SUMOylation in control of accurate chromosome segregation during mitosis

Current Protein and Peptide Science

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 467-481

  Wan, Jun ^a   Subramonian, Divya ^a   Zhang, Xiang Dong ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Centromere; Chromosome segregation; Fibrous corona; Kinetochore; Mitosis; Spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC); SUMO interacting motif (SIM); SUMOylation

Indexed keywords

BUB1 RELATED PROTEIN; CELL PROTEIN; CENTROMERE PROTEIN E; DNA TOPOISOMERASE (ATP HYDROLYSING); PROTEIN NUF2; UBIQUITIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACCURACY; CENTROMERE; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONJUGATION; DAUGHTER CELL; HUMAN; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN DOMAIN; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SUMOYLATION;

ANIMALS; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; HUMANS; KINETOCHORES; MITOSIS; SUMO-1 PROTEIN; SUMOYLATION; UBIQUITIN;

EID: 84866543814     PISSN: 13892037     EISSN: 18755550     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/138920312802430563     Document Type: Review

References (160)

1. Holland, A.J.; Cleveland, D.W. Boveri revisited: chromosomal instability, aneuploidy and tumorigenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2009, 10 (7), 478-487.
2. Chandhok, N.S.; Pellman, D. A little CIN may cost a lot: revisiting aneuploidy and cancer. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 2009, 19 (1), 74-81.
3. Thompson, S.L.; Bakhoum, S.F.; Compton, D.A. Mechanisms of chromosomal instability. Curr. Biol., 2010, 20 (6), R285-295.
4. Verdaasdonk, J.S.; Bloom, K. Centromeres: unique chromatin structures that drive chromosome segregation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2011, 12 (5), 320-332.
5. Cheeseman, I.M.; Desai, A. Molecular architecture of the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2008, 9 (1), 33-46.
6. Ohta, S.; Bukowski-Wills, J.C.; Sanchez-Pulido, L.; Alves Fde, L.; Wood, L.; Chen, Z.A.; Platani, M.; Fischer, L.; Hudson, D.F.; Ponting, C.P.; Fukagawa, T.; Earnshaw, W.C.; Rappsilber, J. The protein composition of mitotic chromosomes determined using multiclassifier combinatorial proteomics. Cell, 2010, 142 (5), 810-821.
7. Stukenberg, P.T.; Foltz, D.R. Kinetochores: orchestrating the chromosomal minuet. Curr. Biol., 2010, 20 (12), R522-525.
8. Dasso, M. Emerging roles of the SUMO pathway in mitosis. Cell Div., 2008, 3, 5.
9. Mukhopadhyay, D.; Dasso, M. The fate of metaphase kinetochores is weighed in the balance of SUMOylation during S phase. Cell Cycle, 2010, 9 (16), 3194-3201.
10. Watts, F.Z. The role of SUMO in chromosome segregation. Chromosoma, 2007, 116 (1), 15-20.
11. Meluh, P.B.; Koshland, D. Evidence that the MIF2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a centromere protein with homology to the mammalian centromere protein CENP-C. Mol. Biol. Cell., 1995, 6 (7), 793-807.
12. Al-Khodairy, F.; Enoch, T.; Hagan, I.M.; Carr, A.M. The Schizosaccharomyces pombe hus5 gene encodes a ubiquitin conjugating enzyme required for normal mitosis. J. Cell Sci., 1995, 108, 475-486.
13. Seufert, W.; Futcher, B.; Jentsch, S. Role of a ubiquitinconjugating enzyme in degradation of S-and M-phase cyclins. Nature, 1995, 373 (6509), 78-81.
14. Li, S.J.; Hochstrasser, M. A new protease required for cell-cycle progression in yeast. Nature, 1999, 398 (6724), 246-251.
15. Li, S.J.; Hochstrasser, M. The yeast ULP2 (SMT4) gene encodes a novel protease specific for the ubiquitin-like Smt3 protein. Mol. Cell Biol., 2000, 20 (7), 2367-2377.
16. Shayeghi, M.; Doe, C.L.; Tavassoli, M.; Watts, F.Z. Characterisation of Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad31, a UBArelated gene required for DNA damage tolerance. Nucleic Acids Res., 1997, 25 (6), 1162-1169.
