The impact of map and data resolution on the determination of the agricultural utilisation of organic soils in Germany

Environmental Management

Volumn 49, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1150-1162

  Roeder, Norbert ^a   Osterburg, Bernhard ^a  

^a THÜNEN INSTITUTE OF CLIMATE SMART AGRICULTURE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Agriculture; Land use intensity; Modifiable areal unit problem; Peatland

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; AGRICULTURE; CULTIVATION; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GASES; PROFITABILITY; SOILS; WETLANDS;

AGRICULTURAL LAND USE; AGRICULTURAL SECTOR; HIGH RESOLUTION DATA; INTENSITY GRADIENTS; MODIFIABLE AREAL UNIT PROBLEM; PEATLAND; SOIL CHARACTERISTICS; SPATIAL AGGREGATION;

LAND USE;

SOIL ORGANIC MATTER; CARBON DIOXIDE;

ABATEMENT COST; AGRICULTURAL SOIL; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GREENHOUSE GAS; LAND USE; PEATLAND; SOIL ORGANIC MATTER;

AGRICULTURAL LAND; ARABLE LAND; ARTICLE; CARBON FOOTPRINT; FORAGE; FOREST; GERMANY; GRASSLAND; GREENHOUSE GAS; LAND USE; PEATLAND; RURAL AREA; SOIL; STOCKING DENSITY; SWAMP; WETLAND; AGRICULTURE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CHEMISTRY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; METHODOLOGY; STANDARD;

GERMANY;

AGRICULTURE; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON FOOTPRINT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GERMANY; MAPS AS TOPIC; SOIL;

