Research in the fields of medicine in Slovenia - Research potential, funding, and publications;Raziskave na področjih medicinskih ved v Sloveniji - Kadrovska in finančna moč ter znanstvena produkcija

Zdravniski Vestnik

Volumn 81, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 602-617

  Pečlin, Stojan ^a   Južnič, Primož ^b  

^a Biomedical Research and Innovation Society   (Slovenia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Bibliometric indicators; Biomedical research; Public funds; Research policy; Slovenia

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; ARTICLE; BIBLIOMETRICS; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; CITATION ANALYSIS; CLINICAL MEDICINE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA PROCESSING; ENGINEERING; FUNDING; GEOLOGY; HUMAN; INVESTMENT; MATHEMATICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NATURAL SCIENCE; PHYSICS; PUBLICATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELATIVE SPECIALIZATION INDEX; RESEARCH POTENTIAL; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SLOVENIA; SOCIOLOGY; WRITING;

EID: 84867078121     PISSN: 13180347     EISSN: 15810224     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Martin BR. The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research. Scientometrics 1996; 36: 343-362.
2. Salter AJ, Martin BR. The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review. Researh Policy 2001; 30: 509-532.
3. Lewison G. From biomedical research to health improvement. Scientometrics 2002; 54: 179-192.
4. Južnič P, Mandelj T, Pečlin S. Information support for the evaluation of research activities. In: Information, innovation, responsibility: information professional in the network society: proceedings of the 14th BOBCATSSS Symposium; 2006 Jan 30-Feb 1; Tallinn, Estonia; Tallinn University, Department of Information Studies. Aalborg: Royal School of Library and Information Science; 2006. p. 211-222.
5. Grubič Z. Ocenjevanje znanstvenega dela na biomedicinskem področju v Sloveniji včeraj in danes. Zdrav Vestn 2011; 80: 63-70.
6. van Raan AFJ. Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer reviewed based evaluation and foresight exercises. Scientometrics 1996; 36: 397-420.
7. van Raan AFJ. The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments. Technikfolgenabschätzung 2003; 12: 20-29.
8. Leydesdorff L, Wagner C. Macro - level indicators of the relations between research funding and research output. Journal of Informetrics 2009; 3: 353-362.
9. Weiss AP. Measuring the Impact of Medical Research: Moving from Outputs to Outcomes. Am J Psychiatry 2007; 164: 206-214.
10. REIST-2. The European Report on Science and Technology Indicators 1997, EUR 17639, European Commission 1997, Brussels.
11. van Raan AFJ. Bibliometric Statistical Properties of the 100 Largest European Research Universities: Prevalent Scaling Rules in the Science System. JASIST 2010; 59: 461-475.
12. SURS http://www.stat.si/publikacije/pub_statinf.asp
13. Eurostat http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home/
14. NSI. National Science Indicators (NSI) 1981-2008, Thomson Reuters; 2008.
15. Braun T, Glänzel W. Chemistry research in Eastern Central Europe (1992-1997). Fact and figures on publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics 2000; 49: 187-213.
16. Glänzel W. National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics 2001; 51: 69-115.
17. InCites TM Essential Science Indicators, Thomson Reuters.
18. Pečlin, S., Južnič P., Blagus, R., Čižek-Sajko, M., Stare, J. Effects of international collaboration and status of journal on impact of papers. Scientometrics 2012. DOI 10.1007/s11192-012-0768-8.
19. Hendrix D. An analysis of bibliometric indicators, National Institutes of Health funding, and faculty size at Association of American Medical Colleges medical schools, 1997-2007. J Med Libr Assoc 2008; 96: 324-334.