Decision support by telephone: Randomized controlled trial in a rural community setting

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 89, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 134-142

  Belkora, Jeffrey ^a   Stupar, Lauren ^a   O'Donnell, Sara ^b   Loucks, Aimee ^a   Moore, Dan ^a   Jupiter, Carla ^b   Johnson, Nancy ^b   Wilson, Leslie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Cancer Resource Centers of Mendocino County   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Community based participatory research; Cost analysis; Decision support; Dissemination and implementation research; Patient participation; Shared decision making; Telephone

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION SELF EFFICACY RATING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ECONOMIC ASPECT; FEMALE; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HUMAN; IN PERSON CONSULTATION PLANNING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MASS COMMUNICATION; NULL HYPOTHESIS; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; RECIPIENT; RURAL AREA; TELECOMMUNICATION; TELEPHONE CONSULTATION PLANNING; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; RURAL HEALTH SERVICES; RURAL POPULATION; SELF EFFICACY; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TELEPHONE;

EID: 84866614757     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: 18735134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.009     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. United States President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research Making health care decisions: a report on the ethical and legal implications of informed consent in the patient-practitioner relationship 1982, President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research: For sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O, Washington, DC.
2. Roter D.L. Patient participation in the patient-provider interaction: the effects of patient question asking on the quality of interaction, satisfaction and compliance. Health Educ Monogr 1977, 5:281-315.
3. Kinnersley P., Edwards A., Hood K., Cadbury N., Ryan R., Prout H., et al. Interventions before consultations for helping patients address their information needs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007, CD004565.
4. Leydon G.M., Boulton M., Moynihan C., Jones A., Mossman J., Boudioni M., et al. Cancer patients' information needs and information seeking behaviour: in depth interview study. Brit Med J 2000, 320:909-913.
5. McKenzie J. Information needs of patients with cancer. Similar study had similar findings. Brit Med J 2000, 321:632. author reply 3.
6. Thompson S.C., Nanni C., Schwankovsky L. Patient-oriented interventions to improve communication in a medical office visit. Health Psychol 1990, 9:390-404.
7. Butow P.N., Dunn S.M., Tattersall M.H., Jones Q.J. Patient participation in the cancer consultation: evaluation of a question prompt sheet. Ann Oncol 1994, 5:199-204.
8. Brown R., Butow P.N., Boyer M.J., Tattersall M.H. Promoting patient participation in the cancer consultation: evaluation of a prompt sheet and coaching in question-asking. Br J Cancer 1999, 80:242-248.
9. Brown R.F., Butow P.N., Dunn S.M., Tattersall M.H. Promoting patient participation and shortening cancer consultations: a randomised trial. Br J Cancer 2001, 85:1273-1279.
10. Greenfield S., Kaplan S., Ware J.E. Expanding patient involvement in care. Effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med 1985, 102:520-528.
11. Greenfield S., Kaplan S.H., Ware J.E., Yano E.M., Frank H.J. Patients' participation in medical care: effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes. J Gen Intern Med 1988, 3:448-457.
12. Kaplan S.H., Greenfield S., Ware J.E. Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care 1989, 27:S110-S127.
13. Dougherty D., Conway P.H. The " 3T's" road map to transform US health care: the " how" of high-quality care. J Amer Med Assoc 2008, 299:2319-2321.
14. Westfall J.M., Mold J., Fagnan L. Practice-based research - " Blue Highways" on the NIH roadmap. J Amer Med Assoc 2007, 297:403-406.
15. Belkora J.K., Loth M.K., Chen D.F., Chen J.Y., Volz S., Esserman L.J. Monitoring the implementation of consultation planning, recording, and summarizing in a breast care center. Patient Educ Couns 2008, 73:536-543.
16. Belkora J.K., Loth M.K., Volz S., Rugo H.S. Implementing decision and communication aids to facilitate patient-centered care in breast cancer: a case study. Patient Educ Couns 2009, 77:360-368.
17. Belkora J., Edlow B., Aviv C., Sepucha K., Esserman L. Training community resource center and clinic personnel to prompt patients in listing questions for doctors: follow-up interviews about barriers and facilitators to the implementation of consultation planning. Implement Sci 2008, 3:6.
18. Belkora J., Katapodi M., Moore D., Franklin L., Hopper K., Esserman L. Evaluation of a visit preparation intervention implemented in two rural, underserved counties of Northern California. Patient Educ Couns 2006, 64:350-359.
19. Minkler M., Wallerstein N. Community-based participatory research for health: from process to outcomes 2008, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. 2nd ed.
20. Israel B.A. Methods in community-based participatory research for health 2005, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. 1st ed.
21. Principles of community engagement 2011, National Institutes of Health. 2nd ed.
22. Belkora J., Stupar L., O'Donnell S. Using the critical incident technique in community-based participatory research: a case study. Prog Community Health Partnersh 2011, 5:443-451.
