Cognitive architecture and instructional design in a multimedia context

Cognitive Effects of Multimedia Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-16

  Low, Renae ^a   Jin, Putai ^a   Sweller, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866747102     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-158-2.ch001     Document Type: Chapter

References (48)

1. Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2005). The split-attention effect in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 135-146). New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Baddeley, A.D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
3. Baddeley, A.D. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556-559.
4. Baddeley, A.D. (1999). Human memory. Boston. Allyn & Bacon.
5. Brünken, R., Steinbacher, S., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2002). Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning using dual-task methodology. Experimental Psychology, 49, 109-119.
6. Brünken, R., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2004) Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning with dual task methodology: Auditory load and modality effects. Instructional Science, 32, 115-132.
7. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293-332.
8. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1996). Cognitive load while learning to use a computer program. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 151-170.
9. Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55-81.
10. Cooper, G., & Sweller, J. (1987). The effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 347-362.
11. De Groot, A. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton. (Original work published 1946).
12. Diao, Y., & Sweller, J. (2007). Redundancy in foreign language reading comprehension instruction: Concurrent written and spoken presentations. Learning and Instruction, 17, 78-88.
13. Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Longterm working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211-245.
14. Geary, D. (2007). Educating the evolved mind: Conceptual foundations for an evolutionary educational psychology. In J. S. Carlson & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on contemporary educational issues (pp. 1-99). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
15. Hirai, A (1999). The relationship between listening and reading rates of Japanese EFL learners, Modern Language Journal, 83, 367-384.
16. Jeung, H., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). The role of visual indicators in dual sensory mode instruction, Educational Psychology, 17, 329-343.
17. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2000). Incorporating learner experience into the design of multimedia instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 126-136.
18. Leahy, W., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). When auditory presentations should and should not be a component of multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 401-418.
19. Low, R., & Sweller, J. (2005). The modality principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 147-158). New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. (1991). Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 484-490.
21. Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. (1992). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 444-452.
22. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multi-media learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 312-320.
23. Mayer, R. E., & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 389-401.
24. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
25. Miller, W. (1937). The picture clutch in reading. Elementary English Review, 14, 263-264.
26. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational psychology, 91, 358-368.
27. Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E., Spires, H.A., & Lester, J.C. (2001). The case for social agency in computerbased multimedia learning: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction, 19, 177-214.
28. Mousavi, S., Low, R., & Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 319-334.
29. Paas, F., & Van Merrienboer, J. (1993). The efficiency of instructional conditions: An approach to combine mental-effort and performance measures. Human Factors, 35, 737-743.
30. Penney, C. G. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory. Memory & Cognition, 17, 398-422.
31. Peterson, L., & Peterson, M. J. (1959). Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 193-198.
32. Reder, L., & Anderson, J. R. (1980). A comparison of texts and their summaries: Memorial consequences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 19, 121-134.
33. Reder, L., & Anderson, J. R. (1982). Effects of spacing and embellishment on memory for main points of a text. Memory and Cognition, 10, 97-102.
34. Schneider, W., & Detweiler, M. (1987). A connectionist/control architecture for working memory. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation. Vol. 21 (pp 53-119). New York: Academic Press.
35. Solman, R., Singh, N., & Kehoe, E. J. (1992). Pictures block the learning of sight words. Educational Psychology, 12, 143-153.
36. Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295-312.
37. Sweller, J. (2003). Evolution of human cognitive architecture. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 43, pp. 215-266). San Diego: Academic Press.
38. Sweller, J. (2004). Instructional design consequences of an analogy between evolution by natural selection and human cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 9-31.
39. Sweller, J. (2005). The redundancy principle. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 159-167). New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Sweller, J., & Sweller, S. (2006). Natural information processing systems. Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 434-458.
41. Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 185-233.
42. Sweller, J., Chandler, P., Tierney, P., & Cooper, M. (1990). Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 176-192.
43. Sweller, J., & Cooper, G. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 59-89.
44. Tarmizi, R., & Sweller, J. (1988). Guidance during mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 424-436.
45. Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). When two sensory modes are better than one. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 257-287.
46. Ward, M., & Sweller, J. (1990). Structuring effective worked examples. Cognition and Instruction, 7, 1-39.
47. Yeung, A. S., Jin, P., & Sweller, J. (1998). Cognitive load and learner expertise: Split-attention and redundancy effects in reading with explanatory notes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 1-21.
48. Zhu, X., & Simon, H. (1987). Learning mathematics from examples and by doing. Cognition and Instruction, 4, 137-166.