Comparison of morphological and molecular genetic distances of maize inbreds

Genetika

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 119-128

  Babic, Milosav ^a   Babic, Vojka ^a   Prodanovic, Slaven ^b   Filipovic, Milomir ^a   Andjelkovic, Violeta ^a  

^a Maize Research Institute   (Serbia)

^b Faculty of Agriculture   (Serbia)

Author keywords

Maize inbreds; Molecular and morphological markers; UPOV descriptor

Indexed keywords

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84866933740     PISSN: 05340012     EISSN: 18206069     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2298/GENSR1201119B     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. BABIC, V., M. BABIC, M. FILIPOVIC, N. DELIC, V. ANDJELKOVIC (2008): Phenotypic characterisation and relatedness of maize inbred lines. Genetika 40 (3): 227-236.
2. BABIC, V., M. BABIC, M. FILIPOVIC, N. DELIC, B. PURAR (2011): Visual assessment of phenotype by UPOV descriptor and relatedness of maize lines. Ratarstvo i povrtarstvo 48 (2): 321-326.
3. BIOVERSITY INTERNATIONAL (2007): Guidelines for the development of crop descriptor lists. Bioversity Tech. Bull. Series. Bioversiti international, Rome, Italy.XII.
4. DILLMANN, C., A. BAR-HEN, D. GUERIN, A. CHARCOSSET, A. MURIGNEUX (1997): Comparison of RFLP and morphological distances between maize Zea mays L. Inbred lines. Consequences for germplasm protection purposes. Theor. Appl. Genet 95: 92-102.
5. JACCARD, P. (1908): Nouvelles rescherches sur la distribution floral. Bull. Soc. Vand. Sci. Nat. 44: 223-270.
6. LAW, J.R., S.R. ANDERSON, E.S. JONES, B.K. NELSON, E. MULAOSMANOVIC, J.S. SMITH (2011): Characterization of maize germplasm: comparison of morphological datasets compiled using approaches to data recording. Maydica 56 (2): 1710-1722.
7. LIU, K., M. GOODMAN, S. MUSE, J.S. SMITH, E. BUCKLER, J. DOEBLEY (2003): Genetic Structure and Diversity among Maize Inbred Lines as Inferred From DNA Microsatellites. Genetics 165: 2117-2128.
8. NAGY, E., G. GYULAI, Z. SZABO, Z. HEGYI, L.C. MARTON (2003): Application of morphological descriptions and genetic markers to analyse polymorphism and genetic relationship in maize. Acta Agronomia Hungarica 51 (3): 257-265.
9. ORTIZ, R., J. CROSSA, J. FRANCO, R. SEVILLA, J. BURGUENO (2008): Classification of Peruvian highland maize races using plant traits. Genet Resour Crop Evol 55: 151-162.
10. SAGHAI-MAROOF, M., A.SOLIMAN, R.A. JORGENSEN, R.W. ALLARD (1984): Rihosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barely: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location and population dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA, 81: 8014-8018.
11. SANCHEZ, J.J., M.M. GOODMAN, C.W. STUBER (2000): Isozymatic and morphological diversity in the races of maize in Mexico. Econ Bot 54: 43-59.
12. SMITH, J.S.C., O.S. SMITH, (1989): The description and assessment of distances between inbred lines of maize: II the utility of morfological, biochemical, and genetic descriptors and a scheme for the testing of distinctiveness between inbred lines. Maydica 34: 151-161.
13. SMITH, J.S.C., O.S. SMITH, S.L. BOWEN, R.A. TENBORG, S.J. WALL (1991). The description and assessment of distances between inbred lines of maize. III. A revised csheme for the testing of distinctiveness between inbred lines utilizing DNA RFLPs. Maydica 36: 213-226
14. UPOV (1999): Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability; maize. TG/2/6. UPOV, Geneva, Switzerland.
15. UPOV (2009): Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability; maize. TG/2/7. UPOV, Geneva, Switzerland.