Rejoinder: Bayesian Effect Estimation Accounting for Adjustment Uncertainty

Biometrics

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 680-686

  Wang, Chi ^a,b   Parmigiani, Giovanni ^c,d   Dominici, Francesca ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 84866746931     PISSN: 0006341X     EISSN: 15410420     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01735.x     Document Type: Letter

References (16)

1. Crump, R., Hotz, V., Imbens, G., and Mitnik, O. (2009). Dealing with limited overlap in estimation of average treatment effects. Biometrika 96, 187-199.
2. Hahn, J. (2004). Functional restriction and efficiency in causal inference. The Review of Economics and Statistics 86, 73-76.
3. Hirano, K. and Imbens, G. (2005). The propensity score with continuous treatments. In Applied Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference from Incomplete-Data Perspectives: An Essential Journey with Donald Rubin's Statistical Family, A. Gelman and X. Meng (eds), chapter 7. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
4. Imai, K. and van Dyk, D. A. (2004). Causal inference with general treatment regimes: Generalizing the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association 99, 854-866.
5. Imbens, G. W. (2004). Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: A review. Review of Economics and Statistics 86, 4-29.
6. King, G. and Zeng, L. (2005). The dangers of extreme counterfactuals. Political Analysis 14, 131-159.
7. Lunceford, J. K. and Davidian, M. (2004). Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: A comparative study. Statistics in Medicine 23, 2937-2960.
8. Robins, J. M., Rotnitzky, A., and Zhao, L. P. (1994). Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed. Journal of the American Statistical Association 89, 846-866.
9. Rosenbaum, P. R. and Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70, 41-55.
10. Rosenbaum, P. R. and Rubin, D. B. (1984). Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association 79, 516-524.
11. Rubin, D. (1980). Discussion of "Randomization analysis of experimental data: The Fisher randomization test" by Basu. Journal of the American Statistical Association 75, 591-593.
12. Schafer, J. and Kang, J. (2008). Average causal effects from nonrandomized studies: A practical guide and simulated example. Psychological Methods 13, 279-313.
13. Schneeweiss, S., Rassen, J. A., Glynn, R. J., Avorn, J., Mogun, H., and Brookhart, M. A. (2009). High-dimensional propensity score adjustment in studies of treatment effects using health care claims data. Epidemiology 20, 512-522.
14. Stuart, E. (2010). Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical Science 25, 1-21.
15. Tan, Z. (2010). Bounded, efficient and doubly robust estimation with inverse weighting. Biometrika 97, 661-682.
16. Zhang, M., Joffe, M. M., and Small, D. S. (2011). Causal inference for continuous-time processes when covariates are observed only at discrete times. Annals of Statistics 39, 131-173.