Information integration in risky choice: Identification and stability

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 2, Issue NOV, 2011, Pages

  Stewart, Neil ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867063505     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00301     Document Type: Note

References (30)

1. Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundations of Information Integration Theory. New York: Academic Press.
2. Anderson, N. H., and Butzin, C. A. (1978). Integrationtheory applied to children's judgments of equity. Dev. Psychol. 14, 593-606.
3. Anderson, N. H., and Shanteau, J. C. (1970). Information integration in risky decision making. J. Exp. Psychol. 84, 441-451.
4. Bernouli, D. (1738/1954). Expositions of a new theory of the measurement of risk. Econometrica 22, 23-36.
5. Birnbaum, M. H. (2008). New paradoxes of risky decision making. Psychol. Rev. 115, 453-501.
6. Busemeyer, J. R., and Townsend, J. T. (1993). Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychol. Rev. 100 432-459.
7. Dougherty, M. P. R., and Shanteau, J. (1999). Averaging expectancies and perceptual experiences in the assessment of quality. Acta Psychol. (Amst) 101, 49-67.
8. Edwards, W. (1955). The predictions of decisions among bets. J. Exp. Psychol. 50, 201-214.
9. Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47, 263-291.
10. Levin, I. R., Johnson, R. D., Russo, C. P., and Delden, P. J. (1985). Framing effects in judgment tasks with Massaro, D. W., and Friedman, D. (1990). Models of integration given multiple sources of information. Psychol. Rev. 97, 225-252.
11. Mellers, B. A., and Chang, S. (1994). Representations of risk judgments. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 57, 167-184.
12. Mellers, B. A., Chang, S. J., Birnbaum, M. H., and Ordóñez, L. D. (1992a). Preferences, prices, and ratings is risky decision-making. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 18, 347-361.
13. Mellers, B. A., Ordóñez, L. D., and Birnbaum, M. H. (1992b). A change-of-process theory for contextual effects and preference reversals in risky decision making. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 52, 331-369.
14. Mullet, E. (1992). The probability (utility rule in attractiveness judgments of positive gambles. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 52 246-255.
15. Oden, G. C., and Massaro, D. W. (1978). Integration of featural information in speech perception. Psychol. Rev. 85, 172-191.
16. Ordóñez, L. D., and Benson, L. (1997). Decisions under time pressure: how time constraint affects risky decision making. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 71, 121-140.
17. Quiggin, J. (1993). Generalized Expected Utility Theory: The Rank-Dependent Model. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
18. Rosenblatt, F. (1958). The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychol. Rev. 65, 386-408.
19. Savage, L. J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley.
20. Shanteau, J. (1974). Component processes in risky decision making. J. Exp. Psychol. 103, 680-691.
21. Shanteau, J. C., and Anderson, N. H. (1969). Test of a conflict model for preference judgment. J. Math. Psychol. 6, 312-325.
22. Sjöberg, L. (1968). Studies of the rated favorableness of offers to gamble. Scand. J. Psychol. 9, 257-273.
23. Stewart, N. (2009). Decision by sampling: the role of the decision environment in risky choice. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 62, 1041-1062.
24. Stewart, N., Chater, N., and Brown, G. D. A. (2006). Decision by sampling. Cogn. Psychol. 53, 1-26.
25. Stewart, N., and Simpson, K. (2008). "A decisionby-sampling account of decision under risk," in The Probabilistic Mind: Prospects for Bayesian Cognitive Science, eds L. N. Chater and M. Oaksford (Oxford, England: Oxford University Press), 261-276.
26. Troutman, C. M., and Shanteau, J. (1976). Do consumers evaluate products by adding or averaging attribute information? J. Consum. Res. 3, 101-106.
27. Tversky, A. (1967a). Utility theory and additivity analysis of risky choices. J. Exp. Psychol. 75, 27-36.
28. Tversky, A. (1967b). Additivity, utility, and subjective probability. J. Math. Psychol. 4, 175-201.
29. Wu, G., and Gonzalez, R. (1996). Curvature of the probability weighting function. Manage. Sci. 42, 1676-1690.
30. Zeisberger, S., Vrecko, D., and Langer, T. (2011). Measuring the time stability of prospect theory preferences. Theory Dec. doi: 10.1007/s11238-010-9234-3. [Epub ahead of print].