17. Biggins, S.; Bhalla, N.; Chang, A.; Smith, D.L.; Murray, A.W. Genes involved in sister chromatid separation and segregation in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics, 2001, 159 (2), 453-470.
18. Johnson, E.S. Protein modification by SUMO. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 2004, 73, 355-382.
19. Geiss-Friedlander, R.; Melchior, F. Concepts in sumoylation: a decade on. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2007, 8 (12), 947-956.
20. Gill, G. SUMO and ubiquitin in the nucleus: different functions, similar mechanisms? Genes Dev., 2004, 18 (17), 2046-2059.
21. Kerscher, O.; Felberbaum, R.; Hochstrasser, M. Modification of proteins by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 2006, 22, 159-180.
22. Hay, R.T. SUMO: a history of modification. Mol. Cell, 2005, 18 (1), 1-12.
23. Wang, Y.; Dasso, M. SUMOylation and deSUMOylation at a glance. J. Cell Sci., 2009, 122 (Pt 23), 4249-4252.
24. Zhao, J. Sumoylation regulates diverse biological processes. Cell Mol. Life Sci., 2007, 64 (23), 3017-3033.
25. Matunis, M.J.; Coutavas, E.; Blobel, G. A novel ubiquitin-like modification modulates the partitioning of the Ran-GTPaseactivating protein RanGAP1 between the cytosol and the nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Biol., 1996, 135 (6 Pt 1), 1457-1470.
26. Mahajan, R.; Delphin, C.; Guan, T.; Gerace, L.; Melchior, F. A small ubiquitin-related polypeptide involved in targeting RanGAP1 to nuclear pore complex protein RanBP2. Cell, 1997, 88 (1), 97-107.
27. Mukhopadhyay, D.; Dasso, M. Modification in reverse: the SUMO proteases. Trends Biochem. Sci., 2007, 32 (6), 286-295.
28. Yeh, E.T. SUMOylation and De-SUMOylation: wrestling with life's processes. J. Biol. Chem., 2009, 284 (13), 8223-8227.
29. Gong, L.; Millas, S.; Maul, G.G.; Yeh, E.T. Differential regulation of sentrinized proteins by a novel sentrin-specific protease. J. Biol. Chem., 2000, 275 (5), 3355-3359.
30. Johnson, E.S.; Schwienhorst, I.; Dohmen, R.J.; Blobel, G. The ubiquitin-like protein Smt3p is activated for conjugation to other proteins by an Aos1p/Uba2p heterodimer. Embo J., 1997, 16 (18), 5509-5519.
31. Johnson, E.S.; Blobel, G. Ubc9p is the conjugating enzyme for the ubiquitin-like protein Smt3p. J. Biol. Chem., 1997, 272 (43), 26799-26802.
32. Lee, G.W.; Melchior, F.; Matunis, M.J.; Mahajan, R.; Tian, Q.; Anderson, P. Modification of Ran GTPase-activating protein by the small ubiquitin-related modifier SUMO-1 requires Ubc9, an E2-type ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme homologue. J. Biol. Chem., 1998, 273 (11), 6503-6507.
33. Saitoh, H.; Sparrow, D.B.; Shiomi, T.; Pu, R.T.; Nishimoto, T.; Mohun, T.J.; Dasso, M. Ubc9p and the conjugation of SUMO-1 to RanGAP1 and RanBP2. Curr. Biol., 1998, 8 (2), 121-124.
34. Desterro, J.M.; Thomson, J.; Hay, R.T. Ubch9 conjugates SUMO but not ubiquitin. FEBS Lett., 1997, 417 (3), 297-300.
35. Hochstrasser, M. SP-RING for SUMO: new functions bloom for a ubiquitin-like protein. Cell, 2001, 107 (1), 5-8.
36. Melchior, F.; Schergaut, M.; Pichler, A. SUMO: ligases, isopeptidases and nuclear pores. Trends Biochem. Sci., 2003, 28 (11), 612-618.
37. Sampson, D.A.; Wang, M.; Matunis, M.J. The small ubiquitin-like modifier-1 (SUMO-1) consensus sequence mediates Ubc9 binding and is essential for SUMO-1 modification. J. Biol. Chem., 2001, 276 (24), 21664-21669.
