Human technologies in rehabilitation: Who and How we are with our clients

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 34, Issue 22, 2012, Pages 1907-1911

  Kayes, Nicola M ^a   McPherson, Kathryn M ^a  

^a AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Connection; Partnership; Therapeutic alliance; Therapeutic relationship

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; REHABILITATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; COMMUNICATION; HUMANS; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; REHABILITATION;

EID: 84866950594     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2012.670044     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Camp CJ. From efficacy to effectiveness to diffusion: Making thetransitions in dementia intervention research. NeuropsychologicalRehabilitation, 2001. 11: p. 495-517.
2. Cheeran B, Cohen L, Dobkin B, Ford G, Greenwood R, Howard D,Husain M, et al. Cumberland Consensus Working Group. The future ofrestorative neurosciences in stroke: driving the translational researchpipeline from basic science to rehabilitation of people after stroke.Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:97-107.
3. Glasgow RE, Lichtenstein E, Marcus AC. Why don't we see more translationof health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacyto-effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health 2003;93:1261-1267.
4. Cooper K, Smith BH, Hancock E. Patient-centredness in physiotherapyfrom the perspective of the chronic low back pain patient.Physiotherapy, 2008. 94: p. 244-252.
5. Hush JM, Cameron K, Mackey M. Patient satisfaction with musculoskeletalphysical therapy care: a systematic review. Phys Ther2011;91:25-36.
6. DiMatteo MR, Sherbourne CD, Hays RD, Ordway L, Kravitz RL,McGlynn EA, Kaplan S, Rogers WH. Physicians' characteristicsinfluence patients' adherence to medical treatment: results from theMedical Outcomes Study. Health Psychol 1993;12:93-102.
7. Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Ware JE Jr. Assessing the effects of physicianpatientinteractions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care1989;27:S110-S127.
8. Bordin ES. The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of theworking alliance. Psychotherapy, 1979. 16: p. 252-260.
9. Horvath AO. The alliance. Psychotherapy 2001. 38: p. 365-372.
10. Horvath AO, Symonds BD. Relation between working alliance andoutcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. J Counsel Psychol, 1991.38: p. 139-149.
11. Martin DJ, Garske JP, Davis MK. Relation of the therapeutic alliancewith outcome and other variables: a meta-analytic review. J ConsultClin Psychol 2000;68:438-450.
12. Lambert MJ, Barley DE. Research summary on the therapeutic relationshipand other psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy, 2001.38:p. 357-361.
13. Stenmar L, Nordholm LA. Swedish physical therapists' beliefs on whatmakes therapy work. Phys Ther 1994;74:1034-1039.
14. Dahlgren MA, Almquist A, Krook J. Physiotherapists in Balint grouptraining. Physiother Res Int 2000;5:85-95.
15. Jensen GM, Gwyer J, Shepard KF. Expert practice in physical therapy.Phys Ther 2000;80:28-43; discussion 44.
16. Punwar J, Peloquin M. Occupation therapy: principles and practice.2000, Philadephia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
17. Schönberger M, Humle F, Teasdale TW. Subjective outcome of braininjury rehabilitation in relation to the therapeutic working alliance,client compliance and awareness. Brain Inj 2006;20:1271-1282.
18. Gartland GJ. Teaching the therapeutic relationship. PhysiotherapyCanada, 1984. 36, 24-28.
19. Leach MJ. Rapport: a key to treatment success. Complement Ther ClinPract 2005;11:262-265.
20. Cahill J, Barkham M, Hardy G, Gilbody S, Richards D, Bower P, AudinK, Connell J. A review and critical appraisal of measures of therapistpatientinteractions in mental health settings. Health Technol Assess2008;12:iii, ix-iii, 47.
21. Saunders SM, Howard KI, Orlinsky DE The Therapeutic BondScales: Psychometric Characteristics and Relationship to TreatmentEffectiveness. Psychological Assessment, 1989. 1: p. 323-330.
22. De Weert-Van Oene GH, De Jong CA, Jörg F, Schrijvers GJ. TheHelping Alliance Questionnaire: psychometric properties in patientswith substance dependence. Subst Use Misuse 1999;34:1549-1569.
23. Cole MB, McLean V. Therapeutic relationships re-defined. Occup TherMent Health, 2003. 19: p. 33-56.
24. Bellner AL. Senses of responsibility. A challenge for occupationaland physical therapists in the context of ongoing professionalization.Scand J Caring Sci 1999;13:55-62.
