Using visual information to predict lexical preference

International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, RANLP

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 399-405

  Bergsma, Shane ^a   Goebel, Randy ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORECASTING; LINGUISTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

CO-OCCURRENCE INFORMATIONS; IMPROVE PERFORMANCE; NLP SYSTEMS; SELECTIONAL PREFERENCES; VISUAL FEATURE; VISUAL INFORMATION;

INFORMATION USE;

EID: 84866860630     PISSN: 13138502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. S. Bergsma and B. Van Durme. 2011. Learning bilingual lexicons using the visual similarity of labeled web images. In Proc. IJCAI.
2. S. Bergsma, D. Lin, and R. Goebel. 2008. Discriminative learning of selectional preference from unlabeled text. In Proc. EMNLP, pages 59-68.
3. N. Chambers and D. Jurafsky. 2010. Improving the use of pseudo-words for evaluating selectional preferences. In Proc. ACL, pages 445-453.
4. O. Chapelle, P. Haffner, and V. Vapnik. 1999. Support vector machines for histogram-based image classification. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 10(5):1055-1064.
5. S. Clark and D. Weir. 2002. Class-based probability estimation using a semantic hierarchy. Computational Linguistics, 28(2):187-206.
6. I. Dagan and A. Itai. 1990. Automatic processing of large corpora for the resolution of anaphora references. In Proc. COLING, pages 330-332.
7. I. Dagan, L. Lee, and F. C. N. Pereira. 1999. Similarity-based models of word cooccurrence probabilities. Mach. Learn., 34(1-3):43-69.
8. T. Deselaers, D. Keysers, and H. Ney. 2008. Features for image retrieval: an experimental comparison. Information Retrieval, 11:77-107.
9. K. Erk. 2007. A simple, similarity-based model for selectional preference. In Proc. ACL, pages 216-223.
10. R.-E. Fan, K.-W. Chang, C.-J. Hsieh, X.-R. Wang, and C.-J. Lin. 2008. LIBLINEAR: A library for large linear classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9:1871-1874.
11. Y. Feng and M. Lapata. 2010a. Topic models for image annotation and text illustration. In Proc. HLTNAACL, pages 831-839.
12. Y. Feng and M. Lapata. 2010b. Visual information in semantic representation. In Proc. HLT-NAACL, pages 91-99.
13. R. Fergus, L. Fei-Fei, P. Perona, and A. Zisserman. 2005. Learning object categories from Google's Image Search. In Proc. ICCV, pages 1816-1823.
14. D. Hindle and M. Rooth. 1993. Structural ambiguity and lexical relations. Computational Linguistics, 19(1):103-120.
15. F. Keller and M. Lapata. 2003. Using the web to obtain frequencies for unseen bigrams. Computational Linguistics, 29(3):459-484.
16. D. Lin, K. Church, H. Ji, S. Sekine, D. Yarowsky, S. Bergsma, K. Patil, E. Pitler, R. Lathbury, V. Rao, K. Dalwani, and S. Narsale. 2010. New tools for web-scale N-grams. In Proc. LREC, pages 2221-2227.
17. D. G. Lowe. 2004. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. IJCV, 60:91-110.
18. D. Ó Séaghdha. 2010. Latent variable models of selectional preference. In Proc. ACL, pages 435-444.
19. A. Oliva and A. Torralba. 2007. The role of context in object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(12):520-527.
20. U. Padó, F. Keller, and M. Crocker. 2006. Combining syntax and thematic fit in a probabilistic model of sentence processing. In Proc. CogSci, pages 657-662.
21. P. Resnik. 1996. Selectional constraints: An information-theoretic model and its computational realization. Cognition, 61:127-159.
22. P. Resnik. 1997. Selectional preference and sense disambiguation. In Proc. ACL SIGLEX Workshop on Tagging Text with Lexical Semantics: Why, What, and How?
23. A. Ritter, Mausam, and O. Etzioni. 2010. A latent dirichlet allocation method for selectional preferences. In Proc. ACL, pages 424-434.
24. M. Rooth, S. Riezler, D. Prescher, G. Carroll, and F. Beil. 1999. Inducing a semantically annotated lexicon via EM-based clustering. In Proc. ACL, pages 104-111.