Challenges for quantitative psychology and measurement in the 21st century

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn , Issue MAR, 2010, Pages

  Osborne, Jason W ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866759254     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00001     Document Type: Note

References (9)

1. Fisher, R. A. (1925). Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Edinburgh, Oliver & Boyd.
2. Haller, S., and Bartsch, A. J. (2009). Pitfalls in fMRI. Eur. Radiol. 19, 2689-2706.
3. Hemmelmann, D., Leistritz, L., Witte, H., and Galicki, M. (2009). Identification of neural activity based on fMRI data: a simulation study. J. Physiol. Paris 103, 353-360.
4. Killeen, P. R. (2008). Replication Statistics. In Best Practices in Quantitative Methods, J. W. Osborne, ed. (Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage), pp. 103-124.
5. Neyman, J., and Pearson, E. S. (1936). Contributions to the theory of testing statistical hypotheses. Stat. Res. Mem., 1, 1-37.
6. Osborne, J. W. (2008). Best Practices in Quantitative Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publishing.
7. Student (1908). The probable error of a mean. Biometrika, 6, 1-25.
8. Wang, T.-T., Mo, L., and Shu, S.-Y. (2009). The brain mechanism of memory encoding and retrieval: A review on the fMRI studies. Sheng Li Xue Bao, 61, 395-403.
9. Yuanqing, L., Namburi, P., Zhuliang, Y., Cuntai, G., Jianfeng, F., and Zhenghui, G. (2009). Voxel selection in fMRI data analysis based on sparse representation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 56, 2439-2451.