23. Franklin L., Belkora J., O'Donnell S., Elsbree D., Hardin J., Ingle B., et al. Consultation support for rural women with breast cancer: results of a community-based participatory research study. Patient Educ Couns 2010, 80:80-87.
24. Belkora J., Franklin L., O'Donnell S., Ohnemus J., Stacey D. Adaptation of consultation planning for native American and Latina women with breast cancer. J Rural Health 2009, 25:384-387.
25. Gil K.M., Mishel M.H., Belyea M., Germino B., Porter L.S., Clayton M. Benefits of the uncertainty management intervention for African American and White older breast cancer survivors: 20-month outcomes. Int J Behav Med 2006, 13:286-294.
26. Hawkins R.P., Pingree S., Shaw B., Serlin R.C., Swoboda C., Han J.Y., et al. Mediating processes of two communication interventions for breast cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns 2010, 81(Suppl):S48-S53.
27. Ormond K.E., Haun J., Cook L., Duquette D., Ludowese C., Methhews A.L. Recommendations for telephone counseling. J Genet Counsel 2000, 9:63-71.
28. Wang V.O. Commentary: what is and is not telephone counseling. J Genet Counsel 2000, 9:73-82.
29. Stacey D., Graham I.D., O'Connor A.M., Pomey M.P. Barriers and facilitators influencing call center nurses' decision support for callers facing values-sensitive decisions: a mixed methods study. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2005, 2:184-195.
30. Stacey D., Pomey M.P., O'Connor A.M., Graham I.D. Adoption and sustainability of decision support for patients facing health decisions: an implementation case study in nursing. Implement Sci 2006, 1:17.
31. Greenberg M.E., Schultz C. Telephone nursing: client experiences and perceptions. Nurs Econ 2002, 20:181-187.
32. McBride C.M., Rimer B.K. Using the telephone to improve health behavior and health service delivery. Patient Educ Couns 1999, 37:3-18.
33. Dale J., Caramlau I.O., Lindenmeyer A., Williams S.M. Peer support telephone calls for improving health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008, CD006903.
34. Helmes A.W., Culver J.O., Bowen D.J. Results of a randomized study of telephone versus in-person breast cancer risk counseling. Patient Educ Couns 2006, 64:96-103.
35. Campbell L., Watkins R.M., Teasdale C. Communicating the result of breast biopsy by telephone or in person. Br J Surg 1997, 84:1381.
36. Jenkins J., Calzone K.A., Dimond E., Liewehr D.J., Steinberg S.M., Jourkiv O., et al. Randomized comparison of phone versus in-person BRCA1/2 predisposition genetic test result disclosure counseling. Genet Med 2007, 9:487-495.
37. United States Census Bureau. Census of population and housing; 2000. http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2000/index.html.
38. California Department of Transportation. Mendocino county economic forecast. California 2005-2025 County-level economic forecast: Office of Transportation Economics; 2005. p. 3. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tpp/offices/ote/forecast2005/Mendocino%20Forecast.pdf.
39. United States Census Bureau. Census of population and housing; 2010. http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/index.html.
40. American Cancer Society California breast cancer facts and figures 2010, American Cancer Society, Oakland.
41. Belkora J. SLCTprocess.org. [accessed 17.11.11]. http://www.slctprocess.org/.
42. Belkora J. SCOPED.org. [accessed 17.11.11]. http://www.scoped.org/.
43. Belkora J. SCOPED prompt sheet. [accessed 17.11.11]. http://www.decisionservices.ucsf.edu/question-prompts/.
44. Belkora J. SCOPED Question list example. [accessed 17.11.11]. http://www.decisionservices.ucsf.edu/example-question-list/.
45. Piaggio G., Elbourne D.R., Altman D.G., Pocock S.J., Evans S.J. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. J Amer Med Assoc 2006, 295:1152-1160.
46. ClinicalTrials.gov. [accessed 17.11.11]. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/.
47. Dallal GE. Randomization.com. [accessed 11.09.07]. http://www.randomization.com/.
48. O'Connor Annette M. User manual - Decision Self-Efficacy Scale [document on the internet]. [accessed 31.05.11]. http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/User_Manuals/UM_Decision_SelfEfficacy.pdf.
49. Belkora JK. Mindful collaboration: prospect mapping as an action research approach to planning for medical consultations [Ph.D. Dissertation]. Stanford, CA: Stanford University; 1997. http://disexpress.umi.com/dxweb.
50. Sepucha K.R., Belkora J.K., Mutchnick S., Esserman L.J. Consultation planning to help breast cancer patients prepare for medical consultations: effect on communication and satisfaction for patients and physicians. J Clin Oncol 2002, 20:2695-2700.
51. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977, 84:191-215.
52. Theory at a glance: a guide for health promotion and practice 2005, National Cancer Institute, pp. 1-60. 2nd ed.
53. Grembowski D., Patrick D., Diehr P., Durham M., Beresford S., Kay E., et al. Self-efficacy and health behavior among older adults. J Health Soc Behav 1993, 34:89-104.