38. Bernier-Villamor, V.; Sampson, D.A.; Matunis, M.J.; Lima, C.D. Structural basis for E2-mediated SUMO conjugation revealed by a complex between ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Ubc9 and RanGAP1. Cell, 2002, 108 (3), 345-356.
39. Rodriguez, M.S.; Dargemont, C.; Hay, R.T. SUMO-1 conjugation in vivo requires both a consensus modification motif and nuclear targeting. J. Biol. Chem., 2001, 276 (16), 12654-12659.
40. Matic, I.; Schimmel, J.; Hendriks, I.A.; van Santen, M.A.; van de Rijke, F.; van Dam, H.; Gnad, F.; Mann, M.; Vertegaal, A.C. Sitespecific identification of SUMO-2 targets in cells reveals an inverted SUMOylation motif and a hydrophobic cluster SUMOylation motif. Mol. Cell, 2010, 39 (4), 641-652.
41. Blomster, H.A.; Hietakangas, V.; Wu, J.; Kouvonen, P.; Hautaniemi, S.; Sistonen, L. Novel proteomics strategy brings insight into the prevalence of SUMO-2 target sites. Mol. Cell Proteomics, 2009, 8 (6), 1382-1390.
42. Yunus, A.A.; Lima, C.D. Structure of the Siz/PIAS SUMO E3 ligase Siz1 and determinants required for SUMO modification of PCNA. Mol. Cell, 2009, 35 (5), 669-682.
43. Johnson, E.S.; Gupta, A.A. An E3-like factor that promotes SUMO conjugation to the yeast septins. Cell, 2001, 106 (6), 735-744.
44. Takahashi, Y.; Kahyo, T.; Toh, E.A.; Yasuda, H.; Kikuchi, Y. Yeast Ull1/Siz1 is a novel SUMO1/Smt3 ligase for septin components and functions as an adaptor between conjugating enzyme and substrates. J. Biol. Chem., 2001, 276 (52), 48973-48977.
45. Potts, P.R.; Yu, H. Human MMS21/NSE2 is a SUMO ligase required for DNA repair. Mol. Cell Biol., 2005, 25 (16), 7021-7032.
46. Zhao, X.; Blobel, G. A SUMO ligase is part of a nuclear multiprotein complex that affects DNA repair and chromosomal organization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2005, 102 (13), 4777-4782.
47. Cheng, C.H.; Lo, Y.H.; Liang, S.S.; Ti, S.C.; Lin, F.M.; Yeh, C.H.; Huang, H.Y.; Wang, T.F. SUMO modifications control assembly of synaptonemal complex and polycomplex in meiosis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev., 2006, 20 (15), 2067-2081.
48. Sharma, M.; Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Zarnegar, M.; Huang, C.Y.; Palvimo, J.J.; Lim, B.; Sun, Z. hZimp10 is an androgen receptor co-activator and forms a complex with SUMO-1 at replication foci. Embo J., 2003, 22 (22), 6101-6114.
49. Pichler, A.; Gast, A.; Seeler, J.S.; Dejean, A.; Melchior, F. The nucleoporin RanBP2 has SUMO1 E3 ligase activity. Cell, 2002, 108 (1), 109-120.
50. Kagey, M.H.; Melhuish, T.A.; Wotton, D. The polycomb protein Pc2 is a SUMO E3. Cell, 2003, 113 (1), 127-137.
51. Zhao, X.; Sternsdorf, T.; Bolger, T.A.; Evans, R.M.; Yao, T.P. Regulation of MEF2 by histone deacetylase 4-and SIRT1 deacetylase-mediated lysine modifications. Mol. Cell Biol., 2005, 25 (19), 8456-8464.
52. Gregoire, S.; Yang, X.J. Association with class IIa histone deacetylases upregulates the sumoylation of MEF2 transcription factors. Mol. Cell Biol., 2005, 25 (6), 2273-2287.
53. Gao, C.; Ho, C.C.; Reineke, E.; Lam, M.; Cheng, X.; Stanya, K.J.; Liu, Y.; Chakraborty, S.; Shih, H.M.; Kao, H.Y. Histone deacetylase 7 promotes PML sumoylation and is essential for PML nuclear body formation. Mol. Cell Biol., 2008, 28 (18), 5658-5667.
54. Weger, S.; Hammer, E.; Heilbronn, R. Topors acts as a SUMO-1 E3 ligase for p53 in vitro and in vivo. FEBS Lett., 2005, 579 (22), 5007-5012.
