Inoculation of hybrid poplar with the endophytic bacterium Enterobacter sp. 638 increases biomass but does not impact leaf level physiology

GCB Bioenergy

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 364-370

  Rogers, Alistair ^a   McDonald, Kelly ^b   Muehlbauer, Megan F ^c   Hoffman, Adam ^a,e   Koenig, Kaitlyn ^d   Newman, Lee ^a,e   Taghavi, Safiyh ^a   Van Der Lelie, Daniel ^a,f  

^a BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b MARIST COLLEGE   (United States)

^c RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^f RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomass; Endophytic bacteria; Enterobacter sp. 638; Leaf area; Photosynthesis; Poplar

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA; BIOFUELS; BIOMASS; COTTON; ECOLOGY; EFFICIENCY; FEEDSTOCKS; FORESTRY; NITROGEN; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANTS (BOTANY); PRODUCTIVITY;

ENDOPHYTIC BACTERIA; ENTEROBACTER SP; LEAF AREA; LEAF NITROGEN CONTENT; OPERATING EFFICIENCY; POPLAR; PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENTS; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE;

NITROGEN FIXATION;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); ENTEROBACTER; ENTEROBACTER SP.; POPULUS; POPULUS DELTOIDES;

EID: 84866547800     PISSN: 17571693     EISSN: 17571707     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01119.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ainsworth EA, Rogers A, Leakey ADB, Heady LE, Gibon Y, Stitt M, Schurr U (2007) Does elevated atmospheric CO2 alter diurnal C uptake and the balance of C and N metabolites in growing and fully expanded soybean leaves? Journal of Experimental Botany, 58, 579-591.
2. 2. Plant Cell and Environment, 14, 869-875.
3. Baker NR (2008) Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe of photosynthesis in vivo. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 59, 89-113.
4. Bauen AW, Dunnett AJ, Richter GM, Dailey AG, Aylott M, Casella E, Taylor G (2010) Modelling supply and demand of bioenergy from short rotation coppice and Miscanthus in the UK. Bioresource Technology, 101, 8132-8143.
5. Bernacchi CJ, Leakey ADB, Heady LE et al. (2006) Hourly and seasonal variation in photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of soybean grown at future CO2 and ozone concentrations for 3 years under fully open-air field conditions. Plant Cell and Environment, 29, 2077-2090.
6. Buhler DD, Netzer DA, Riemenschneider DE, Hartzler RG (1998) Weed management in short rotation poplar and herbaceous perennial crops grown for biofuel production. Biomass & Bioenergy, 14, 385-394.
7. von Caemmerer S, Farquhar GD (1981) Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas-exchange of leaves. Planta, 153, 376-387.
8. Cho SM, Kang BR, Han SH et al. (2008) 2R,3R-butanediol, a bacterial volatile produced by Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6, is involved in induction of systemic tolerance to drought in Arabidopsis thaliana. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 21, 1067-1075.
9. Deckmyn G, Laureysens I, Garcia J, Muys B, Ceulemans R (2004) Poplar growth and yield in short rotation coppice: model simulations using the process model SECRETS. Biomass & Bioenergy, 26, 221-227.
10. Di Nasso NNO, Guidi W, Ragaglini G, Tozzini C, Bonari E (2010) Biomass production and energy balance of a 12-year-old short-rotation coppice poplar stand under different cutting cycles. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 2, 89-97.
11. Erickson RO, Michelini FJ (1957) The plastochron index. American Journal of Botany, 44, 297-305.
12. Garten CT, Wullschleger SD, Classen AT (2011) Review and model-based analysis of factors influencing soil carbon sequestration under hybrid poplar. Biomass & Bioenergy, 35, 214-226.
13. Glickmann E, Dessaux Y (1995) A critical examination of the specificity of the Salkowski reagent for indolic compounds produced by phytopathogenic bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 61, 793-796.
14. Heaton EA, Dohleman FG, Long SP (2008) Meeting US biofuel goals with less land: the potential of Miscanthus. Global Change Biology, 14, 2000-2014.
15. Karp A, Shield I (2008) Bioenergy from plants and the sustainable yield challenge. New Phytologist, 179, 15-32.
16. van der LelD, Taghavi S, Monchy S et al. (2009) Poplar and its bacterial endophytes: coexistence and harmony. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 28, 346-358.
17. Lynd LR, Laser MS, Brandsby D et al. (2008) How biotech can transform biofuels. Nature Biotechnology, 26, 169-172.
18. Proe MF, Craig J, Griffiths J, Wilson A, Reid E (1999) Comparison of biomass production in coppice and single stem woodland management systems on an imperfectly drained gley soil in central Scotland. Biomass & Bioenergy, 17, 141-151.
19. Rogers A, Allen DJ, Davey PA et al. (2004) Leaf photosynthesis and carbohydrate dynamics of soybeans grown throughout their life-cycle under free-air carbon dioxide enrichment. Plant Cell and Environment, 27, 449-458.
20. Ryan RP, Germaine K, Franks A, Ryan DJ, Dowling DN (2008) Bacterial endophytes: recent developments and applications. Fems Microbiology Letters, 278, 1-9.
21. Ryu CM, Farag MA, Hu CH, Reddy MS, Wei HX, Pare PW, Kloepper JW (2003) Bacterial volatiles promote growth in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 4927-4932.
22. Schatz A, Bovell C (1952) Growth and hydrogenase activity of a new bacterium, Hydrogenomonas facilis. Journal of Bacteriology, 63, 87-98.
23. Somerville C, Youngs H, Taylor C, Davis SC, Long SP (2010) Feedstocks for lignocellulosic biofuels. Science, 329, 790-792.
24. Taghavi S, Garafola C, Monchy S et al. (2009) Genome survey and characterization of endophytic bacteria exhibiting a beneficial effect on growth and development of poplar trees. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 75, 748-757.
25. Taghavi S, van der Lelie D, Hoffman A et al. (2010) Genome sequence of the plant growth promoting endophytic bacterium Enterobacter sp 638. PLoS Genetics, 6, e1000943.
26. Tuskan GA (1998) Short-rotation woody crop supply systems in the United States: What do we know and what do we need to know? Biomass & Bioenergy, 14, 307-315.
27. Weyens N, van der Lelie D, Artois T et al. (2009a) Bioaugmentation with engineered endophytic bacteria improves contaminant fate in phytoremediation. Environmental Science & Technology, 43, 9413-9418.
28. Weyens N, van der Lelie D, Taghavi S, Newman L, Vangronsveld J (2009b) Exploiting plant-microbe partnerships to improve biomass production and remediation. Trends in Biotechnology, 27, 591-598.