Applying bi-objective shortest path methods to model cycle route-choice

32nd Australasian Transport Research Forum, ATRF 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Raith, Andrea ^a   Van Houtte, Chris ^a   Wang, Judith Y T ^b   Ehrgott, Matthias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND BUSINESS SCHOOL   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Bi objective shortest path methods; Cycle route choice; Traffic assignment

Indexed keywords

BI OBJECTIVES; BICYCLE LANES; CYCLE ROUTE-CHOICE; MONETARY VALUE; MULTIPLE OBJECTIVES; OPTIMAL ALTERNATIVE; PERSONAL PREFERENCES; PRIVATE VEHICLES; SHORTEST PATH; SHORTEST PATH METHOD; TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT; TRAFFIC SPEED; TRAFFIC VOLUMES; TRAVEL COSTS; TRAVEL DEMAND MODELS;

GRAPH THEORY; RESEARCH; SPORTING GOODS; TRAVEL TIME;

TRAFFIC CONTROL;

EID: 84866561675     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL (1998) Cycling and Walking Strategy. Auckland City.
2. AULTMAN-HALL, L., HALL, F. & BAETZ, B. (1997) Analysis of Bicycle Commuter Routes Using Geographical Information Systems: Implications for Bicycle Planning. Transportation Research Record, 1578, 102-110.
3. BUREAU OF PUBLIC ROADS (1964) Traffic Assignment Manual. IN U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; URBAN PLANNING DIVISION (Ed.). Washington D.C.
4. DILL, J. & CARR, T. (2003) Bicycle Commuting and Facilities in Major U.S. Cities: If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use Them. Transportation Research Record, 1828, 116-123.
5. FHWA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1992) Case Study No. 1: Reasons Why Bicycling and Walking Are Not Being Used More Extensively as Travel Modes.
6. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (2002) Quality /Level of Service Handbook. Tallahassee.
7. HARKEY, D., REINFURT, D. & KNUIMAN, M. (1998) Development of the Bicycle Compatibility Index: A Level of Service Concept. Transportation Research Record, 1636, 13-20.
8. INSTITUTION OF HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION (1998) Guidelines for Cycle Audit and Cycle Review.
9. LAND TRANSPORT SAFETY AUTHORITY (2004) Cycle Network and Route Planning Guide.
10. LANDIS, B., VATTIKUTI, V., OTTENBERG, R., PETRITSCH, T., GUTTENPLAN, M. & CRIDER, L. (2003) Intersection Level of Service for the Bicycle Through Movement. Transportation Research Record, 1828, 101-106.
11. LINGWOOD, P. (2004) Promoting walking and cycling as an alternative to using cars: Perception of safety is biggest obstacle BMJ, 329, 7476.
12. MORRIS, J. N. (1994) Exercise in the prevention of coronary heart disease: today's best buy in public health. Med Sci Sports Exercise, 26, 807 - 814.
13. OGILVIE, D., EGAN, M., HAMILTON, V. & PETTICREW, M. (2004) Promoting walking and cycling as an alternative to using cars: systematic review. BMJ, 329, 763.
14. RAITH, A. & EHRGOTT, M. (2009) A Comparison of Solution Strategies For Biobjective Shortest Path Problems. Computers and Operations Research, 1299-1331.
15. STINSON, M. A. & BHAT, C. R. (2003) Commuter Bicyclist Route Choice: Analysis Using a Stated Preference Survey. Transportation Research Record, 1828, 107-115.
16. WARDROP, J. G. (1952) Some Theoretical Aspects of Road Traffic Research. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Part II, 1, 325-362.