55. Hammer, E.; Heilbronn, R.; Weger, S. The E3 ligase Topors induces the accumulation of polysumoylated forms of DNA topoisomerase I in vitro and in vivo. FEBS Lett., 2007, 581 (28), 5418-5424.
56. Pungaliya, P.; Kulkarni, D.; Park, H.J.; Marshall, H.; Zheng, H.; Lackland, H.; Saleem, A.; Rubin, E.H. TOPORS functions as a SUMO-1 E3 ligase for chromatin-modifying proteins. J. Proteome Res., 2007, 6 (10), 3918-3923.
57. Hay, R.T. SUMO-specific proteases: a twist in the tail. Trends Cell Biol., 2007, 17 (8), 370-376.
58. Panse, V.G.; Kuster, B.; Gerstberger, T.; Hurt, E. Unconventional tethering of Ulp1 to the transport channel of the nuclear pore complex by karyopherins. Nat. Cell Biol., 2003, 5 (1), 21-27.
59. Stade, K.; Vogel, F.; Schwienhorst, I.; Meusser, B.; Volkwein, C.; Nentwig, B.; Dohmen, R.J.; Sommer, T. A lack of SUMO conjugation affects cNLS-dependent nuclear protein import in yeast. J. Biol. Chem., 2002, 277 (51), 49554-49561.
60. Panse, V.G.; Kressler, D.; Pauli, A.; Petfalski, E.; Gnadig, M.; Tollervey, D.; Hurt, E. Formation and nuclear export of preribosomes are functionally linked to the small-ubiquitin-related modifier pathway. Traffic, 2006, 7 (10), 1311-1321.
61. Bachant, J.; Alcasabas, A.; Blat, Y.; Kleckner, N.; Elledge, S.J. The SUMO-1 isopeptidase Smt4 is linked to centromeric cohesion through SUMO-1 modification of DNA topoisomerase II. Mol. Cell, 2002, 9 (6), 1169-1182.
62. Bylebyl, G.R.; Belichenko, I.; Johnson, E.S. The SUMO isopeptidase Ulp2 prevents accumulation of SUMO chains in yeast. J. Biol. Chem., 2003, 278 (45), 44113-44120.
63. Li, S.J.; Hochstrasser, M. The Ulp1 SUMO isopeptidase: distinct domains required for viability, nuclear envelope localization, and substrate specificity. J. Cell Biol., 2003, 160 (7), 1069-1081.
64. Reverter, D.; Lima, C.D. A basis for SUMO protease specificity provided by analysis of human Senp2 and a Senp2-SUMO complex. Structure, 2004, 12 (8), 1519-1531.
65. Shen, L.N.; Dong, C.; Liu, H.; Naismith, J.H.; Hay, R.T. The structure of SENP1-SUMO-2 complex suggests a structural basis for discrimination between SUMO paralogues during processing. Biochem. J., 2006, 397 (2), 279-288.
66. Xu, Z.; Au, S.W. Mapping residues of SUMO precursors essential in differential maturation by SUMO-specific protease, SENP1. Biochem. J., 2005, 386 (Pt 2), 325-330.
67. Bailey, D.; O'Hare, P. Characterization of the localization and proteolytic activity of the SUMO-specific protease, SENP1. J. Biol. Chem., 2004, 279 (1), 692-703.
68. Hang, J.; Dasso, M. Association of the human SUMO-1 protease SENP2 with the nuclear pore. J. Biol. Chem., 2002, 277 (22), 19961-19966.
69. Zhang, H.; Saitoh, H.; Matunis, M.J. Enzymes of the SUMO modification pathway localize to filaments of the nuclear pore complex. Mol. Cell Biol., 2002, 22 (18), 6498-6508.
70. Goeres, J.; Chan, P.K.; Mukhopadhyay, D.; Zhang, H.; Raught, B.; Matunis, M.J. The SUMO-specific isopeptidase SENP2 associates dynamically with nuclear pore complexes through interactions with karyopherins and the Nup107-160 nucleoporin subcomplex. Mol. Biol. Cell, 2011, 22 (24), 4868-4882.
