Analysis of the incompressibility constraint in the smoothed particle hydrodynamics method

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 92, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 343-369

  Szewc, K ^a,b   Pozorski, J ^b   Minier, J P ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF FLUID FLOW MACHINERY   (Poland)

^b NANCY UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^c Recherche et Developpement   (France)

Author keywords

Density correction; Incompressible flows; Particle methods; SPH

Indexed keywords

ACCUMULATION ERRORS; COMPUTATIONAL PARAMETERS; DENSITY CORRECTION; DIVERGENCE FREE; EQUATION OF STATE; FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS; LAGRANGIAN METHODS; OPTIMAL CHOICE; PARTICLE METHODS; PARTICLE VELOCITIES; SMOOTHED PARTICLE HYDRODYNAMICS; SMOOTHED PARTICLE HYDRODYNAMICS METHODS; SPH; VELOCITY FIELD;

INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW; LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS; VELOCITY;

HYDRODYNAMICS;

EID: 84866843191     PISSN: 00295981     EISSN: 10970207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nme.4339     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Gingold RA, Monaghan JJ. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: theory and application to non-spherical stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 1977; 181:375-389.
2. Lucy LB. A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis. The Astronomical Journal 1977; 82:1013-1024.
3. Lee ES, Violeau D, Issa R, Ploix S. Application of weakly compressible and truly incompressible SPH to 3-D water collapse in waterworks. Journal of Hydraulic Research 2010; 48:50-60.
4. Prakash M, Cleary PW. Three dimensional modelling of lava flow using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics. Applied Mathematical Modelling 2011; 35:3021-3035.
5. Cummins SJ, Rudman M. An SPH projection method. Journal of Computational Physics 1999; 152:584-607.
6. Pozorski J, Wawreńczuk A. SPH computation of incompressible viscous flows. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics (Pol.) 2002; 40:917-937.
7. Lee ES, Moulinec C, Xu R, Violeau D, Laurence D, Stansby P. Comparisons of weakly compressible and truly incompressible algorithms for the SPH mesh free particle method. Journal of Computational Physics 2008; 227:8417-8436.
8. Hughes JP, Graham DI. Comparison of incompressible and weakly-compressible SPH models for free-surface water flows. Journal of Hydraulic Research 2010; 48:105-117.
9. Xu R, Stansby P, Laurence D. Accuracy and stability in incompressible SPH (ISPH) based on the projection method and a new approach. Journal of Computational Physics 2009; 228:6703-6725.
10. Hu XY, Adams NA. An incompressible multi-phase SPH method. Journal of Computational Physics 2007; 227:264-278.
11. Minier JP, Pozorski J. Wall boundary conditions in PDF methods and application to a turbulent flow. Physics of Fluids 1999; 11:2632-2644.
12. Valizadeh A, Shafieefar M, Monaghan JJ, Salehi Neyshaboori SA. Modeling two-phase flows using SPH method. Journal of Applied Sciences 2008; 8:3817-3826.
13. Shoenberg IJ. Contributions to the problem of approximation of equidistant data by analytic functions. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics 1946; 4:45-99.
14. Morris JP, Fox PJ, Zhu Y. Modeling low Reynolds number incompressible flows using SPH. Journal of Computational Physics 1997; 136:214-226.
15. Wendland H. Piecewise polynomial, positive definite and compactly supported radial functions of minimal degree. Advances in Computational Mathematics 1995; 4:389-396.
16. Feldman J, Bonet J. Dynamic refinement and boundary contact forces in SPH with applications in fluid flow problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2007; 72:295-324.
17. Morris JP. Analysis of smoothed particle hydrodynamics with applications, Doctor's Thesis, Department of Mathematics, Monash University, 1996.
18. Hu XY, Adams NA. A multi-phase SPH method for macroscopic and mesoscopic flows. Journal of Computational Physics 2006; 213:844-861.
19. Colagrossi A, Landrini M. Numerical simulation of interfacial flows by smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Journal of Computational Physics 2003; 191:227-264.
20. Cleary PW, Monaghan JJ. Conduction modelling using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Journal of Computational Physics 1999; 148:227-264.
21. Batchelor GK. An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1967.
22. Monaghan JJ. Simulating free surface flows with SPH. Journal of Computational Physics 1994; 110:399-406.
23. Pope SB. Lagrangian PDF methods for turbulent flows. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 1994; 26:23-63.
24. Cottet GH, Koumoutsakos P. Vortex Methods, Theory and Practice, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2000.
25. Van der Vorst HA. Bi-CGSTAB: a fast and smoothly converging variant of Bi-CG for solution of nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing 1992; 2:631-644.
26. Monaghan JJ. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 1992; 30:542-574.
27. Monaghan JJ. On the problem of penetration in particle methods. Journal of Computational Physics 1989; 82:1-15.
28. Campbell PM. Some new algorithms for boundary value problems in smoothed particle hydrodynamics, Technical Report Technical Report NA-TR-88-296, Mission Research Corporation, Albuquerque, 1989.
29. Shao S, Lo EY. Incompressible SPH method for simulating Newtonian and non-Newtonian flows with a free surface. Advances in Water Resources 2003; 26:787-800.
30. Yildiz M, Rook RA, Suleman A. SPH with multiple boundary tangent method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2009; 77:1416-1438.
31. Ghia U, Ghia KN, Shin CT. High Re-solution for incompressible flow using the Navier-Stokes equations and a multigrid method. Journal of Computational Physics 1982; 48:387-411.
32. Swegle JW, Hicks DL, Attaway SW. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics stability analysis. Journal of Computational Physics 1995; 116:123-134.
33. Monaghan JJ. SPH without a tensile instability. Journal of Computational Physics 2000; 159:290-311.
34. Chaniotis AK, Poulikakos D, Koumoutsakos P. Remeshed smoothed particle hydrodynamics for the simulation of viscous and heat conducting flows. Journal of Computational Physics 2002; 182:67-90.
35. Dyka CT, Ingel RP. An approach for tensile instability in smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Computers & Structures 1995; 57:573-580.
36. Randles PW, Libersky LD. Normalized SPH with stress points. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2000; 48:1445-1462.
37. Robinson M. Turbulence and viscous mixing using smoothed particle hydrodynamics, PhD Thesis, Monash University, Australia, 2009.
38. Shu C, Wang L, Chew YT. Numerical computation of three-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in primitive variable form by DQ method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2003; 43:345-368.
39. Lo DC, Murugesan K, Young DL. Numerical solution of three-dimensional velocity-vorticity Navier-Stokes equations by finite difference method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2005; 47:1469-1487.
40. Szewc K, Pozorski J, Tanière A. Modeling of natural convection with Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: non-Boussinesq formulation. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 2011; 54:4807-4816.
41. Grenier N, Antuono M, Colagrossi A, Le Touzé D, Alessandrini B. An Hamiltonian interface SPH formulation for multi-fluid and free-surface flows. Journal of Computational Physics 2009; 228:8380-8393.
42. Hongbin J, Xin D. On criterions for smoothed particle hydrodynamics kernels in stable field. Journal of Computational Physics 2005; 202:699-709.
43. Brackbill JU, Kothe DB, Zemach C. A continuum method for modelling surface tension. Journal of Computational Physics 1992; 100:335-354.
44. Morris JP. Simulating surface tension with smoothed particle hydrodynamics. International Journal of Numerical Methods in Fluids 2000; 33:333-353.