Bubble vs conventional continuous positive airway pressure for prevention of extubation failure in preterm very low birth weight infants: A pilot study

Indian Journal of Pediatrics

Volumn 79, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1163-1168

  Yadav, Sucheta ^a   Thukral, Anu ^a   Sankar, M Jeeva ^a   Sreenivas, V ^a   Deorari, Ashok K ^a   Paul, Vinod K ^a   Agarwal, Ramesh ^a  

^a ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

BubbleCPAP; Extubation failure; Very low birth weight infant

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BREATHING; BUBBLE POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENTIONAL POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; EXTUBATION; EXTUBATION FAILURE; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; INFANT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NEWBORN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PILOT STUDY; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PREMATURITY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; VENTILATOR; VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT;

AIRWAY EXTUBATION; CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; INFANT, VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS, NEONATAL; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; PILOT PROJECTS; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME, NEWBORN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84866737317     PISSN: 00195456     EISSN: 09737693     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12098-011-0651-2     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Thompson PJ, Greenough A, Hird MF, Philpott-Howard J, Gamsu HR. Nosocomial bacterial infections in very low birth weight infants. Eur J Pediatr. 1992;151:451-4.
2. Parad RB. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia/chronic lung disease. In: Cloherty JP, Eichenwald EC, Stark AR, editors. Manual of Neonatal Care. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincot Williams and Wilkins; 2008. p. 373-4.
3. Davis PG, Henderson-Smart DJ. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure immediately after extubation for preventing morbidity in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2:CD000143.
4. Koti J, Murki S, Gaddam P, Reddy A, Reddy MD. Bubble CPAP for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants. Indian Pediatr. 2010;47:129-30.
5. Dimitriou G, Greenough A, Endo A, Cherrian S, Raffertty GF. Prediction of extubation failure in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002;86:F32-6.
6. Goldsmith JP, Roca TP. Ventilatory management casebooks. In: Goldsmith JP, Karotkin EH, editors. Assisted Ventilation of the Neonate. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2003. p. 519-21.
7. Rothaar RC, Epstein SK. Extubation failure: magnitude of the problem, impact on outcomes, and prevention. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2003;9:59-66.
8. Manilal-Reddy PI, Al-Jumaily AM. Understanding the use of continuous oscillating positive airway pressure (bubble CPAP) to treat neonatal respiratory disease: an engineering approach. J Med Eng Technol. 2009;33:214-22.
9. Lee KS, Dunn MS, Fenwick M, Shenan AT. A comparison of underwater bubble continuous positive airway pressure with ventilator-derived continuous positive airway pressure in premature neonates ready for extubation. Biol Neonate. 1998;73:69-75.
10. Pillow JJ, Hillman N, Moss TJ, et al. Bubble continuous positive airway pressure enhances lung volume and gas exchange in preterm lambs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;176:63-9.
11. Pillow JJ, Travedi, Javeed N. Is the noise important? An in vitro study. Pediatr Res. 2005;57:826-30.
12. Morley J, Lau R, De Paoli A, Davis PG. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure: does bubbling improve gas exchange? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90:F343-4.
13. Gupta S, Sinha SK, Tin W, Donn SM. A Randomized controlled trial of post-extubation bubble continuous positive airway pressure versus infant flow driver continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. J Pediatr. 2009;154:645-50.
14. Silverman WC, Anderson DH. Controlled clinical trial on effects of water mist on obstructive respiratory signs, death rate and necropsy findings among premature infants. Pediatrics. 1956;17:1-4.
15. Papille LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage. J Pediatr. 1978;92:529-34.
16. International Committee for the Classification of retinopathy of Prematurity. International classification of retinopathy of prematurity revisited. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:991-9.
17. Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative group. Revised indications for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity: early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity randomized trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:1684-94.
18. Tagare A, Kadam S, Vaidya U, Pandit A, Patole SA. pilot study of comparison of BCPAP vs. VCPAP in preterm infants with early onset respiratory distress. J Trop Pediatr. 2010;56:191-4.
19. Courtney SE, Pyon KH, Saslow JG, Arnold GK, Pandit PB, Habib RH. Lung recruitment and breathing pattern during variable versus continuous flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants: an evaluation of three devices. Pediatrics. 2001;107:304-8.
20. Lee KS, Dunn MS, Fenwick M, Shennan AT. A comparison of underwater bubble continuous positive airway pressure with ventilator-derived continuous positive airway pressure in premature neonates ready for extubation. Biol Neonate. 1998;73:69-75.
21. Ho TY, Ou SF, Huang SH, et al. Effects of flow rate on delivery of bubble continuous positive airway pressure in an in vitro model. Pediatr Neonatol. 2010;51:214-8.
22. Diblasi RM, Zignego JC, Smith CV, Hansen TN, Richardson CP. Effective gas exchange in paralyzed juvenile rabbits using simple, inexpensive respiratory support devices. Pediatr Res. 2010;68:526-30.
23. Kahn DJ, Habib RH, Courtney S. Effect of flow amplitude on intraprong pressures during bubble vs. ventilator generated nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants. Pediatrics. 2008;122:1009-13.
24. Kahn DJ, Courtney SE, Steele AM, Habib RH. Unpredictability of delivered bubble nasal continuous positive airway pressure: Role of bias flow magnitude and nares-prong air leaks. Pediatr Res. 2007;62:343-7.