71. Di Bacco, A.; Ouyang, J.; Lee, H.Y.; Catic, A.; Ploegh, H.; Gill, G. The SUMO-specific protease SENP5 is required for cell division. Mol. Cell Biol., 2006, 26 (12), 4489-4498.
72. Gong, L.; Yeh, E.T. Characterization of a family of nucleolar SUMO-specific proteases with preference for SUMO-2 or SUMO-3. J. Biol. Chem., 2006, 281 (23), 15869-15877.
73. Yun, C.; Wang, Y.; Mukhopadhyay, D.; Backlund, P.; Kolli, N.; Yergey, A.; Wilkinson, K.D.; Dasso, M. Nucleolar protein B23/nucleophosmin regulates the vertebrate SUMO pathway through SENP3 and SENP5 proteases. J. Cell Biol., 2008, 183 (4), 589-595.
74. Lima, C.D.; Reverter, D. Structure of the human SENP7 catalytic domain and poly-SUMO deconjugation activities for SENP6 and SENP7. J. Biol. Chem., 2008, 283 (46), 32045-32055.
75. Mukhopadhyay, D.; Ayaydin, F.; Kolli, N.; Tan, S.H.; Anan, T.; Kametaka, A.; Azuma, Y.; Wilkinson, K.D.; Dasso, M. SUSP1 antagonizes formation of highly SUMO2/3-conjugated species. J. Cell Biol., 2006, 174 (7), 939-949.
76. Zhang, X.D.; Goeres, J.; Zhang, H.; Yen, T.J.; Porter, A.C.; Matunis, M.J. SUMO-2/3 modification and binding regulate the association of CENP-E with kinetochores and progression through mitosis. Mol. Cell, 2008, 29 (6), 729-741.
77. Azuma, Y.; Arnaoutov, A.; Anan, T.; Dasso, M. PIASy mediates SUMO-2 conjugation of Topoisomerase-II on mitotic chromosomes. Embo J., 2005, 24 (12), 2172-2182.
78. Nie, M.; Xie, Y.; Loo, J.A.; Courey, A.J. Genetic and proteomic evidence for roles of Drosophila SUMO in cell cycle control, Ras signaling, and early pattern formation. PLoS ONE, 2009, 4 (6), e5905.
79. McEwen, B.F.; Dong, Y. Contrasting models for kinetochore microtubule attachment in mammalian cells. Cell Mol. Life Sci., 2010, 67 (13), 2163-2172.
80. Cleveland, D.W.; Mao, Y.; Sullivan, K.F. Centromeres and kinetochores: from epigenetics to mitotic checkpoint signaling. Cell, 2003, 112 (4), 407-421.
81. Joseph, J.; Tan, S.H.; Karpova, T.S.; McNally, J.G.; Dasso, M. SUMO-1 targets RanGAP1 to kinetochores and mitotic spindles. J. Cell Biol., 2002, 156 (4), 595-602.
82. Azuma, Y.; Arnaoutov, A.; Dasso, M. SUMO-2/3 regulates topoisomerase II in mitosis. J. Cell Biol., 2003, 163 (3), 477-487.
83. Fukagawa, T.; Regnier, V.; Ikemura, T. Creation and characterization of temperature-sensitive CENP-C mutants in vertebrate cells. Nucleic Acids Res., 2001, 29 (18), 3796-3803.
84. Ban, R.; Nishida, T.; Urano, T. Mitotic kinase Aurora-B is regulated by SUMO-2/3 conjugation/deconjugation during mitosis. Genes Cells, 2011, 16 (6), 652-669.
85. Fernandez-Miranda, G.; Perez de Castro, I.; Carmena, M.; Aguirre-Portoles, C.; Ruchaud, S.; Fant, X.; Montoya, G.; Earnshaw, W.C.; Malumbres, M. SUMOylation modulates the function of Aurora-B kinase. J. Cell Sci., 2010, 123 (Pt 16), 2823-2833.
86. Klein, U.R.; Haindl, M.; Nigg, E.A.; Muller, S. RanBP2 and SENP3 function in a mitotic SUMO2/3 conjugation-deconjugation cycle on Borealin. Mol. Biol. Cell, 2009, 20 (1), 410-418.
87. Ryu, H.; Furuta, M.; Kirkpatrick, D.; Gygi, S.P.; Azuma, Y. PIASy-dependent SUMOylation regulates DNA topoisomerase IIalpha activity. J. Cell Biol., 2010, 191 (4), 783-794.
