Bio-inspired interfacial strengthening strategy through geometrically interlocking designs

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

Volumn 15, Issue , 2012, Pages 70-77

  Zhang, Yuming ^a,b   Yao, Haimin ^c   Ortiz, Christine ^b   Xu, Jinquan ^a   Dao, Ming ^b  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

^c HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Biocomposites; Biomaterials; Biomechanics; Biomimetics

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BIOMATERIALS; BIOMECHANICS; BIOMIMETIC MATERIALS; BIOMIMETICS; COMPOSITE MATERIALS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOUGHNESS;

BIO-COMPOSITES; BIOMIMETIC COMPOSITES; GEOMETRICAL FEATURES; INTERFACIAL STRENGTHENING; ORGANIC/INORGANIC COMPOSITES; STRENGTH AND TOUGHNESS; STRUCTURAL HIERARCHIES; SYNTHETIC COMPOSITES;

HYBRID MATERIALS;

BIOMATERIAL; BIOMIMETIC MATERIAL;

ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOINSPIRED INTERFACIAL STRENGTHENING STRATEGY; BIOMECHANICS; BIOMIMETICS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GEOMETRICAL INTERLOCKER; GEOMETRY; INTERLOCKING DESIGN; PHASE TRANSITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 84866663982     PISSN: 17516161     EISSN: 18780180     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bonderer L.J., Studart A.R., Gauckler L.J. Bioinspired design and assembly of platelet reinforced polymer films. Science 2008, 319:1069-1073.
2. Bruck H.A., Fowler G., Gupta S.K., Valentine T. Using geometric complexity to enhance the interfacial strength of heterogeneous structures fabricated in a multi-stage, multi-piece molding process. Experimental Mechanics 2004, 44:261-271.
3. Clegg W.J., Kendall K., Alford N.M., Button T.W., Birchall J.D. A simple way to make tough ceramics. Nature 1990, 347:455-457.
4. Dunlop J.W.C., Fratzl P. Biological composites. Annual Review of Materials Research 2010, 40:1-24.
5. Fang D.P., Iwasaki S., Yu M.H., Shen Q.P., Miyamoto Y., Hikosaka H. Ancient chinese timber architecture. I: experimental study. Journal of Structural Engineering 2001, 127:1348.
6. Fratzl P., Jager I. Mineralized collagen fibrils: a mechanical model with a staggered arrangement of mineral particles. Biophysical Journal 2000, 79:1737-1746.
7. Gao H.J. Application of fracture mechanics concepts to hierarchical biomechanics of bone and bone-like materials. International Journal of Fracture 2006, 138:101-137.
8. Gao H.J., Ji B.H., Jager I.L., Arzt E., Fratzl P. Materials become insensitive to flaws at nanoscale: lessons from nature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2003, 100:5597-5600.
9. Geckeler K.E., Rupp F., Geis-Gerstorfer J. Interfaces and interphases of (bio)materials: definitions, structures, and dynamics. Advanced Materials 1997, 9:513-518.
10. Hammer D.A., Tirrell M. Biological adhesion at interfaces. Annual Review of Materials Science 1996, 26:651-691.
11. Han L., Wang L., Song J., Boyce M.C., Ortiz C. Direct quantification of the mechanical anisotropy and fracture of an individual exoskeleton layer via uniaxial compression of micropillars. Nano Letters 2011, 11:3868-3874.
12. Herring S.W. Mechanical influences on suture development and patency. Frontiers of oral biology 2008, 12:41.
13. Jackson A.P., Vincent J.F.V., Turner R.M. Comparison of nacre with other ceramic composites. Journal of Materials Science 1990, 25:3173-3178.
14. Jasinoski S., Reddy B., Louw K., Chinsamy A. Mechanics of cranial sutures using the finite element method. Journal of Biomechanics 2010, 43:3104-3111.
15. Ji B.H., Gao H.J. Mechanical properties of nanostructure of biological materials. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 2004, 52:1963-1990.
16. Katti D.R., Pradhan S.M., Katti K.S. Modeling the organic-inorganic interfacial nanoasperities in a model bio-nanocomposite, nacre. Reviews on Advanced Materials Science 2004, 6:162-168.
