Analysis of coupling errors in a physically-based integrated surface water-groundwater model

Advances in Water Resources

Volumn 49, Issue , 2012, Pages 86-96

  Dagès, Cécile ^a   Paniconi, Claudio ^b   Sulis, Mauro ^c  

^a UMR LISAH   (France)

^b CENTRE EAU TERRE ENVIRONNEMENT   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Boundary conditions; Coupled systems; Integrated hydrological modeling; Mass balance errors; Sequential coupling scheme; Surface subsurface interactions

Indexed keywords

COUPLED SYSTEMS; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; MASS BALANCE ERRORS; SEQUENTIAL COUPLING; SURFACE-SUBSURFACE INTERACTIONS;

CATCHMENTS; ERRORS; GROUNDWATER; NONLINEAR EQUATIONS; SURFACE WATERS; TWO DIMENSIONAL;

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS;

BOUNDARY CONDITION; CATCHMENT; ERROR ANALYSIS; GROUNDWATER; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; INFILTRATION; MASS BALANCE; NUMERICAL MODEL; RUNOFF; SUBSURFACE FLOW; SURFACE WATER;

HORTONIA;

EID: 84866696741     PISSN: 03091708     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.07.019     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Crerar S., Fry R.G., Slater P.M., van Langnehove G., Wheeler D. An unexected factor affecting recharge from ephemeral river flows in SWA/Namibia. Estimation of natural groundwater recharge 1988, 11-28. Reidel. Simmers (Ed.).
2. Hughes D.A., Sami K. Transmission losses to alluvium and associated moisture dynamics in a semiarid ephemeral channel system in southern Africa. Hydrological Processes 1992, 6(1):45-53.
3. Winter TC, Harvey JW, Franke OL, Alley WM, Ground water and surface water: a single resource. Circular 1139, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO., 1998.
4. Woessner W.W. Stream and fluvial plain ground water interactions: rescaling hydrogeologic thought. Ground Water 2000, 38(3):423-429.
5. Scanlon B.R., Healy R.W., Cook P.G. Choosing appropriate techniques for quantifying groundwater recharge. Hydrogeology Journal 2002, 10(1):18-39.
6. Sophocleous M. Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science. Hydrogeology Journal 2002, 10(2):348.
7. Dages C., Voltz M., Bsaibes A., Prevot L., Huttel O., Louchart X., Garnier F., Negro S. Estimating the role of a ditch network in groundwater recharge in a Mediterranean catchment using a water balance approach. Journal of Hydrology 2009, 375(3-4):498-512.
8. Kampf S.K., Burges S.J. A framework for classifying and comparing distributed hillslope and catchment hydrologic models. Water Resources Research 2007, 43(5):W05423. 10.1029/2006WR005370.
9. Furman A. Modeling coupled surface-subsurface flow processes: a review. Vadose Zone Journal 2008, 7(2):741-756.
10. Arnold J.G., Allen P.M., Bernhardt G. A comprehensive surface-groundwater flow model. Journal of Hydrology 1993, 142(1-4):47-69.
11. Ponce V.M., Pandey R.P., Kumar S. Groundwater recharge by channel infiltration in el Barbon basin. Baja California, Mexico, Journal of Hydrology 1999, 214(1-4):1-7.
12. Osman Y.Z., Bruen M.P. Modelling stream-aquifer seepage in an alluvial aquifer: an improved loosing-stream package for MODFLOW. Journal of Hydrology 2002, 264(1-4):69-86.
13. Abbott M.B., Bathurst J.C., Cunge J.A., O'Connell P.E., Rasmussen J. An introduction to the European Hydrological System - Système hydrologique Europeen, "SHE". 1. History and philosophy of a physically-based, distributed modeling system. Journal of Hydrology 1986, 87(1-2):45-59.
14. Moussa R., Voltz M., Andrieux P. Effects of the spatial organization of agricultural management on the hydrological behaviour of a farmed catchment during flood events. Hydrological Processes 2002, 16(2):393-412.
15. Simunek J, Huang K, van Genuchten MT, The SWMS3D code for simulating water flow and solute transport in three-dimensional variably-saturated media. USGS Research Report No. 139, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Riverside, California, 1995.
