Lexicalized semi-incremental dependency parsing

International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, RANLP

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 128-134

  Hassan, Hany ^a   Sima'an, Khalil ^b   Way, Andy ^c  

^a IBM Center for Advanced Studies in Cairo   (Egypt)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; COMPUTER AIDED LANGUAGE TRANSLATION; DECODING; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH TRANSMISSION;

DECODING PROCESS; DEPENDENCY PARSING; DEPENDENCY STRUCTURES; INCREMENTAL PARSING; LEXICAL CATEGORIES; MACHINE TRANSLATIONS; RIGHT DEPENDENCIES; SYNTACTIC FEATURES;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 84866844530     PISSN: 13138502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Abney, S. 1991. Parsing By Chunks. In R. Berwick, S. Abney and C. Tenny (eds.) Principle-Based Parsing. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp.257-278.
2. Bangalore, S. and A. Joshi. 1999. Supertagging: An Approach to Almost Parsing. Computational Linguistics 25(2):237-265.
3. Bayraktar, M., B. Say and V. Akman. 1998. An Analysis of English punctuation: The Special Case of Comma. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 3(1):33-58, .
4. Berger, A., V. Della Pietra, and S. Della Pietra. 1996. A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing. Computational Linguistics 22(1):39-71.
5. Charniak, E. 2000. A Maximum-Entropy-Inspired Parser. In 1st Annual Meeting of the North American Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings (NAACL 2000), Seattle, WA., pp.132-139.
6. Clark, S. and J. Curran. 2004. The Importance of Supertagging forWide-Coverage CCG Parsing. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'04), Geneva, Switzerland, pp.282-288.
7. Clark, S. and J. Curran. 2007. Wide-Coverage Efficient Statistical Parsing with CCG and Log-Linear Models. Computational Linguistics 33(4):493-552.
8. Collins, M. 1999. Head-Driven Statistical Models for Natural Language Parsing. PhD Thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
9. Collins, M. and B. Roark. 2004. Incremental Parsing with the Perceptron Algorithm. In 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-04), Barcelona, Spain, pp.111-118.
10. Doran, C. and S. Bangalore. 1994. Bootstrapping aWide-coverage CCG from FB-LTAG. In Proceedings of Third International Workshop on Tree-Adjoining Grammars (TAG+3), Paris, France [no page numbers].
11. Goodman, J. 2002. Sequential Conditional Generalized Iterative Scaling. In 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Philadelphia, PA., pp.9-16.
12. Hockenmaier, J. and M. Steedman. 2007. CCGbank: a corpus of CCG derivations and dependency structures extracted from the Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics 33(3):355-396.
13. Marslen-Wilson, W. 1973. Linguistic structure and speech shadowing at very short latencies. Nature 244:522-533.
14. Milward, D. 1995. Incremental Interpretation of Categorial Grammar. In Proceedings of 7th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL-95), Dublin, Ireland, pp.119-126.
15. Nivre, J. 2004. Incrementality in Deterministic Dependency Parsing. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Incremental Parsing: Bringing Engineering and Cognition Together, Barcelona, Spain, pp.50-57.
16. Sturt, P. and V. Lombardo. 2004. Processing coordinated structures: Incrementality and connectedness. Cognitive Science 29(2):291-305.
17. Sagae, K. and A. Lavie. 2006. A best-first probabilistic shift-reduce parser. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics-Posters, Sydney, Australia, pp.691-698.
18. Shen, L. and A. Joshi. 2005. Incremental LTAG Parsing. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP 2005), Vancouver, Canada, pp.811-818.
19. Steedman, M. 2000. The Syntactic Process. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
20. Yamada, H. and Y. Matsumoto. 2003. Statistical dependency Analysis with Support Vector Machines. In Proceedings of 8th International Workshop on Parsing Technologies (IWPT-2003), Nancy, France, pp.195-206.
21. Mitchell Marcus and Donald Hindle and Margaret Fleck. 1983. D-theory: talking about talking about trees. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (1983), Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp.129-136.