Improving test result follow-up through electronic health records requires more than just an alert

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Volumn 27, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1235-1237

  Sittig, Dean F ^a   Singh, Hardeep ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABNORMAL LABORATORY RESULT; AMBULATORY CARE; COMPUTER; COMPUTER PROGRAM; E-MAIL; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; OUTPATIENT; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; REVIEW;

CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; DIAGNOSTIC TESTS, ROUTINE; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REMINDER SYSTEMS;

EID: 84866953688     PISSN: 08848734     EISSN: 15251497     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2161-y     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Lorincz CY, Drazen E, Sokol PE, Neerukonda KV, Metzger J, Toepp MC, Maul L, Classen DC, Wynia MK. Research in Ambulatory Patient Safety 2000-2010: A 10-Year Review. American Medical Association, Chicago IL 2011. Available at: www.ama-assn.org/go/patientsafety.
2. Callen JL, Westbrook JI, Georgiou A, Li J. Failure to Follow-Up Test Results for Ambulatory Patients: A Systematic Review. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 doi:10.1007/s11606-011-1949-5.
3. El-Kareh R, Roy C, Williams DH, Poon EG. Impact of Automated Alerts on Follow-Up of Post-Discharge Microbiology Results: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 doi:10.1007/s11606- 012-1986-8.
4. Singh H, Thomas EJ, Mani S, Sittig D, Arora H, Espadas D, Khan MM, Petersen LA. Timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic imaging test results in an outpatient setting: are electronic medical records achieving their potential? Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(17):1578-86.
5. Murphy DR, Reis B, Sittig DF, Singh H. Notifications received by primary care practitioners in electronic health records: a taxonomy and time analysis. Am J Med. 2012 Feb;125(2):209.e1-7.
6. Sittig DF, Singh H. A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(Suppl 3):i68-74.
7. Singh H, Wilson L, Reis B, Sawhney MK, Espadas D, Sittig DF. Ten strategies to improve management of abnormal test result alerts in the electronic health record. J Patient Saf. 2010;6(2):121-3.
8. Casalino LP, Dunham D, Chin MH, Bielang R, Kistner EO, Karrison TG, Ong MK, Sarkar U, McLaughlin MA, Meltzer DO. Frequency of failure to inform patients of clinically significant outpatient test results. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(12):1123-9.
9. Davis Giardina T, Singh H. Should patients get direct access to their laboratory test results? An answer with many questions. JAMA. 2011 Dec 14;306(22):2502-3.
10. Singh H, Vij MS. Eight recommendations for policies for communicating abnormal test results. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010;36(5):226-32.