25. Crepeau EB, Garren KR. I looked to her as a guide: the therapeuticrelationship in hand therapy. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:872-881.
26. Besley J, Kayes NM, McPherson KM. Assessing the measurementproperties of two commonly used measures of therapeutic relationshipin physiotherapy New Zealand J Physiother, 2011. 39: p. 75-80.
27. Besley J, Kayes NM, McPherson KM. Assessing therapeutic relationshipsin physiotherapy: literature review. New Zealand J Physiother,2011. 39: p. 81-91.
28. Hall AM, Ferreira PH, Maher CG, Latimer J, Ferreira ML. The influenceof the therapist-patient relationship on treatment outcome in physicalrehabilitation: a systematic review. Phys Ther 2010;90:1099-1110.
29. Hills R, Kitchen S. Satisfaction with outpatient physiotherapy: focusgroups to explore the views of patients with acute and chronic musculoskeletalconditions. Physiother Theory Pract 2007;23:1-20.
30. Hargreaves S. The relevance of non-verbal skills in physiotherapy. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 1982. 28(4): p. 19-20.
31. Potter M, Gordon S, Hamer P. The physiotherapy experience in privatepractice: the patients' perspective. Aust J Physiother 2003;49:195-202.
32. Gyllensten AL, Gard G, Salford E, Ekdahl C. Interaction betweenpatient and physiotherapist: a qualitative study reflecting the physiotherapist'sperspective. Physiother Res Int 1999;4:89-109.
33. Schönberger M, Humle F, Zeeman P, Teasdale TW. Working allianceand patient compliance in brain injury rehabilitation and their relationto psychosocial outcome. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2006;16:298-314.
34. McPherson KM, Kayes N, Weatherall M; Members of the Goals-SRResearch Group. A pilot study of self-regulation informed goal settingin people with traumatic brain injury. Clin Rehabil 2009;23:296-309.
35. Kayes NM, McPherson KM, Taylor D, Schluter PJ. The FacilitatingActivity for well-Being (FAB) Programme: A pilot study of a newapproach to engaging people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in goaldirectedphysical activity. Presented at: AFRM/NIRR/NZRARehabilitation Conference. 2009. Queenstown, New Zealand.
36. Kayes N. Physical activity engagement in people with multiple sclerosis(PhD thesis), in School of Rehabilitation and Occupation Studies.2010, Auckland: AUT University.
37. Bright FAS, Boland P, Rutherford SJ, Kayes NM, McPherson KM.Implementing a Client-Centred Approach in Rehabilitation: An Autoethnography.Disabil Rehabil 2011. doi:10.3109/09638288.2011.629712.
38. Tickle-Degnen L, Therapeutic rapport, in Occupational therapy forphysical dysfunction, Radomski M. & Trombly Latham C., Editors.2008, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins p. 403-419.
39. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank MemFund Q 1966;44:(3)166-206.
40. Fadyl J, McPherson KM, Kayes NM. Perspectives on quality of carefor people who experience disability. Qual Saf Health Care, 2010. 20:p. 87-95.
41. Gerteis M, Edgman-Levitan S, Daley J, Delbanco TL eds. Through thepatients eyes: Understanding and promoting patient-centered care.1994, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
42. Horvath AO, Greenberg LS. Development and Validation ofthe Working Alliance Inventory. J Counsel Psychol, 1989. 36:p. 223-233.
43. Roberts L, Bucksey SJ. Communicating with patients: what happens inpractice? Phys Ther 2007;87:586-594.
44. Spriggs D. Difficult physician-patient encounters: when doctors makethings worse. A case series. Intern Med J 2011;41:368-369.
45. Stevens LA. Responding to the difficult patient. Bull Am Coll Surg2010;95:12-15.
46. Hinchey SA, Jackson JL. A cohort study assessing difficult patientencounters in a walk-in primary care clinic, predictors and outcomes.J Gen Intern Med 2011;26:588-594.
47. Potter M, Gordon S, Hamer P. The difficult patient in privatepractice physiotherapy: A qualitative study Australian J Physiothe2003;49:53-61.
48. Foster AM, Armstrong J, Buckley A, Sherry J, Young T, Foliaki S,James Hohaia T, Theadom, A. McPherson KM. Encouraging familyengagement in the rehabilitation process: a rehabilitation provider'sdevelopment of support strategies for family members of people withtraumatic brain injury.
49. Elvins R, Green J. The conceptualization and measurement of therapeuticalliance: an empirical review. Clin Psychol Rev 2008;28:1167-1187.
50. Lange B, Koenig S, Chang C, McConnell E, Suma E, Bolas M, RizzoA. Designing Informed Game-Based Rehabilitation Tasks LeveragingAdvances in Virtual Reality.
51. Lewis GN, Rosie JA. Virtual reality games for movement rehabilitationin neurological conditions: How do we meet the needs and expectationsof the users?