Changes in effective connectivity according to working memory load: An fMRI study of face and location working memory tasks

Psychiatry Investigation

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 283-292

  Kim, Joon Shik ^a   Jung, Wi Hoon ^a   Kang, Do Hyung ^b   Park, Ji Young ^a   Jang, Joon Hwan ^b   Choi, Jung Seok ^b   Choi, Chi Hoon ^c   Kim, Jejoong ^a,d   Kwon, Jun Soo ^a,b  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c National Medical Center   (South Korea)

^d Duksung Women's University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Face matching; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Location matching; Structural equation modeling; Working memory

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DATA EXTRACTION; EXPERIMENTAL TEST; FACE MATCHING N BACK TASK; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; INFERIOR PARIETAL LOBULE; LEFT HEMISPHERE; LOCATION MATCHING N BACK TASK; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORKING MEMORY;

EID: 84866712794     PISSN: 17383684     EISSN: 19763026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4306/pi.2012.9.3.283     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Honey GD, Fu CH, Kim J, Brammer MJ, Croudace TJ, Suckling J, et al. Effects of verbal working memory load on corticocortical connectivity modeled by path analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data. Neuroimage 2002;17:573-582.
2. de Marco G, de Bonis M, Vrignaud P, Henry-Feugeas MC, Peretti I. Changes in effective connectivity during incidental and intentional perception of fearful faces. Neuroimage 2006;30:1030-1037.
3. Koshino H, Kana RK, Keller TA, Cherkassky VL, Minshew N, Just MA. 2008. fMRI investigation of working memory for faces in autism: visual coding and underconnectivity with frontal areas. Cereb Cortex 2008;18:289-300.
4. Bullmore E, Horwitz B, Honey G, Brammer M, Williams S, Sharma T. How good is good enough in path analysis of fMRI data? Neuroimage 2000;11:289-301.
5. Kim J, Horwitz B. How well does structural equation modeling reveal abnormal brain anatomical connections? An fMRI simulation study. Neuroimage 2009; 45:1190-1198.
6. Arbuckle JL. Amos 16.0 User's Guide. Chicago: SPSS Inc; 2007.
7. Baddeley A. Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nat Rev Neurosci 2003;4:829-839
8. Friston KJ, Harrison L, Penny W. Dynamic causal modeling. Neuroimage 2003;2003:1273-1302.
9. Penny WD, Stephan KE, Mechelli A, Friston KJ. Modelling functional integration: a comparison of structural equation and dynamics causal models. Neuroimage 2004;23(Suppl 1):S264-S274.