Induction of Cross-Language Affix and Letter Sequence Correspondence

Cross-Language Knowledge Induction Workshop - International Workshop held as part of EACL 2006: 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 17-24

  Rappoport, Ari ^a   Levent Levi, Tsahi ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

CROSS LANGUAGES; EXPLICIT MODELS; LANGUAGE PAIRS; LEARN+; PRIOR-KNOWLEDGE; SIMPLE++; SPANISH LANGUAGE; WRITING SYSTEMS;

MODELING LANGUAGES;

EID: 84866885544     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Biber Douglas, 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. (Pages 320, 399, 530, 539.)
2. Bilac Slaven, Tanaka Hozumi, 2004. A Hybrid Back-Transliteration System for Japanese. COLING 2004.
3. Brill Eric, Moore Robert, 2000. An Improved Error Model for Noisy Channel Spelling Correction. ACL 2000.
4. Covington Michael A, 1996. An Algorithm to Align Words for Historical Comparison. Comput. Ling., 22(4):481—496.
5. Creutz Mathias, Lugas Krista, 2004. Induction of a Simple Morphology for Highly-Inflecting Languages. ACL 2004 Workshop on Comput. Phonology and Morphology.
6. Freelang, 2004. http: //www.freelang.net / dictionary / spanish.html.
7. Goldsmith John. 2001. Unsupervised Learning of the Morphology of a Natural Language. Comput. Ling. 153-189 (also see an unpublished 2004 document at http://humanities.uchicago.edu/faculty/goldsmith.)
8. Gusfield, Dan, 1997. Algorithms on Strings, Trees, and Sequences. Cambridge University Press.
9. Knight Kevin, Graehl Jonathan, 1998. Machine Transliteration. Comput. Ling. 24(4):599—612.
10. Kondrak Grzegorz, 2003a. Phonetic Alignment and Similarity. Comput. & the Humanities 37:273—291.
11. Kondrak Grzegorz, 2003b. Identifying Complex Sound Correspondences in Bilingual Wordlists.. Comput. Ling. & Intelligent Text Processing (CI-CLing 2003).
12. Kondrak Grzegorz, Marcu Daniel, Knight Kevin, 2003. Cognates Can Improve Statistical Translation Models. Human Language Technology (HLT) 2003.
13. Li Haizhou et al, 2004. A Joint Source-Channel Model for Machine Transliteration. ACL 2004.
14. Lin Wei-Hao, Chen Hsin-Hsi, 2002. Backward Machine Transliteration by Learning Phonetic Similarity. CoNLL 2002.
15. Mackay Wesley, Kondrak Grzegorz, 2005. Computing Word Similarity and Identifying Cognates with Pair Hidden Markov Models. CoNLL 2005.
16. th ed. John Wiley & Sons.
17. Medina Urrea Alfonso, 2000. Automatic Discovery of Affixes by Means of a Corpus: A Catalog of Spanish Affixes. J. of Quantitative Linguistics 7(3):97 – 114.
18. Melamed Dan, 1997. Automatic Discovery of Non-Compositional Compounds in Parallel Data. EMNLP 1997.
19. Mueller Karin, 2005. Revealing Phonological Similarities between Related Languages from Automatically Generated Parallel Corpora. ACL’05 Workshop on Building and Using Parallel Texts.
20. Niessen Sonja, Ney Hermann, 2000. Improving SMT Quality with Morph-syntactic analysis. COLING 2000.
21. Ristad Eric Sven, Yianilos Peter, 1998. Learning String Edit Distance. IEEE PAMI, 20(5):522—532.
22. Schulz Stefan, et al 2004. Cognate Mapping. COLING 2004.
23. Wicentowsky Richard, 2004. Multilingual Noise-Robust Supervised Morphological Analysis using the WordFrame Model. ACL 2004 Workshop on Comput. Phonology and Morphology.