88. Mukhopadhyay, D.; Arnaoutov, A.; Dasso, M. The SUMO protease SENP6 is essential for inner kinetochore assembly. J. Cell Biol., 2010, 188 (5), 681-692.
89. Yang, F.; Hu, L.; Chen, C.; Yu, J.; O'Connell, C.B.; Khodjakov, A.; Pagano, M.; Dai, W. BubR1 Is Modified by Sumoylation during Mitotic Progression. J. Biol. Chem., 2011, 287 (7), 4875-4882.
90. Matunis, M.J.; Wu, J.; Blobel, G. SUMO-1 modification and its role in targeting the Ran GTPase-activating protein, RanGAP1, to the nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Biol., 1998, 140 (3), 499-509.
91. Mahajan, R.; Gerace, L.; Melchior, F. Molecular characterization of the SUMO-1 modification of RanGAP1 and its role in nuclear envelope association. J. Cell Biol., 1998, 140 (2), 259-270.
92. Joseph, J.; Liu, S.T.; Jablonski, S.A.; Yen, T.J.; Dasso, M. The RanGAP1-RanBP2 complex is essential for microtubulekinetochore interactions in vivo. Curr. Biol., 2004, 14 (7), 611-617.
93. Christensen, M.O.; Larsen, M.K.; Barthelmes, H.U.; Hock, R.; Andersen, C.L.; Kjeldsen, E.; Knudsen, B.R.; Westergaard, O.; Boege, F.; Mielke, C. Dynamics of human DNA topoisomerases IIalpha and IIbeta in living cells. J. Cell Biol., 2002, 157 (1), 31-44.
94. Tavormina, P.A.; Come, M.G.; Hudson, J.R.; Mo, Y.Y.; Beck, W.T.; Gorbsky, G.J. Rapid exchange of mammalian topoisomerase II alpha at kinetochores and chromosome arms in mitosis. J. Cell Biol., 2002, 158 (1), 23-29.
95. Lee, M.T.; Bachant, J. SUMO modification of DNA topoisomerase II: trying to get a CENse of it all. DNA Repair (Amst), 2009, 8 (4), 557-568.
96. Musacchio, A.; Salmon, E.D. The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2007, 8 (5), 379-393.
97. Yanagida, M. Clearing the way for mitosis: is cohesin a target? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2009, 10 (7), 489-496.
98. Porter, A.C.; Farr, C.J. Topoisomerase II: untangling its contribution at the centromere. Chromosome Res., 2004, 12 (6), 569-583.
99. Takahashi, Y.; Yong-Gonzalez, V.; Kikuchi, Y.; Strunnikov, A. SIZ1/SIZ2 control of chromosome transmission fidelity is mediated by the sumoylation of topoisomerase II. Genetics, 2006, 172 (2), 783-794.
100. Agostinho, M.; Santos, V.; Ferreira, F.; Costa, R.; Cardoso, J.; Pinheiro, I.; Rino, J.; Jaffray, E.; Hay, R.T.; Ferreira, J. Conjugation of human topoisomerase 2 alpha with small ubiquitinlike modifiers 2/3 in response to topoisomerase inhibitors: cell cycle stage and chromosome domain specificity. Cancer Res., 2008, 68 (7), 2409-2418.
101. Diaz-Martinez, L.A.; Gimenez-Abian, J.F.; Azuma, Y.; Guacci, V.; Gimenez-Martin, G.; Lanier, L.M.; Clarke, D.J. PIASgamma is required for faithful chromosome segregation in human cells. PLoS ONE, 2006, 1, e53.
102. Dawlaty, M.M.; Malureanu, L.; Jeganathan, K.B.; Kao, E.; Sustmann, C.; Tahk, S.; Shuai, K.; Grosschedl, R.; van Deursen, J.M. Resolution of sister centromeres requires RanBP2-mediated SUMOylation of topoisomerase IIalpha. Cell, 2008, 133 (1), 103-115.
103. Ryu, H.; Azuma, Y. Rod/Zw10 complex is required for PIASydependent centromeric SUMOylation. J. Biol. Chem., 2010, 285 (42), 32576-32585.
104. Ruchaud, S.; Carmena, M.; Earnshaw, W.C. Chromosomal passengers: conducting cell division. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2007, 8 (10), 798-812.
