|
Volumn 20, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1649-1650
|
Differing approaches to experimental therapeutics: Are we a world apart?
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADENOVIRUS VECTOR;
CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE;
E1A PROTEIN;
ONCOLYTIC ADENOVIRUS;
TELOMERASE REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE;
ADENOVIRUS;
ADENOVIRUS 3;
ADENOVIRUS 5;
ANTINEOPLASTIC ACTIVITY;
CLINICAL EVALUATION;
CLINICAL RESEARCH;
CYTOLYSIS;
DOSE RESPONSE;
DRUG ADMINISTRATION ROUTE;
DRUG DISTRIBUTION;
DRUG EFFICACY;
DRUG RESEARCH;
DRUG SAFETY;
E1A GENE;
EDITORIAL;
EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY;
FINLAND;
GENE EXPRESSION;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HEALTH PROGRAM;
HTERT GENE;
INFORMED CONSENT;
JOB EXPERIENCE;
MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
MOLECULAR THERAPY;
ONCOLYTIC VIROTHERAPY;
RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
RISK REDUCTION;
TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;
TREATMENT RESPONSE;
UNITED STATES;
VIRUS GENE;
VIRUS REPLICATION;
|
EID: 84866973006
PISSN: 15250016
EISSN: 15250024
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1038/mt.2012.174 Document Type: Editorial |
Times cited : (3)
|
References (2)
|