A prospective single-institution evaluation of current practices of early postoperative feeding after elective intestinal surgery

American Surgeon

Volumn 78, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1147-1150

  Rohatiner, Tamar ^a   Wend, Joseph ^a   Rhodes, Samuel ^a   Murrell, Zuri ^a   Berel, Dror ^a   Fleshner, Phillip ^a  

^a CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COLORECTAL SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; EARLY INTERVENTION; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEEDING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; SURGEON; SURGICAL APPROACH; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLORECTAL SURGERY; ENTERAL NUTRITION; FEMALE; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, ELECTIVE; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84866774541     PISSN: 00031348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Lewis SJ, Egger M, Sylvester PA, Thomas S. Early enteral feeding versus 'nil bymouth' after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. BMJ 2001;323:773-6. (Pubitemid 32946761)
2. Osland E, Yunus RM, Khan S, Memon MA. Early versus traditional postoperative feeding in patients undergoing resectional gastrointestinal surgery: a meta-analysis. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2011;35:473-87.
3. Han-Geurts IJ, Hop WC, Kok NF, et al. Randomized clinical trial of the impact of early enteral feeding on postoperative ileus and recovery. Br J Surg 2007;94:555-61. (Pubitemid 46732237)
4. Hasenberg T, Längle F, Reibenwein B, et al. Current perioperative practice in rectal surgery in Austria and Germany. Int J Colorectal Dis 2010;25:855-63.
5. Kehlet H, Williamson R, Buchler MW, Beart RW. A survey of perceptions and attitudes among European surgeons towards the clinical impact and management of postoperative ileus. Colorectal Dis 2005;7:245-50. (Pubitemid 40637424)
6. Lassen K, Hannemann P, Ljungqvist O, et al. Patterns in current perioperative practice: survey of colorectal surgeons in five northern European countries. BMJ 2005;330:1420-1. (Pubitemid 40874123)
7. Kehlet H, Buchler MW, Beart RWJr, et al. Care after colonic operations. Is it evidence-based? Results from a multinational survey in Europe and the United States. J Am Coll Surg 2006;202:45-54. (Pubitemid 41831473)
8. Roig JV, Garcia-Fadrique A, Redondo C, et al. Perioperative care in colorectal surgery: current practice patterns and opinions. Colorectal Dis 2009;11:976-83.
9. Tjandra JJ, Chan MK. Systematic review on the short-term outcome of laparoscopic resection for colon and rectosigmoid cancer. Colorectal Dis 2006;8:375-88. (Pubitemid 43676652)
10. Kuhry E, Schwenk WF, Gaupset R, et al. Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;2:CD003432.
11. Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW, et al. Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery. a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 2011;254:868-75.
12. Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 1991;78:356-60.