54. Strecher V.J., DeVellis B.M., Becker M.H., Rosenstock I.M. The role of self-efficacy in achieving health behavior change. Health Educ Q 1986, 13:73-92.
55. Ottawa Decsion Support Framework (ODSF). [accessed 24.03.12]. http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/odsf.html.
56. O'Connor A.M., Tugwell P., Wells G.A., Elmslie T., Jolly E., Hollingworth G., et al. A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation. Patient Educ Couns 1998, 33:267-279.
57. Allen J.D., Othus M.K., Hart A., Mohllajee A.P., Li Y., Bowen D. Do men make informed decisions about prostate cancer screening? Baseline results from the " take the wheel" trial. Med Decis Making 2011, 31:108-120.
58. Allen J.D., Othus M.K., Hart A., Tom L., Li Y., Berry D., et al. A randomized trial of a computer-tailored decision aid to improve prostate cancer screening decisions: results from the take the wheel trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010, 19:2172-2186.
59. Manne S.L., Meropol N.J., Weinberg D.S., Vig H., Ali-Khan Catts Z., Manning C., et al. Facilitating informed decisions regarding microsatellite instability testing among high-risk individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010, 28:1366-1372.
60. Fraenkel L., Rabidou N., Wittink D., Fried T. Improving informed decision-making for patients with knee pain. J Rheumatol 2007, 34:1894-1898.
61. Bastian L.A., McBride C.M., Fish L., Lyna P., Farrell D., Lipkus I.M., et al. Evaluating participants' use of a hormone replacement therapy decision-making intervention. Patient Educ Couns 2002, 48:283-291.
62. McBride C.M., Bastian L.A., Halabi S., Fish L., Lipkus I.M., Bosworth H.B., et al. A tailored intervention to aid decision-making about hormone replacement therapy. Am J Public Health 2002, 92:1112-1114.
63. Bunn H., O'Connor A. Validation of client decision-making instruments in the context of psychiatry. Can J Nurs Res 1996, 28:13-27.
64. Belkora J.K., O'Donnell S., Golant M., Hacking B. Involving and informing adults making cancer treatment decisions. International Congress of Behavioral Medicine 2010.
65. Spielberger C. State-trait anxiety inventory for adults, Form Y - review set 1983, Mind Garden, Inc., Redwood City, CA.
66. Attkisson C.C., Zwick R. The client satisfaction questionnaire: psychometric properties and correlations with service utilization and psychotherapy outcome. Eval Program Plann 1982, 5:233-237.
67. Graham I, O'Connor A. Preparation for Decision Making Scale. [accessed 11.05.11]. http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/User_Manuals/UM_PrepDM.pdf.
68. Drummond M.F. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes 2005, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York. 3rd ed.
69. Hanemann M., Loomis J., Kanninen B. Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Am J Agr Econ 1991, 73:1255-1263.
70. Neumann P.J., Cohen J.T., Hammitt J.K., Concannon T.W., Auerbach H.R., Fang C., et al. Willingness-to-pay for predictive tests with no immediate treatment implications: a survey of US residents. Health Econ 2010.
71. Glasgow R.E., Green L.W., Klesges L.M., Abrams D.B., Fisher E.B., Goldstein M.G., et al. External validity: we need to do more. Ann Behav Med 2006, 31:105-108.
72. Chow S.C., Shao J., Wang H. A note on sample size calculation for mean comparisons based on noncentral t-statistics. J Biopharm Stat 2002, 12:441-456.
73. Shrive F.M., Stuart H., Quan H., Ghali W.A. Dealing with missing data in a multi-question depression scale: a comparison of imputation methods. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006, 6:57.
74. Huisman M. Imputation of missing item responses: some simple techniques. Qual Quantity 2000, 34:331-351.
75. StataCorp Stata statistical software: release 10 2007, StataCorp LP, College Station, TX.
76. Thompson S.G., Barber J.A. How should cost data in pragmatic randomised trials be analysed?. Brit Med J 2000, 320:1197-1200.
77. Rimer B.K., Halabi S., Sugg Skinner C., Lipkus I.M., Strigo T.S., Kaplan E.B., et al. Effects of a mammography decision-making intervention at 12 and 24 months. Am J Prev Med 2002, 22:247-257.
78. Adler N.E., Page A.E.K. Cancer care for the whole patient: meeting psychosocial health needs 2008, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11993.html.
79. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Questions are the answer. [accessed 06.10.08]. http://www.ahrq.gov/questionsaretheanswer/questionBuilder.aspx.
80. United States Congress. H.R. 3590: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Section 3506. Program to facilitate shared decision making. Washington; 2010. pp. iii, 37. http://docs.house.gov/energycommerce/ppacacon.pdf.
81. Kuehn B.M. States explore shared decision making. J Amer Med Assoc 2009, 301:2539-2541.
82. United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality National healthcare quality report. AHRQ publication 2010, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, p. v. http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/qrdr10.htm.