16. Bixio A.C., Orlandini S., Paniconi C., Putti M. Coupled surface runoff and subsurface flow model for catchment simulations. International EurAgEng workshop on modelling of transport processes in soils at various scales in time and space 1999, 583-591. Wageningen Pers, Wageningen, The Netherlands. J. Feyen, K. Wiyo (Eds.).
17. VanderKwaak J.E., Sudicky E.A. Application of a physically-based numerical model of surface and subsurface water flow and solute transport. ModelCARE 99 proceedings of the international conference on calibration and reliability in groundwater modeling 1999, 641-648. ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. F. Stauffer, W. Kinzelbach, K. Kovar, E. Hoehn (Eds.).
18. Panday S., Huyakorn P.S. A fully coupled physically-based spatially-distributed model for evaluating surface/subsurface flow. Advances in Water Resources 2004, 27(4):361-382.
19. Kollet S.J., Maxwell R.M. Integrated surface-groundwater flow modeling: a free-surface overland flow boundary condition in a parallel groundwater flow model. Advances in Water Resources 2006, 29(7):945-958.
20. Weill S., Mouche E., Patin J. A generalized Richards equation for surface/subsurface flow modelling. Journal of Hydrology 2009, 366:9-20.
21. Jones J.P., Sudicky E.A., McLaren R.G. Application of a fully-integrated surface-subsurface flow model at the watershed-scale: a case study. Water Resources Research 2008, 44:W03407. 10.1029/2006WR005603.
22. Goderniaux P., Brouyere S., Fowler H.J., Blenkinsop S., Therrien R., Orban P., Dassargues A. Large scale surface-subsurface hydrological model to assess climate change impacts on groundwater reserves. Journal of Hydrology 2009, 373(1-2):122-138.
23. Gauthier M.-J., Camporese M., Rivard C., Paniconi C., Larocque M. A modeling study of heterogeneity and surface water-groundwater interactions in the Thomas Brook catchment, Annapolis Valley (Nova Scotia, Canada). Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 2009, 13:1583-1596.
24. Sulis M., Paniconi C., Rivard C., Harvey R., Chaumont D. Assessment of climate change impacts at the catchment scale with a detailed hydrological model of surface-subsurface interactions and comparison with a land surface model. Water Resources Research 2011, 47:W01513. 10.1029/2010WR009167.
25. VanderKwaak J.E., Loague K. Hydrologic-response simulations for the R-5 catchment with a comprehensive physics-based model. Water Resources Research 2001, 37(4):999-1013.
26. Ebel B.A., Mirus B.B., Heppner C.S., VanderKwaak J.E., Loague K. First-order exchange coefficient coupling for simulating surface water-groundwater interactions: parameter sensitivity and consistency with a physics-based approach. Hydrological Processes 2009, 23(13):1949-1959.
27. Sulis M., Meyerhoff S.B., Paniconi C., Maxwell R.M., Putti M., Kollet S.J. A comparison of two physics-based numerical models for simulating surface water-groundwater interactions. Advances in Water Resources 2010, 33(4):456-467. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.01.010.
28. Gandolfi C., Savi F. A mathematical model for the coupled simulation of surface runoff and infiltration. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 2000, 75(1):49-55.
29. Downer C.W., Ogden F.L. GSSHA: model to simulate diverse stream flow producing processes. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 2004, 9(3):161-174.
30. Abbott M.B., Bathurst J.C., Cunge J.A., O'Connell P.E., Rasmussen J. An introduction to the European Hydrological System - Système hydrologique Europeen, "SHE". 2. Structure of a physically-based, distributed modeling system. Journal of Hydrology 1986, 87(1-2):61-77.
31. Kouznetsov M., Roodsari R., Pachepsky Y., Shelton D., Sadeghi A., Shirmohammadi A., Starr J. Modeling manure-borne bromide and fecal coliform transport with runoff and infiltration at a hillslope. Journal of Environmental Management 2007, 84(3):336-346.
32. Camporese M., Paniconi C., Putti M., Orlandini S. Surface-subsurface flow modeling with path-based runoff routing, boundary condition-based coupling, and assimilation of multisource observation data. Water Resources Research 2010, 46:W02512. 10.1029/2008WR007536.
