Outcome of breast lesions detected at screening ultrasonography

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 81, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 3229-3233

  Kim, Seung Ja ^a   Chang, Jung Min ^b   Cho, Nariya ^b   Chung, Se Yeong ^c   Han, Wonshik ^b   Moon, Woo Kyung ^b  

^a Seoul National University Boramae Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^c Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center   (South Korea)

Author keywords

BI RADS category; Breast; Breast cancer; Screening; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST EXAMINATION; BREAST IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM; BREAST LESION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; REPUBLIC OF KOREA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84866891810     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: 18727727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.04.019     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. H.M. Zonderland, E.G. Coerkamp, J. Hermans, M.J. van de Vijver, and E. van Voorthuisen Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography Radiology 213 1999 413 422
2. S.S. Kaplan Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue Radiology 221 2001 641 649
3. T.M. Kolb, J. Lichy, and J.H. Newhouse Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations Radiology 225 2002 165 175
4. W.A. Berg, J.D. Blume, and J.B. Cormack Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs. mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer JAMA 299 2008 2151 2163
5. American College of Radiology BI-RADS: ultrasound Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) 4th ed. 2003 American College of Radiology Reston, VA
6. O. Graf, T.H. Helbich, G. Hopf, C. Graf, and E.A. Sickles Probably benign breast masses at US: is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy Radiology 244 2007 87 93
7. S. Raza, S.A. Chikarmane, S.S. Neilsen, and L.M. Zorn Birdwell RL. BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions: value of US in management - follow-up and outcome Radiology 248 2008 773 781
8. J.H. Youk, E.K. Kim, M.J. Kim, J.Y. Kwak, and E.J. Son Performance of hand-held whole-breast ultrasound based on BI-RADS in women with mammographically negative dense breast European Radiology 21 2011 667 675
9. R.A. Smith, V. Cokkinides, D. Brooks, D. Saslow, and O.W. Brawley Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 60 2010 99 119
10. W.A. Berg Beyond standard mammographic screening: mammography at age extremes, ultrasound, and MR imaging Radiologic Clinics of North America 45 2007 895 906
11. C.K. Kuhl The coming of age of nonmammographic screening for breast cancer JAMA 299 2008 2203 2205
12. E.A. Sickles The use of breast imaging to screen women at high risk for cancer Radiologic Clinics of North America 48 2010 859 878
13. R.M. Mann, C.K. Kuhl, K. Kinkel, and C. Boetes Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging European Radiology 18 2008 1307 1318
14. W.A. Berg, A.G. Sechtin, H. Marques, and Z. Zhang Cystic breast masses and the ACRIN 6666 experience Radiologic Clinics of North America 48 2010 931 987
15. A. Itoh, E. Ueno, and E. Tohno Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis Radiology 239 2006 341 350
16. J.M. Chang, W.K. Moon, N. Cho, and S.J. Kim Breast mass evaluation: factors influencing the quality of US elastography Radiology 259 2011 59 64
17. A.S. Hong, E.L. Rosen, M.S. Soo, and J.A. Baker BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features American Journal of Roentgenology 184 2005 1260 1265
18. N. Abdullah, B. Mesurolle, M. El-Khoury, and E. Kao Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses Radiology 252 2009 665 672
19. N. Cho, W.K. Moon, J.M. Chang, A. Yi, H.R. Koo, and B.K. Han Sonographic characteristics of breast cancers detected by supplemental screening US: comparison with breast cancers seen on screening mammography Acta Radiologica 51 2010 969 976
20. S. Schrading, and C.K. Kuhl Mammographic, US, and MR imaging phenotypes of familial breast cancer Radiology 246 2008 58 70