharp C, Schwarzbauer H, Taylor T, Rytina I, Kalla M, Zhang L, Paxson V,. RFC2960-Stream Control Transport Protocol, Internet Engineering Task Force, 2000. URL http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2960.html [20 December 2007].
11. Steinberg J, Pasquale J,. Improving HTTP-based video performance using network flow buffering. In IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC). IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, 2010, DOI: 10.1109/ISCC.2010. 5546807.
12. Schulzrinne H, Casner S, Frederick R, Jacobson V,. RFC1889-RTP: a transport protocol for real-time applications, Internet Engineering Task Force, 1996. URL http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1889.html.
13. Padhye J, Kurous D, Towsley R,. A model based TCP-friendly rate control protocol. The International Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video (NOSSDAV), 1999.
14. Tsao SC, Lai YC, Lin YD,. Taxonomy and evaluation of TCP-friendly congestion-control schemes on fairness, aggressiveness, and responsiveness. IEEE Network November 2007; 21 (6): 6-15.
15. Widmer J, Denda R, Mauve M,. A survey on TCP-friendly congestion control. IEEE Network 2001; 15 (3): 28-37.
16. Jourjon G, Lochin E, Dairaine L,. Optimization of TFRC loss history initialization. IEEE Communications Letters 2007; 11 (3): 276-278. DOI: 10.1109/LComm.2007.061707.
17. Rejaie R, Handley M, Estrin D,. RAP: an end-to-end rate-based congestion control mechanism for realtime streams in the internet. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications and Communications Societies. IEEE: New York, NY, 1999.
18. Chou P, Mohr A, Wang A, Mehrotra S,. Error control for receiver-driven layered multicast of audio and video. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 2001; 3 (1): 108-122. DOI: 10.1109/6046.909598.
19. Zhao L, Yamamoto H,. Multisource receiver-driven layered multicast. In Proceedings of the IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON). IEEE: New York, NY, 2005, DOI: 10.1109/TENCON.2005.301296.
20. McCanne S, Jacobson V, Vetterli M,. Receiver-driven layered multicast. In Conference Proceedings on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications. ACM: New York, NY, 1996.
21. Lai YC,. DCCP congestion control with virtual recovery to achieve TCP-fairness. IEEE Communications Letters 2008; 12 (1): 50-52. DOI: 10.1109/LCOMM.2008.071421.
22. Czekierda L, Grobelny T,. Framework for application-level adaptation of media streams transmitted using DCCP protocol. In IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communication. IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, 2009, DOI: 10.1109/ISCC.2009.5202275.
23. Lee KJ, Nam SS, Mun BI,. SCTP efficient flow control during handover. In Wireless Communication and Networking Conference. IEEE: New York, NY, 2006, DOI: 10.1109/WCNC.2006.1683443.
24. 3GPP TS 26.234 v9.3.0 (2010-06). 3rd generation partnership project; technical specification group services and system aspects; transparent end-to-end packet-switched streaming service (PSS); protocols and codecs (Release 9), section 12: adaptive HTTP streaming, 2010.
25. HTTP adaptive streaming, draft v0.06,7 June 2010.
26. (MPEG) IJSW. Dynamic adaptive streaming over http. w11578, CD 23001-6, w11578, CD 23001-6. ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 (MPEG), Guangzhou, China, 2010.
27. de la Fuente YS, Schierl T, Hellge C, Wiegand T, Hong D, Vleeschauwer DD, Leekwijck WV, loudec YL,. iDASH: improved dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP using scalable video coding. In Proceedings of the 2nd Annual ACM Conference on Multimedia Systems. ACM: New York, NY, 2011.
28. Yao J, Hossain I, Kanhere S, Hassan M,. Empirical evaluation of HTTP adaptive streaming under vehicular mobility. IFIP Networking 2011 Conference, Valencia, Spain, 2011.
29. Mller C, Timmerer C,. A test-bed for the dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP featuring session mobility. In Proceedings of the 2nd Annual ACM Conference on Multimedia Systems. ACM: New York, NY, 2011.
30. Akhshabi S, Begen AC, Dovrolis C,. An experimental evaluation of rate-adaptation algorithms in adaptive streaming over HTTP. In Proceedings of the 2nd Annual ACM Conference on Multimedia Systems. ACM: New York, 2011.
31. Van Deursen D, Van Lancker W, Van de Walle R,. On media delivery protocols in the web. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME). IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, 2010, DOI: 10.1109/ICME.2010.5582620.
32. Funasaka J,. Evaluation on parallel downloading method using HTTP over UDP. In International Symposium on Autonomous Decentralized Systems. IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, 2009, DOI: 10.1109/ISADS.2009.5207382.
33. Chen S, Shen B, Wee S, Zhang X,. Segment-based streaming media proxy: modeling and optimization. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 2006; 8 (2): 243-256.
34. Thyagharajan K, Ramachandran V,. Segmentation analysis for effective usage of network resources in video streaming. In International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Multimedia Applications. IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, 2007.
35. Ip AT, Jiangchuan L, Lui JCS,. COPACC: an architecture of cooperative proxy-client caching system for on-demand media streaming. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 2007; 18 (1): 70-83.
36. Jurca D, Frossard P,. Video packet selection and scheduling for multipath streaming. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 2007; 9 (3): 629-641. DOI: 10.1109/TMM.2006.888017.
37. Yoshihisa T, Tsukamoto M, Nishio S,. A scheduling protocol for continuous media data broadcasting with large-scale data segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting 2007; 53 (4): 780-788.
38. Stevens W,. TCP slow start, congestion avoidance, fast retransmit, and fast recovery algorithms. RFC 2001, Internet Engineering Task Force, January 1997.