A DDS-based middleware for quality-of-service and high-performance networked robotics

Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience

Volumn 24, Issue 16, 2012, Pages 1940-1952

  Cruz, Jesús Martínez ^a   Romero Garcés, Adrián ^a   Rubio, Juan Pedro Bandera ^a   Robles, Rebeca Marfil ^a   Bandera, Antonio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

Author keywords

data distribution service; middleware; performance; QoS; robotics

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; DISTRIBUTED DATABASE SYSTEMS; EDUCATIONAL ROBOTS; MIDDLEWARE; QUALITY OF SERVICE; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; ROBOT LEARNING; ROBOTICS; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

CONTROL ARCHITECTURE; DATA DISTRIBUTION SERVICES; LIGHTWEIGHT MIDDLEWARE; NETWORKED APPLICATIONS; PERFORMANCE; ROBOT LEARNING BY IMITATIONS; STATE-OF-THE-ART APPROACH; VISUAL ATTENTION MECHANISMS;

SOCIAL ROBOTS;

EID: 84867097732     PISSN: 15320626     EISSN: 15320634     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.2816     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Breazeal C,. Designing Sociable Robots, The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2002.
2. Bandera JP,. Vision-based gesture recognition in a robot learning by imitation framework. Ph.D. Dissertation, Dpto. Tecnología Electrõnica, Universidad de Málaga, Spain, 2010. Available from: http://www.grupoisis.uma.es.
3. Palomino AJ, Marfil R, Bandera JP, Bandera A,. A novel biologically inspired attention mechanism for a social robot. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2011; 2011. DOI: 10.1155/2011/841078.
4. Bandera JP, Rodríguez JA, Molina-Tanco L, Bandera A,. A survey of vision-based architectures for robot learning by imitation. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics 2012. (to appear).
5. Breazeal C, Brooks A, Gray J, Hoffman G, Kidd C, Lee H, Lieberman J, Lockerd A, Mulanda D,. Humanoid robots as cooperative partners for people. International Journal of Humanoid Robots 2004; 1 (2): 1-34.
6. Brugali D, Prassler E,. Software engineering for robotics [From the Guest Editors]. Robotics & Automation Magazine, IEEE 2009; 16 (1): 9-15. DOI: 10.1109/MRA.2009.932127.
7. Martínez J, Romero-Garcés A, Vázquez-Martín R, Bandera A,. Recipes for designing high-performance and robust software for robots. Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics Automation and Mechatronics (RAM 2010), Singapore, Singapore, 2010; 250-255.
8. Schmidt DC, Huston S,. C++ Network Programming Volume 1: Mastering Complexity with ACE and Patterns. Addison-Wesley: Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 2002.
9. Object Management Group. Data Distribution Service for Real-time Systems (DDS), version 1.2, 2007.
10. Gerkey BP, Vaughan RT, Howard A,. The player/stage project: tools for multi-robot and distributed sensor systems. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Advanced Robotics, Taipei (Taiwan), 2003; 317-323.
11. Montemerlo M, Roy N, Thrun S,. Perspectives on standardization in mobile robot programming: the Carnegie Mellon Navigation (CARMEN) toolkit. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Las Vegas, USA, 2003; 2436-2441.
12. ROS Open Source Community. ROS: the meta-operating system for robots, 2011. Available from: http://ros.org.
13. Bruyninckx H, Soetens P, Koninckx B,. The real-time motion control core of the Orocos project. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Taipei, Taiwan, 2003; 2766-2771.
14. Enderle S, Utz H, Sablatng S, Simon S, Kraetzschmar G, Palm G,. Miro: middleware for autonomous mobile robots. Telematics Applications in Automation and Robotics, Weingarten, Germany, 2001.
15. Brooks A, Kaupp T, Makarenko A, Williams S, Orebäck A,. Orca: a component model and repository. In Software Engineering for Experimental Robotics, Brugali D, (ed.), Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 2007.
16. Bustos P, Bachiller P, Manso L,. RoboComp Project, 2011. Available from: http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/robocomp.
17. Object Management Group. Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA/IIOP), 2008.
18. ZeroC. Internet Communications Engine, 2011. Available from: http://www.zeroc.com/.
19. Schmidt DC, Gokhale A, Harrison TH, Levine D, Cleeland C,. TAO: a high-performance endsystem architecture for real-time CORBA, 1997.
20. Object Management Group. Real time CORBA, 2005.
21. Martínez J, Romero-Garcés A, Manso L, Bustos P,. Improving a robotics framework with real-time and high-performance features. In Simulation, Modeling, and Programming for Autonomous Robots, Vol. 6472, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 2010; 263-274.
22. Schmidt DC, Huston SD,. C++ Network Programming Volume 2: Systematic Reuse with ACE and Frameworks. Addison-Wesley: Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 2003.
23. PrismTech. OpenSplice DDS, 2011. Available from: http://www.opensplice. com.
24. Object Computing Inc. The open source C++ DDS implementation (OpenDDS), 2011. Available from: http://www.opendds.org/.
25. Marfil R, Bandera A, Rodríguez J, Sandoval F,. Real-time template-based tracking of non-rigid objects using bounded irregular pyramids. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robotics and Systems, vol. 1, Sendai, Japan, 2004; 301-306.
26. Shin HJ, Lee J, Shin SY, Gleicher M,. Computer pupetry: an importance-based approach. ACM Transactions on Graphics 2001; 20 (2): 67-94.
27. Schlegel C, Hassler T, Lotz A, Steck A,. Robotic software systems: from code-driven to model-driven designs. International Conference on Advanced Robotics, 2009. ICAR 2009, Munich (Germany), 2009; 1-8.