Secret codes: The hidden curriculum of semantic web technologies

Discourse

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 575-590

  Edwards, Richard ^a   Carmichael, Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

e learning; hidden curriculum; knowledge representation; metadata; semantic technologies

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866871298     PISSN: 01596306     EISSN: 14693739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01596306.2012.692963     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alexander, B. 2008. "Social networking in higher education". In The tower and the cloud: Higher education in the age of Cloud Computing, Edited by: Katz, N. 197-202. Washington, DC: Educause.
2. Anderson, T. 2001. The hidden curriculum in distance education: An updated view. Change, 33(6): 29-35.
3. Anderson, T. and Whitelock, D. 2004. The educational semantic web: Visioning and practicing the future of education. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1: 1-15.
4. Apple, M. and King, N. 1983. "What do schools teach?". In The hidden curriculum and moral education, Edited by: Giroux, H. and Purpel, D. 143-167. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
5. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J. and Lassila, O. 2001. The semantic web. Scientific American, 284(5): 34-43.
6. Bizer, C., Heath, T. and Berners-Lee, T. 2009. Linked data-the story so far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 5(3): 1-22.
7. Bloomer, M. 1997. Curriculum making in Post-16 Education, London: Routledge.
8. Bowker, G. 2005. Memory practices in the sciences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Bowker, G. and Star, S.L. 1999. Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Callon, M. and Law, J. 2004. Introduction: Absence-presence, circulation and encountering in complex space. Environment and Planning D: Society and space, 22(1): 3-11.
11. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. 2000. Multiliteracies. London: Routledge.
12. Cyganiak, R., & Jentzsch, A. 2012. Linking open data cloud diagram. Retrieved fromhttp://richard.cyganiak.de/2007/10/lod/
13. Ding, L., Difranzo, D., Graves, A., Michaelis, J., Li, X., McGuinness, D., & Hendler, J. 2010, March). Data-gov Wiki: Towards linking government data. Proceedings from AAAI Spring Symposium Series 2010. Retrieved fromhttp://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/SSS/SSS10/paper/view/1154
14. Fenwick, T. and Edwards, R. 2010. Actor-network theory in education, London: Routledge.
15. Friesen, N. 2009. Open educational resources: New possibilities for change and sustainability. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10 (5). Retrieved fromhttp://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/664/1388
16. Lampland, M., & Star, S. 2009. Standards and their stories: How quantifying, classifying, and formalizing practices shape everyday Life. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
17. Latour, B. 2005. Re-assembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Law, J. 2002. Aircraft stories: Decentering the object in technoscience, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
19. Levy, P. 2009. Au-dela' de Google: Les voies de 'l'intelligence collective'. Multitudes, 36: 45-52.
20. Lytras, M. and Naeve, A. 2006. Semantic e-learning: Synthesising fantasies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(3): 479-491.
21. Margolis, E. 2001. The hidden curriculum in higher education. London: Routledge.
22. Millerand, F. and Bowker, G. 2009. "Metadata standards: Trajectories and enactment in the life of an ontology". In Standards and their stories: How quantifying, classifying, and normalizing practices shape everyday life, Edited by: Lampland, M. and Star, S. 149-176. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
23. Nelson, T. 1965, August. A file structure for the complex, the changing and the indeterminate. Proceedings of the ACM 20th National Conference 1965, Cleveland, Ohio, 84-100.
24. Nowak, B. 2010. The semantic Web technology stack. Retrieved fromhttp://www.bnode.org
25. Olsson, E. 2004. What active users and designers contribute in the design process. Interacting with Computers, 16: 377-401.
26. Orlikowski, W. and Iacano, C. 2001. Desperately seeking the 'IT' in IT research-A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research, 12(2): 121-134.
27. Pargman, D. and Palme, J. 2009. "ASCII imperialism". In Standards and their stories: How quantifying, classifying, and formalizing practices shape everyday life, Edited by: Lampland, M. and Star, S. 177-199. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
28. Raymond, E. 2001. The cathedral and the bazaar: Musings on Linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary, Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly.
29. Robinson, D., Yu, H., Zeller, W. and Felten, E. 2009. Government data and the invisible hand. Yale Journal of Law and Technology, 11: 160
30. Snyder, B. 1971. The hidden curriculum, New York, NY: Knopf.
31. Snyder, I. 2002. Silicon literacies. London: Routledge.
32. Thrift, N. 2004. Remembering the technological unconscious by foregrounding knowledges of position. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22(1): 75-190.
33. Thrift, N. 2005. "Beyond mediation: Three new material registers and their consequences". In Materiality, Edited by: Miller, D. 231-256. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
34. Tiropanis, T., Davis, H., Millard, D., Weal, M., White, S., & Wills, G. 2009. SemTech Project Report. Southampton: University of Southampton/JISC. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/projects/semtech-report.pdf
35. Urry, J. 2007. Mobilities, Cambridge: Polity Press.
36. Woolgar, S. 1991. "Configuring the user: The case of usability trials". In A sociology of monsters essays on power technology and domination, Edited by: Law, J. 57-99. London: Routledge.
37. World Wide Web Consortium. 2001. Semantic web points. Retrieved fromhttp://www.w3.org/2001/sw/EO/points