33. Cunge J.A. On the subject of a flood propagation computation method (Muskingum method). Journal of Hydraulic Research 1969, 7(2):205-230.
34. Ponce V.M., Yevjevich V. Muskingum-Cunge method with variable parameters. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, ASCE 1978, 104(HY12):1663-1667.
35. Syriopoulou D., Koussis A.D. Two-dimensional modeling of advection-dominated solute transport in groundwater by the matched artificial dispersivity method. Water Resources Research 1991, 27(5):865-872.
36. Paniconi C., Putti M. A comparison of Picard and Newton iteration in the numerical solution of multidimensional variably saturated flow problems. Water Resources Research 1994, 30(12):3357-3374.
37. Orlandini S., Rosso R. Parameterization of stream channel geometry in the distributed modeling of catchment dynamics. Water Resources Research 1998, 34(8):1971-1985.
38. Orlandini S. On the spatial variation of resistance to flow in upland channel networks. Water Resources Research 2002, 38(10). 10.1029/2001WR001187.
39. Montgomery D.R., Foufoula-Georgiou E. Channel network source representation using digital elevation models. Water Resources Research 1993, 29(12):3925-3934.
40. Orlandini S., Moretti G. Determination of surface flow paths from gridded elevation data. Water Resources Research 2009, 44:W03417. 10.1029/2008WR007099.
41. Orlandini S., Tarolli P., Moretti G., Dalla Fontana G. On the prediction of channel heads in a complex alpine terrain using gridded elevation data. Water Resources Research 2011, 47:W02538. 10.1029/2010WR009648.
42. Putti M., Paniconi C. Time step and stability control for a coupled model of surface and subsurface flow. Computational methods in water resources 2004, vol. 2:1391-1402. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
43. Hanks R.J., Klute A., Bresler E. A numeric method for estimating infiltration, redistribution, drainage, and evaporation of water from soil. Water Resources Research 1969, 5:1064-1069.
44. Neuman SP, Feddes RA, Bresler E, Finite element simulation of flow in saturated-unsaturated soils considering water uptake by plants. Third Annual Report, Project No. A10-SWC-77, Hydraulic Engineering Lab, Technion, Haifa, Israel, 1974.
45. Paniconi C., Wood E.F. A detailed model for simulation of catchment scale subsurface hydrologic processes. Water Resources Research 1993, 29(6):1601-1620.
46. Orlandini S., Rosso R. Diffusion wave modeling of distributed catchment dynamics. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE 1996, 1:103-113.
47. Todini E. A mass conservative and water storage consistent variable Muskingum-Cunge approach. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 2007, 11:1645-1659.
48. van Dam J.C., Feddes R.A. Numerical simulation of infiltration, evaporation and shallow groundwater levels with the Richards equation. Journal of Hydrology 2000, 233(1-4):72-85.
49. Downer C.W., Ogden F.L. Appropriate vertical discretization of Richards' equation for two-dimensional watershed-scale modelling. Hydrological Processes 2004, 18(1):1-22.
50. Harter T., Hopmans J.W. Role of vadose zone flow processes in regional scale hydrology: review, opportunities and challenges. Unsaturated zone modeling: progress, challenges and applications 2004, 179-210. Kluwer Academic Publications, Dordrect. R.A. Feddes, G.H. De Rooij, J.C. van Dam (Eds.).
51. van Genuchten M.T., Nielsen D.R. On describing and predicting the hydraulic properties of unsaturated soils. Annales Geophysicae 1985, 3(5):615-628.
52. R.M. Maxwell, M. Putti, S. Meyerhoff, J.-O. Delfs, I.M. Ferguson, V. Ivanov, J. Kim, O. Kolditz, S.J. Kollet, M. Kumar, C. Paniconi, Y.-J. Park, M.S. Phanikumar, E. Sudicky, M. Sulis, Surface-subsurface model intercomparison: a first set of benchmark results to diagnose integrated hydrology and feedbacks. Geophysical research abstracts (European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2012), Abstract 6641-1, 2012.