Fluoride dose-response of human and bovine enamel caries lesions under remineralizing conditions

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 205-209

  Lippert, Frank ^a   Hara, Anderson Takeo ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTICARIES AGENT; FLUORIDE; FLUORIDE SODIUM; FLUOROPHOSPHATE; PHOSPHATE; SALIVA SUBSTITUTE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DOSE RESPONSE; ENAMEL; HARDNESS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PH; SALIVA; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; CARIOSTATIC AGENTS; CATTLE; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL ENAMEL; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; FLUORIDES; HARDNESS; HUMANS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; PHOSPHATES; SALIVA; SALIVA, ARTIFICIAL; SODIUM FLUORIDE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TOOTH REMINERALIZATION;

EID: 84866991699     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Gantt DG, Silverstone LM, Featherstone JDB, Hicks MJ. Structural comparison of sound and demineralized human and bovine enamel. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 273 (Abstr 919).
2. Arends J, Schuthof J, Jongebloed WG. Microhardness indentations on artificial white spot lesions. Caries Res 1979; 13: 290-297.
3. Mellberg JR, Loertscher KL. Comparison of in vitro fluoride uptake by human and bovine enamel from acidulated phosphate-fluoride solutions. J Dent Res 1974; 53: 64-67.
4. Boyde A. The structure of developing mammalian dental enamel. In: Stack MV, Feamhead RW. Tooth enamel. Bristol: Wright, 1965; 163-167.
5. Whittaker DK, Edmunds DH, Green RM. Structural characteristics of bovine enamel. J Dent Res 1983; 62:439 (Abstr 218).
6. Arends J, Jongebloed WL. Crystallites dimensions of enamel. J Biol Buccale 1978; 6: 161-171.
7. Gantt DG, Silverstone LM, Hicks MJ. Prism and crystal structure of human and bovine enamel. Caries Res 1985; 19: 184-185 (Abstr 92).
8. Fonseca RB, Haiter-Neto F, Fernandes-Neto AJ, Seabra Barbosa GA, Soares CI. Radiodensity of enamel and dentin of human, bovine and swine teeth. Arch Oral Biol 2004; 49: 919-922.
9. Fonseca RB, Haiter-Neto F, Carlo HL, Soares CJ, Sinhoreti MAC, Puppin-Rontani RM, Correr-Sobrinho L. Radiodensity and hardness of enamel and dentin of human and bovine teeth, varying bovine teeth age. Arch Oral Biol 2008; 53: 1023-1029.
10. Arends J, Schuthof J, Jongebloed WG. Lesion depth and microhardness indentations on artificial white spot lesions. Caries Res 1980;14:190-195.
11. Featherstone JD, Mellberg JR. Relative rates of progress of artificial carious lesions in bovine, ovine and human enamel. Caries Res 1981; 15: 109-114.
12. Edmunds DH, Whittaker DK, Green RM. Suitability of human, bovine, equine, and ovine tooth enamel for studies of artificial bacterial carious lesions. Caries Res 1988; 22: 327-336.
13. Kielbassa AM, Hellwig E, Meyer-Lueckel H. Effects of irradiation on in situ remineralization of human and bovine enamel demineralized in vitro. Caries Res 2006; 40: 130-135.
14. Lynch RIM, Ten Cate JM. The effect of lesion characteristics at baseline on subsequent de- and remineralisation behaviour. Caries Res 2006; 40: 530-535.
15. Mellberg JR. Hard-tissue substrates for evaluation of cariogenic and anti-cariogenic activity in situ. J Dent Res 1992; 71:913-919.
16. White DJ. The comparative sensitivity of intra-oral, in vitro, and animal- models in the profile evaluation of topical fluorides. J Dent Res 1992; 71: 884-894.
17. White DJ. Reactivity of fluoride dentifrices with artificial caries. 1. Effects on early lesions - F-uptake, surface hardening and remineralization. Caries Res 1987; 21: 126-40.
18. Featherstone JDB, O'Reilly MM, Shariati M, Brugler S. Enhancement of remineralization in vitro and in vivo. In: Leach SA. Factors relating to demineralisation and remineralisation of the teeth. Oxford: IRL Press Ltd, 1986; 23-34.
19. Ten Cate JM, Featherstone JD. Mechanistic aspects of the interactions between fluoride and dental enamel. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1991; 2: 283-296.
20. Stookey GK, Izu M, Schemehorn BR. Comparison of bovine and human enamel specimens in a profile hardness pH cycling model. Caries Res 2006; 40: 312.
21. Souza-Gabriel AE, Colucci V, Turssi CP, Serra MC, Corona SAM. Microhardness and SEM after C02 laser irradiation or fluoride treatment in human and bovine enamel. Microsc Res Tech 2010; 73: 1030-1035.
22. Zero DT, Kelly SA, Proskin HM, Bosma ML, Buch M, Smith SR. Comparison of marketed NaF and MFP dentifrice products using an in situ caries model. Caries Res 2007; 41:313.
23. Newby EE, Newby CS, Wood GD, Schemehorn BR. Surface hardness changes and enamel fluoride uptake in a 20 day in vitro caries cycling model. Caries Res 2007; 41:328.
24. Sakkab NY, Cilley WA, Haberman JP. Fluoride in deciduous teeth from an anti-caries clinical study. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 1201-1205.
25. Walsh T, Worthington HV, Glenny A-M, Appelbe P, Marinho VC, Shi X. Fluoride toothpastes of different concentrations for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 1: CDO07868.
26. Maia LC, De Souza IPR, Cury JA. Effect of a combination of fluoride dentifrice and varnish on enamel surface rehardening and fluoride uptake in vitro. Eur J Oral Sci 2003; 111: 68-72.
27. Exterkate RAM, Ten Cate JM. Effects of a new titanium fluoride derivative on enamel de-and remineralization. Eur J Oral Sci 2007; 115: 143-147.
28. White DJ. Reactivity of fluoride dentifrices with artificial caries. 2. Effects on subsurface lesions - F uptake, F distribution, surface hardening and remineralization. Caries Res 1988; 22: 27-36.
29. Pearce EIF, Jenkins GN. The decomposition of monofluorophosphate by enzymes in whole human saliva. Arch Oral Biol 1977; 22:405-408.
30. Toda S, Featherstone JD. Effects of fluoride dentifrices on enamel lesion formation. J Dent Res 2008; 87:224-227.