17. Krauss S., Monsonego-Ornan E., Zelzer E., Fratzl P., Shahar R. Mechanical function of a complex three-dimensional suture joining the bony elements in the shell of the red-eared slider turtle. Advanced Materials 2009, 21:407-412.
18. Launey M.E., Chen P.Y., McKittrick J., Ritchie R.O. Mechanistic aspects of the fracture toughness of elk antler bone. Acta Biomaterialia 2010, 6:1505-1514.
19. Launey M.E., Munch E., Alsem D.H., Barth H.B., Saiz E., Tomsia A.P., Ritchie R.O. Designing highly toughened hybrid composites through nature-inspired hierarchical complexity. Acta Materialia 2009, 57:2919-2932.
20. Li Y., Ortiz C., Boyce M. Stiffness and strength of suture joints in nature. Physical Review E 2011, 84:062904.
21. Li Y., Ortiz C., Boyce M.C. Bioinspired, mechanical, deterministic fractal model for hierarchical suture joints. Physical Review E 2012, 85:031901.
22. Liu B., Zhang L., Gao H. Poisson ratio can play a crucial role in mechanical properties of biocomposites. Mechanics of Materials 2006, 38:1128-1142.
23. Mann K.A., Allen M.J., Ayers D.C. Pre-yield and post-yield shear behavior of the cement-bone interface. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 1998, 16:370-378.
24. Munch E., Launey M.E., Alsem D.H., Saiz E., Tomsia A.P., Ritchie R.O. Tough, bio-inspired hybrid materials. Science 2008, 322:1516-1520.
25. Nalla R.K., Kruzic J.J., Ritchie R.O. On the origin of the toughness of mineralized tissue: microcracking or crack bridging?. Bone 2004, 34:790-798.
26. Ortiz C., Boyce M.C. Materials science-bioinspired structural materials. Science 2008, 319:1053-1054.
27. Podsiadlo P., Kaushik A.K., Arruda E.M., Waas A.M., Shim B.S., Xu J.D., Nandivada H., Pumplin B.G., Lahann J., Ramamoorthy A., Kotov N.A. Ultrastrong and stiff layered polymer nanocomposites. Science 2007, 318:80-83.
28. Rexer J., Anderson E. Composites with planar reinforcements (flakes, ribbons)-review. Polymer Engineering and Science 1979, 19:1-11.
29. Ritchie R.O. The conflicts between strength and toughness. Nature Materials 2011, 10:817-822.
30. Saunders W.B. The ammonoid suture problem: relationships between shell and septum thickness and suture complexity in Paleozoic ammonoids. Paleobiology 1995, 21:343-355.
31. Schmidt D., Shah D., Giannelis E.P. New advances in polymer/layered silicate nanocomposites. Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science 2002, 6:205-212.
32. Shang X., Tang T., Dai K. Experimental study on the shear stress of the interface between the bone and the TCP-PMMA. Journal of Medical Biomechanics 2006, 21:111-114.
33. Tai K., Dao M., Suresh S., Palazoglu A., Ortiz C. Nanoscale heterogeneity promotes energy dissipation in bone. Nature Materials 2007, 6:454-462.
34. Tang Z.Y., Kotov N.A., Magonov S., Ozturk B. Nanostructured artificial nacre. Nature Materials 2003, 2:413-U418.
35. Wang L., Song J., Ortiz C., Boyce M.C. Anisotropic design of a multilayered biological exoskeleton. Journal of Materials Research 2009, 24:3477-3494.
36. Wang R.Z., Suo Z., Evans A.G., Yao N., Aksay I.A. Deformation mechanisms in nacre. Journal of Materials Research 2001, 16:2485-2493.
37. Weiner S., Nudelman F., Sone E., Zaslansky P., Addadi L. Mineralized biological materials: a perspective on interfaces and interphases designed over millions of years. Biointerphases 2006, 1:12-14.
38. Yao H.M., Dao M., Carnelli D., Tai K.S., Ortiz C. Size-dependent heterogeneity benefits the mechanical performance of bone. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 2011, 59:64-74.
39. Yao H.M., Dao M., Imholt T., Huang J.M., Wheeler K., Bonilla A., Suresh S., Ortiz C. Protection mechanisms of the iron-plated armor of a deep-sea hydrothermal vent gastropod. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2010, 107:987-992.