Recognizing proxemics in personal photos

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 3522-3529

  Yang, Yi ^a   Baker, Simon ^b   Kannan, Anitha ^b   Ramanan, Deva ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL FORMULATIONS; DIRECT APPROACH; FITTING ERROR; PHYSICALLY BASED; POSE ESTIMATION; SEQUENTIAL APPROACH;

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 84866704901     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2012.6248095     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. M. Argyle and B. Foss. The psychology of interpersonal behaviour. Penguin Books Middlesex. England, 1967. 1
2. W. Choi, K. Shahid, and S. Savarese. Learning context for collective activity recognition. In CVPR, 2011. 2
3. N. Dalal and B. Triggs. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In CVPR, 2005. 4
4. M. Eichner and V. Ferrari. We are family: Joint pose estimation of multiple persons. In ECCV, 2010. 2, 7
5. M. Everingham, L. Van Gool, C. K. I. Williams, J. Winn, and A. Zisserman. The pascal visual object classes (voc) challenge. IJCV, 2010. 6
6. P. Felzenszwalb, R. Girshick, D. McAllester, and D. Ramanan. Object detection with discriminatively trained partbased models. IEEE PAMI, 32, 2009. 2, 4, 6
7. P. Felzenszwalb and D. Huttenlocher. Pictorial structures for object recognition. IJCV, 61(1), 2005. 4
8. A. Gupta, A. Kembhavi, and L. S. Davis. Observing human-object interactions: Using spatial and functional compatibility for recognition. IEEE PAMI, 31(10), 2009. 2
9. E. Hall. A system for the notation of proxemic behavior. American anthropologist, 65(5), 1963. 1
10. E. Hall. The hidden dimension, volume 6. Doubleday New York, 1966. 1, 2
11. D. Han, L. Bo, and C. Sminchisescu. Selection and context for action recognition. In CVPR, pages 1933-1940. IEEE, 2009. 2
12. I. Haritaoglu, D. Harwood, and L. Davis. W4: Real-time surveillance of people and their activities. IEEE PAMI, 22, 2000. 2
13. N. Ikizler, R. Cinbis, S. Pehlivan, and P. Duygulu. Recognizing actions from still images. In ICPR, 2008. 2
14. T. Joachims, T. Finley, and C. Yu. Cutting plane training of structural SVMs. Machine Learning, 77, 2009. 6
15. T. Lan, Y. Wang, W. Yang, and G. Mori. Beyond actions: Discriminative models for contextual group activities. In NIPS, 2010. 2
16. A. Patron-Perez, M. Marszalek, A. Zisserman, and I. Reid. High five: Recognising human interactions in tv shows. BMVC, 2010. 1, 2
17. J. Platt. Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines. Bartlett P. Schoelkopf B. Schurmans D. Smola, AJ, editor, Advances in Large Margin Classifiers, 1999. 6
18. D. Ramanan. Part-based models for finding people and estimating their pose. In T. Moeslund, A. Hilton, and L. Sigal, editors, Visual Analysis of Humans. Springer, 2011. 2
19. A. Sadeghi and A. Farhadi. Recognition using visual phrases. In CVPR, 2011. 2, 6
20. P. Viola, J. C. Platt, and C. Zhang. Multiple instance boosting for object detection. In NIPS 18. MIT Press, 2006. 6
21. Y. Wang, H. Jiang, M. Drew, Z. Li, and G. Mori. Unsupervised discovery of action classes. In CVPR, 2006. 2
22. W. Yang, Y.Wang, and G. Mori. Recognizing human actions from still images with latent poses. In CVPR, pages 2030-2037. IEEE, 2010. 2
23. Y. Yang and D. Ramanan. Articulated pose estimation using flexible mixtures of parts. In CVPR, 2011. Code available at http://phoenix.ics.uci.edu/ software/pose/. 3, 4, 5, 6
24. B. Yao and L. Fei-Fei. Modeling mutual context of object and human pose in human-object interaction activities. In CVPR, 2010. 2