Spinal manipulation epidemiology: Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies

Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 655-662

  Michaleff, Z A ^a   Lin, C W C ^a   Maher, C G ^a   van Tulder, M W ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Back pain; Economic evaluation; Neck pain; Spinal manipulation

Indexed keywords

BACKACHE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; DIATHERMY; DISEASE DURATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FUNCTIONAL DISEASE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KINESIOTHERAPY; MANIPULATIVE MEDICINE; NECK PAIN; PATIENT EDUCATION; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; REVIEW; SPINAL PAIN; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT DURATION;

BACK PAIN; COMORBIDITY; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; MANIPULATION, SPINAL; NECK PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREVALENCE; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84866749150     PISSN: 10506411     EISSN: 18735711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.02.011     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Woolf A., Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ 2003, 81(9):646-656.
2. Côté P., Cassidy J., Carroll L. The epidemiology of neck pain: what we have learned from our population-based studies. J Can Chiropr Assoc 2003, 47(4):284-290.
3. Drummond M.F., Sculpher M.J., Torrance G.W. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes 2005, Oxford University Press. 3rd ed.
4. Gross A., Miller J., D'Sylva J., Burnie S.J., Goldsmith C.H., Graham N., Haines T., Brønfort G., Hoving J.L. Manipulation or mobilisation for neck pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010, (1):CD004249. 10.1002/14651858.CD004249.pub3.
5. Assendelft W.J.J., Morton S.C., Yu E.I., Suttorp M.J., Shekelle P.G. Spinal manipulative therapy for low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004, (1):CD000447. 10.1002/14651858.CD000447.pub2.
6. Rubinstein S.M., van Middelkoop M., Assendelft W.J.J., de Boer M.R., van Tulder M.W. Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011, (2):CD008112. 10.1002/14651858.CD008112.pub2.
7. van Tulder M., Furlan A., Bombardier C., Bouter L. Editorial Board of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine 2003, 28(12):1290-1299.
8. Furlan A.D., Pennick V., Bombardier C., van Tulder M. Editorial Board Cochrane Back Review Group. 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine 2009, 34(18):1929-1941.
9. Craig D., Rice S. CRD Report 6: NHS Economic Evaluation Database Handbook 2007, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York. 3rd ed.
10. Briggs A., O'Brien B. The death of cost-minimization analysis?. Health Econ 2001, 10(2):179-184.
11. Dakin H., Wordsworth S. Cost minimisation analysis vs cost effectiveness analysis, revisited. Health Econ 2011, 10.1002/hec.1812.
12. Lin C., Haas M., Maher C., Machado L., Van Tulder M. Cost-effectiveness of general practice care for low back pain: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 2011, 1:1-12.
13. Lin C., Haas M., Maher C., Machado L., van Tulder M. Cost-effectiveness of guideline-endorsed treatments for low back pain: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 2011, 20(7):1024-1038.
14. Driessen M, Lin C-W., van Tulder M. Cost-effectiveness of conservative treatments for neck pain: a systematic review on economic evaluations. Eur Spine J, accepted for publication.
15. Bombardier C., van Tulder M., Brønfort G., Deyo R., de Bie R., Guillemin F., et al. About The Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Review Groups (CRGs) 2011, (issue 2).
16. Evers S., Goossens M., de Vet H., van Tulder M., Ament A. Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2005, 21(2):240-245.
17. Manca A., Epstein D.M., Torgerson D.J., Klaber Moffett J.A., Coulton S., Farrin A.J., et al. Randomized trial of a brief physiotherapy intervention compared with usual physiotherapy for neck pain patients: cost-effectiveness analysis. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2006, 22(1):67-75.
18. Appleby J., Devlin N., Parkin D. NICE's cost effectiveness threshold. BMJ 2007, 335(7616):358-359.
19. Towse A. Should NICE's threshold range for cost per QALY be raised? Yes. BMJ 2009, 338:b181.
20. Bosmans J.E., Pool J.J., de Vet H.C., van Tulder M.W., Ostelo R.W. Is behavioral graded activity cost-effective in comparison with manual therapy for patients with sub-acute neck pain? An economic evaluation alongside a randomized clinical trial. Spine 2011, 36(18):E1179-E1186.
21. UK BEAM Trial Team United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) randomised trial: cost effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary care. BMJ 2004, 329(7479):1381-1385.
22. Lewis M., James M., Stokes E., Hill J., Sim J., Hay E., et al. An economic evaluation of three physiotherapy treatments for non-specific neck disorders alongside a randomized trial. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007, 46(11):1701-1708.
23. Niemisto L., Rissanen P., Sarna S., Lahtinen-Suopanki T., Lindgren K.-A., Hurri H. Cost-effectiveness of combined manipulation, stabilizing exercises, and physician consultation compared to physician consultation alone for chronic low back pain: a prospective randomized trial with 2-year follow-up. Spine 2005, 30(10):1109-1115.
24. Korthals-de Bos I.B., Hoving J.L., Van Tulder M.W., Rutten-van Molken M.P., Ader H.J., de Vet H.C., et al. Cost effectiveness of physiotherapy, manual therapy, and general practitioner care for neck pain: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2003, 326(7395):911.
25. Williams N., Edwards R., Linck P., Muntz R., Hibbs R., Wilkinson C., et al. Cost-utility analysis of osteopathy in primary care: results from a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Fam Pract 2004, 21(6):643-650.
26. Drummond M., Jefferson T. Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. BMJ 1996, 313:275-283.
27. Chiou C., Hay J., Wallace J., Bloom B., Neumann P., Sullivan S., et al. Development and validation of a grading system for the quality of cost-effectiveness studies. Med Care 2003, 41:32-44.
28. van der Roer N., Goossens M.E., Evers S.M., van Tulder M.W. What is the most cost-effective treatment for patients with low back pain? A systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2005, 19(4):671-684.
29. Briggs A., Sculpher M., Buxton M. Uncertainty in the economic evaluation of health care technologies: the role of sensitivity analysis. Health Econ 1994, 3(2):95-104.