A comprehensive preference-based optimization framework with application to high-lift aerodynamic design

Engineering Optimization

Volumn 44, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1209-1227

  Carrese, Robert ^a   Winarto, Hadi ^a   Li, Xiaodong ^a   Sóbester, András ^b   Ebenezer, Samuel ^c  

^a RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^c Program Development Company LLC   (India)

Author keywords

data mining; high lift aerodynamics; Kriging; multiobjective optimization; preferences

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMIC DESIGNS; AERODYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION; COMPUTATIONAL BUDGET; DESIGN CONFIGURATIONS; DESIGN SPACES; DESIGN TOOL; INTEGRAL COMPONENTS; KRIGING; KRIGING MODEL; OPTIMIZATION FRAMEWORK; PARETO FRONTIERS; PREFERENCES; REFERENCE POINTS; REYNOLDS-AVERAGED NAVIER STOKES SOLVERS; VISUAL DATA MINING;

AERODYNAMIC CONFIGURATIONS; DATA MINING; DESIGN; INTERPOLATION; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT;

LIFT;

EID: 84866683208     PISSN: 0305215X     EISSN: 10290273     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0305215X.2011.637558     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Carrese, R., et al., 2011a. Benefits of incorporating designer preferences within a multi-objective airfoil design framework. Journal of Aircraft, 48 (3), 832-844.
2. Carrese, R., et al., 2011b. Swarm heuristic for identifying preferred solutions in surrogate-based multi-objective engineering design. American Institute of Astronautics and Aeronautics Journal, 52 (7), 1437-1449.
3. Clerc, M., and Kennedy, J., 2002. The particle swarm-explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6 (1), 58-73.
4. Deb, K., 2001. Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Chichester, UK:Wiley.
5. Deb, K., et al., 2005. Scalable test problems for evolutionary multi-objective optimization. In: Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization (EMO): Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 105-145.
6. Deb, K. and Sundar, J., 2006. Reference point based multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. In: Genetic and evolutionary computation conference (GECCO), 8-12 July, Seattle, WA. New York: ACM Press, 635-642.
7. Fonseca, C.M., and Fleming, P.J., 1995. An overview of evolutionary algorithms in multiobjective optimization. Evolutionary Computation, 3 (1), 1-16.
8. Fonseca, C.M., and Fleming, P.J., 1998. Multiobjective optimization and multiple constraint handling with evolutionary algorithms-Part I: A unified formulation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 28 (1), 26-37.
9. Forrester, A., Sóbester, A., andKeane, A., 2008. Engineering design via surrogate modelling: a practical guide. Chichester, UK:Wiley.
10. Gano, S., et al., 2006. Update strategies for Kriging models used in variable fidelity optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 32 (4), 345-383.
11. Garner, L., Meredith, P.T., and Stoner, R.C., 1991. Areas for CFD development as illustrated by transport aircraft applications. AIAA Paper 91-1527.
12. Greenman, R.M. and Roth, K.R., 1999. High-lift optimization design using neural networks on a multi-element airfoil. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 121 (2), 434-440.
13. Jeong, S., Chiba, K., and Obayashi, S., 2005. Data mining for aerodynamic design space. Journal of Aerospace Computing, Information, and Communication, 2 (11), 452-469.
14. Jin,Y., 2005.A comprehensive survey of fitness approximation in evolutionary computation Soft Computing, 9 (1), 3-12.
15. Jones, D.R., 2001.Ataxomony of global optimization methods based on response surfaces Journal of Global Optimization, 21 (4), 345-383.
16. Kanazaki, M., Jeong, S., and Yamamoto, K., 2006. High-lift system optimization based on the Kriging model using a high-fidelity flow solver. Transactions of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 49 (165), 169-174.
17. Keane, A.J. and Nair, P.B., 2005. Computational approaches for aerospace design: the pursuit of excellence. Chichester, UK:Wiley.
18. Kennedy, J. and Eberhart, R.C., 2001. Swarm intelligence. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
19. Khurana, M.S. andWinarto, H., 2010. Development and validation of an efficient direct numerical optimisation approach for airfoil shape design. The Aeronautical Journal, 114 (1160), 611-628.
20. Kim, S., Alonso, J.J., and Jameson, A., 2004. Multi-element high-lift configuration design optimization using viscous continuous adjoint method. Journal of Aircraft, 41 (5), 1082-1097.
21. Kohonen, T., 1995. Self-organizing maps. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
22. Mackay, M.D., Beckman, R.J., and Conover, W.J., 1979. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics, 21 (2), 239-245.
23. Marler, R.T. and Arora, J.S., 2004. Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 26 (6), 369-395.
24. Morris, M.D., 1991. Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics, 33 (2), 161-174.
25. Obayashi, S. and Sasaki, D., 2003. Visualization and data mining of Pareto solutions using self-organizing map. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on evolutionary multi-criterion optimization, 8-11 April, Faro, Portugal. Berlin: Springer, 796-809.
26. Quagliarella, D. and Vicini, A., 2001. Viscous single and multicomponent airfoil design with genetic algorithms. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 37 (5), 365-380.
27. Rachmawati, L. and Srinivasan, D., 2006. Preference incorporation in multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: a survey. In: IEEE congress on evolutionary computation, 16-21 July, Vancouver, Canada. NewYork: IEEE Press, 635-642.
28. Rogers, S.E., et al., 1994. A comparison of turbulence models in computing multi-element airfoil flows. AIAA Paper 94-0291.
29. Rumsey, C.L., et al., 1998. Prediction of high-lift flows using turbulence closure models. American Institute of Astronautics and Aeronautics Journal, 36 (5), 765-774.
30. Rumsey, C.L. and Ying, S.X., 2002. Prediction of high lift: review of present CFD capability. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 38 (2), 145-180.
31. Saltelli, A., et al., 2004. Sensitivity analysis in practice. A guide to assessing scientific models. Chichester, UK:Wiley.
32. Sierra, M.R. and Coello, C.A.C., 2006. Multi-objective particle swarm optimizers: a survey of the state-of-the-art. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Research, 2 (3), 287-308.
33. Smith, A.M., 1975. High-lift aerodynamics. Journal of Aircraft, 12 (6), 501-530.
34. Spalart, P.R. and Allmaras, S.R., 1992. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. AIAA Paper 92-0439.
35. Trelea, I.C., 2003. The particle swarm optimization algorithm: convergence analysis and parameter selection. Information Processing Letters, 85 (6), 317-325.
36. van Dam, C.P., 2002. The aerodynamic design of multi-element high-lift systems for transport airplanes. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 38 (2), 101-144.
37. Vatsa,V.N., et al., 1994. Multi-block structured grid approach for solving flows over complex aerodynamic configurations. AIAA Paper 94-0655.
38. Wickramasinghe, U.K. and Li, X., 2008. Integrating user preferences with particle swarms for multi-objective optimization. In: Genetic and evolutionary computation conference (GECCO), 12-16 July, Portland, OR. NewYork: ACM Press, 745-752.
39. Ying, S.X., et al., 1999. Investigation of confluent boundary layers in high-lift flows. Journal of Aircraft, 36 (3), 550-562.
40. Zitzler, E., Deb, K., and Thiele, L., 2000. Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: empirical results. Evolutionary Computation, 8 (2), 173-195.