EID: 84866786592     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: 14321009     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-012-9849-y     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bach M, Breuer L, Frede HG, Huisman JA, Otte A, Waldhardt R (2006) Accuracy and congruency of three different digital landuse maps. Landscape and Urban Planning 78: 289-299.
2. BGR (Bundesanstalt fü r Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe) (2003) GUEK 200 (Geologische Uebersichtskarte der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1: 200 000). Hannover, Germany.
3. BGR (Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe) (2010) BUEK 1000 (Bodenuebersichtskarte von Deutschland 1: 1 000 000 Hannover, Germany.
4. BKG (Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie) (2008) Basis-DLM (Digitales Basis-Landschaftsmodell) 1: 25 000. Frankfurt, Germany.
5. Boden Ad-hoc AG (2005) Bodenkundliche Kartieranleitung, 5th edn. Hannover, Germany.
6. Dierschke H, Briemle G (2002) Kulturgrasland: Wiesen. Weiden und verwandte Staudenfluren, Stuttgart, Germany.
7. Drösler M, Freibauer A, AdelmannW, Augustin J, Bergman L, Beyer C, Chojnicki B, Förster C, Giebels M, Görlitz S, Höper H, Kantelhardt J, Liebersbach H, Hahn-Schöfl M, Minke M, Petschow U, Pfadenhauer J, SchallerL, Schägner P, Sommer M, Thuille M, WehrhanM (2011) Klimaschutz durch Moorschutz in der Praxis. Arbeitsberichte aus dem vTI-Institut für Agrarrelevante Klimaforschung (04/2011). http://www. vti. bund. de/fileadmin/dam_uploads/Institute/AK/PDFs/Klimaschutz_Moorschutz_Praxis_BMBF_vTIBericht_20110408. pdf. Braunschweig, Berlin, Freising, Jena, Müncheberg, Wien.
8. Eggelsmann R, Barthels R (1975) Oxidativer Torfverzehr im Niedermoor in Abhängigkeit von Entwässerung, Nutzung und Düngung. Mitteilung der Deutschen Bodenkundlichen Gesellschaft 22: 215-221.
9. EUROSTAT (2009) Statistical disclosure control. http://epp. euro stat. ec. europa. eu/portal/page/portal/research_methodology/methodology/statistical_disclosure_control. Accessed date 25 April 2009.
10. FAO (2006) World reference base for soil resources. World soil resources report 103 ftp://ftp. fao. org/agl/agll/docs/wsrr103e. pdf. Rome.
11. FDZ (Research Data Centres of the Federal Statistical Office and the Statistical Offices of the Länder) (2010) AFID-panel agriculture (Farm structure Survey (FSS) 1999, 2003 and 2007.
12. Giri C, Zhiliang Zhu Z, Reed B (2005) Comparative analysis of the Global Land Cover 2000 and MODIS land cover data sets. Remote Sensing of Environment 94: 123-132.
13. Haenel HD (ed) (2010) Calculation of emissions from German agriculture-national emission inventory report (NIR) 2010 for 2008. Landbauforschung Völkenrode (334). Braunschweig, Germany.
14. Havlik P, Schneider UA, Schmid E, Bottcher H, Fritz S, Skalsky R, Aoki K, De Cara S, Kindermann G, Kraxner F, Leduc S, McCallum I, Mosnier A, Sauer T, Obersteiner M (2011) Global land-use implications of first and second generation biofuel targets. Energy Policy 39: 5690-5702.
15. Höper H (2007) Freisetzung von Treibhausgasen aus deutschen Mooren. Telma 37: 85-116.
16. IPCC (2006) Good practice guidance for land use, land use change and forestry. http://www. ipcc-nggip. iges. or. jp/public/2006gl/pdf/4_Volume4/V4-03_Ch3_Representation. pdf. Geneva. Switzerland.
17. Kantelhardt J, Hoffmann H (2001) Economic evaluation of ecological management instructions for agriculture-the example of the Donauried. Berichte über Landwirtschaft 79: 415-436.
18. Keil, M, Kiefl R, Strunz G, Mehl H, Mohaupt-Jahr B (2004) Examples and experiences of the update interpretation process for CLC2000 in Germany. In: Proceedings CORINE land cover workshop, 20-21 January 2004, Berlin. UBA-Texte 04/04: 52-61.
19. Lösel G (2005) Informationsgüte kleinmassstäbiger Bodenkarten-Probleme und Entwicklungsmöglichkeiten. PhD-Thesis. Universität Hannover. Germany.
20. Oleszczuk R, Regina K, Szajdak L, Höper H, Maryganova V (2008) Impacts of agricultural utilization of peat soils on the greenhouse gas balance. In Strack M (ed) Peatlands and climate change, Jyväskylä, Finland, pp 70-97. http://www. peatsociety. org/sites/default/files/files/PeatlandsandClimateChangeBookIPS2008. pdf. Accessed Date 02 Oct 2008.
21. Openshaw S, Taylor PJ (1979) A million or so correlation coefficients: Three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem. In Wrigley N (ed) Statistical applications in the spatial sciences. London, pp 127-144.
22. Poeplau C, Don A, Vesterdal L, Leifeld J, Van Wesemael B, Schumacher J, Gensior A (2011) Temporal dynamics of soil organic carbon after land-use change in the temperate zone-carbon response functions as a model approach. Global Change Biology 17: 2415-2427.
23. Röder N, Grützmacher F (2012) Emissionen aus landwirtschaftlich genutzten Mooren-Vermeidungskosten und Anpassungsbedarf. Natur und Landschaft 87: 56-61.
24. Sbresny J (1997) Fehlerquellen in raumbezogenen Informationssystemen. Geologisches Jahrbuch. Series F (33). Hannover, Germany.
25. Schaller L, Kantelhardt, J (2009) Prospects for climate friendly peatland management-results of a socioeconomic case study in Germany. Paper presented at the 83rd annual conference of the Agricultural Economics Society, March 30-April 1, 2009, Dublin, p 23. http://purl. umn. edu/51074. Accessed Date 16 March 2009.
26. Schmidt C, Rounsevell M, La Jeunesse I (2006) The limitations of spatial land use data in environmental analysis. Environmental Science & Policy 9: 174-188.
27. Schothorst CJ (1977) Subsidence of low moor peat soils in the Western Netherlands. Geoderma 17: 265-291.
28. Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA, Dong F, Elobeid A, Fabiosa J, Tokgoz S, Hayes D, Yu TH (2008) Use of U. S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319: 1238-1240.
29. UBA (Umweltbundesamt) (2010) National inventory report for the German Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990-2008 http://www. umweltdaten. de/publikationen/fpdf-l/3958. pdf. Accessed Date 14 June 2010.
30. Zitzmann A (2003) Die Geologische Übersichtskarte 1: 200 000-von der Karte bis zur Sachdatenbank. Z dt geol Ges 154: 121-139.