Communicating continuous integration servers for increasing effectiveness of automated testing

2012 27th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, ASE 2012 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 374-377

  Dösinger, Stefan ^a   Mordinyi, Richard ^a   Biffl, Stefan ^a  

^a VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Dependency management; Project dependency; Software; Software libraries; Software testing; Test coverage

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATED TESTING; CHANGE IMPACT ANALYSIS; PROJECT DEPENDENCY; SOFTWARE LIBRARIES; TEST COVERAGE; CONTINUOUS INTEGRATIONS; SOFTWARE PROJECT;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; INTEGRATION; SOFTWARE TESTING;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84866917846     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2351676.2351751     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. R. Arnold and S. Bohner. Impact analysis-towards a framework for comparison. In Software Maintenance, 1993. CSM-93, Proc., Conf. on, pages 292 -301, sep 1993.
2. G. Canfora and L. Cerulo. Impact analysis by mining software and change request repositories. In Software Metrics, 2005. 11th IEEE Int. Symposium, pages 9 pp. -29, sept. 2005.
3. G. Canfora and L. Cerulo. Jimpa: An eclipse plug-in for impact analysis. In Software Maintenance and Reengineering, 2006. CSMR 2006. Proc. of the 10th European Conf. on, pages 2 pp. -342, march 2006.
4. C. R. de Souza, S. Quirk, E. Trainer, and D. F. Redmiles. Supporting collaborative software development through the visualization of socio-technical dependencies. In Proc. of the 2007 int. ACM conf. on Supporting group work, GROUP '07, pages 147-156, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
5. P. Duvall, S. Matyas, and A. Glover. Continuous Integration: Improving Software Quality and Reducing Risk. Addison-Wesley, 2007.
6. M. Fowler. Continuous integration. http://martinfowler.com/articles/ continuousIntegration.html 2006.
7. D. German. Using software distributions to understand the relationship among free and open source software projects. In Mining Software Repositories, 2007. ICSE Workshops MSR '07. Fourth Int. Workshop on, page 24, may 2007.
8. N. LaBelle and E. Wallingford. Inter-package dependency networks in open-source software. CoRR, cs.SE/0411096, 2004.
9. F. Mancinelli, J. Boender, R. di Cosmo, J. Vouillon, B. Durak, X. Leroy, and R. Treinen. Managing the complexity of large free and open source package-based software distributions. In Automated Software Engineering, 2006. ASE '06. 21st IEEE/ACM Int. Conf. on, pages 199 -208, sept. 2006.
10. A. Orso, T. Apiwattanapong, J. Law, G. Rothermel, and M. J. Harrold. An empirical comparison of dynamic impact analysis algorithms. In Proc. of the 26th Int. Conf. on Software Engineering, ICSE '04, pages 491-500, Washington, DC, USA, 2004. IEEE Computer Society.
11. A. Podgurski and L. Clarke. A formal model of program dependences and its implications for software testing, debugging, and maintenance. Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 16(9):965 -979, sep 1990.
12. N. Sangal, E. Jordan, V. Sinha, and D. Jackson. Using dependency models to manage complex software architecture. In Proc. of the 20th annual ACM SIGPLAN conf. on Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications, OOPSLA '05, pages 167-176, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM.
13. H. Sneed. A cost model for software maintenance evolution. In Software Maintenance, 2004. Proc. 20th IEEE Int. Conf. on, pages 264 - 273, sept. 2004.