Can we be harmed after we are dead?

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1091-1094

  Papineau, David ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

death; harm; hedonism; medicine; philosophy; value

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEATH; PHILOSOPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

DEATH; HUMANS; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; PHILOSOPHY;

EID: 84866667121     PISSN: 13561294     EISSN: 13652753     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01924.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Scarre, G., (2012) Can there be a good death? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18 (5), 1082-1086.
2. Wagner, S., Kingma, E., &, McCabe, M. M., (2012) Interdisciplinary workshops in the philosophy of medicine: death. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18, 1072-1078.
3. Mill, J. S., (1863) Utilitarianism. London: Parker, Son, and Bourn.
4. Nozick, R., (1974) Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
5. Parfit, D., (1984) Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
6. Rawls, J., (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
7. Raz, J., (2002) Incommensurability and agency. In Engaging Reason (ed., J. Raz,), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Heath, I., (2012) Living, dying and the nature of death. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18, 1079-1081.
9. Galloway, D., (2012) Bernard Williams on living long and living well. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18, 1087-1090.