On web structure and digital knowledge bases: Online and offline connections in science

New Infrastructures for Knowledge Production: Understanding E-Science

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 206-232

  Caldas, Alexandre ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866990872     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-717-1.ch010     Document Type: Chapter

References (26)

1. Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A-L. (1999). Diameter of the World Wide Web. Nature, 401, 130-131.
2. Aquino, S., & Mitchell, T. (2001). Search engines ready to learn. Technology Review Online, April 24.
3. Bordóns, M., Zulueta, A., Cabrero, A., & Barrigón, S. (1995). Identifying research teams with bibliometric tools. In Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 83-92). Medford, NJ: Learned Information.
4. Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. In Proceedings of the Seventh International World Wide Web Conference (pp. 107-117). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
5. Caldas, A. (2004). The structure of electronic scientific communication: Electronic networks, research collaboration and the discovery of digital knowledge bases. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Sussex (SPRU).
6. th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI 97) (pp. 558-567).
7. Flake, G., Lawrence, S., & Giles, G. (2000, August 20-23). Efficient identification of web communities. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (ACM SIGKDD-2000) (pp. 150-160). Boston: ACM Press.
8. Flake, G., Lawrence, S., Giles, C., & Coetzee, F. (2002). Self-organisation and identification of web communities. Computer Magazine, March, 66-71.
9. Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science. New York: Wiley.
10. Garton, L., Haythornthwaite, C., & Wellman, B. (1999). Studying online social networks. In S. Jones (Ed.), Doing internet research (pp. 75-105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Huang, L. (2000). A survey on web information retrieval technologies. Retrieved June 6, 2002, from State University of New York at Stony Brook web site: http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/336617.html
12. Huberman, B., Pirolli, P., Pitkow, J., & Lukose, R. (1998). Strong regularities in world wide web surfing. Science, 280, 95-97.
13. Katz, S., & Martin, B. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18.
14. Kleinberg, J. (1998). Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. In Proceedings of the acm-siam symposium on discrete algorithms (pp. 668-677).
15. Kleinberg, J., & Lawrence, S. (2001). The structure of the web. Science, 294, 1849-1850.
16. Koku, E., N. Nazer, & Wellman, B. (2000). Netting scholars: Online and offline. American Behavioral Scientist [Special Issue], "Mapping Globalisation," 43(10), 1752-1774.
17. Kosala, R., & Blockeel, H. (2000). Web mining research: A survey. Proceedings of ACM-sigkdd explorations (pp.1-15).
18. Kumar, R., Raghavan, P., Rajagopalan, S., & Sivakumar, D. (2000). The web as a graph. Proceedings of the ACM-sigmod-sigact-sigart symposium on principles of database systems (pp. 1-10).
19. th very large data bases conference, Edinburgh, Scotland (pp. 639-650).
20. Larson, R. (1996). Bibliometrics of the world wide web: An exploratory analysis of the intellectual structure of cyberspace. Proceedings of Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Sciences (pp. 71-78).
21. Lawrence, S., & Giles, C. (1999). Accessibility of information on the web. Nature, 400(6740), 107-109.
22. Moreno, J. (1932). Group methods and group psychotherapy [Monograph]. Beacon: Beacon House
23. SearchEngine ShowDown (2002). Statistics for the size of the web. Retrieved March 31, 2005, from http://www.searchengineshowdown.com/stats/size.shtml
24. Van Raan, A. (1998). Assessment of social sciences: The use of advanced bibliometric methods as a necessary complement of peer review. Research Evaluation, 7(1), 2-6.
25. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Wellman, B. (1996). For a social network analysis of computer networks: A sociological perspective on collaborative work and virtual community. SIGCPR/SIGMIS '96, Denver Colorado, USA, ACM.