105. Carmena, M.; Earnshaw, W.C. The cellular geography of aurora kinases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2003, 4 (11), 842-854.
106. DeLuca, J.G.; Gall, W.E.; Ciferri, C.; Cimini, D.; Musacchio, A.; Salmon, E.D. Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and attachment stability are regulated by Hec1. Cell, 2006, 127 (5), 969-982.
107. Montpetit, B.; Hazbun, T.R.; Fields, S.; Hieter, P. Sumoylation of the budding yeast kinetochore protein Ndc10 is required for Ndc10 spindle localization and regulation of anaphase spindle elongation. J. Cell Biol., 2006, 174 (5), 653-663.
108. Perpelescu, M.; Fukagawa, T. The ABCs of CENPs. Chromosoma, 2011, 120 (5), 425-446.
109. Okada, M.; Cheeseman, I.M.; Hori, T.; Okawa, K.; McLeod, I.X.; Yates, J.R., 3rd; Desai, A.; Fukagawa, T. The CENP-H-I complex is required for the efficient incorporation of newly synthesized CENP-A into centromeres. Nat. Cell Biol., 2006, 8 (5), 446-457.
110. Cheeseman, I.M.; Hori, T.; Fukagawa, T.; Desai, A. KNL1 and the CENP-H/I/K complex coordinately direct kinetochore assembly in vertebrates. Mol. Biol. Cell, 2008, 19 (2), 587-594.
111. Cheeseman, I.M.; Chappie, J.S.; Wilson-Kubalek, E.M.; Desai, A. The conserved KMN network constitutes the core microtubulebinding site of the kinetochore. Cell, 2006, 127 (5), 983-997.
112. Nishihashi, A.; Haraguchi, T.; Hiraoka, Y.; Ikemura, T.; Regnier, V.; Dodson, H.; Earnshaw, W.C.; Fukagawa, T. CENP-I is essential for centromere function in vertebrate cells. Dev. Cell, 2002, 2 (4), 463-476.
113. Matunis, M.J.; Zhang, X.D.; Ellis, N.A. SUMO: the glue that binds. Dev. Cell, 2006, 11 (5), 596-597.
114. Kerscher, O. SUMO junction-what's your function? New insights through SUMO-interacting motifs. EMBO Rep., 2007, 8 (6), 550-555.
115. Chung, T.L.; Hsiao, H.H.; Yeh, Y.Y.; Shia, H.L.; Chen, Y.L.; Liang, P.H.; Wang, A.H.; Khoo, K.H.; Shoei-Lung Li, S. In vitro modification of human centromere protein CENP-C fragments by small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) protein: definitive identification of the modification sites by tandem mass spectrometry analysis of the isopeptides. J. Biol. Chem., 2004, 279 (38), 39653-39662.
116. Gao, X.; Chen, W.; Guo, C.; Qian, C.; Liu, G.; Ge, F.; Huang, Y.; Kitazato, K.; Wang, Y.; Xiong, S. Soluble cytoplasmic expression, rapid purification, and characterization of cyanovirin-N as a His-SUMO fusion. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2009, 85 (4), 1051-1060.
117. Peroutka, R.J.; Elshourbagy, N.; Piech, T.; Butt, T.R. Enhanced protein expression in mammalian cells using engineered SUMO fusions: secreted phospholipase A2. Protein Sci., 2008, 17 (9), 1586-1595.
118. Liu, L.; Spurrier, J.; Butt, T.R.; Strickler, J.E. Enhanced protein expression in the baculovirus/insect cell system using engineered SUMO fusions. Protein Expr. Purif., 2008, 62 (1), 21-28.
119. Guzzo, C.M.; Yang, D.C. Systematic analysis of fusion and affinity tags using human aspartyl-tRNA synthetase expressed in E. coli. Protein Expr. Purif., 2007, 54 (1), 166-175.
120. Marblestone, J.G.; Edavettal, S.C.; Lim, Y.; Lim, P.; Zuo, X.; Butt, T.R. Comparison of SUMO fusion technology with traditional gene fusion systems: enhanced expression and solubility with SUMO. Protein Sci., 2006, 15 (1), 182-189.
121. Liu, D.; Ding, X.; Du, J.; Cai, X.; Huang, Y.; Ward, T.; Shaw, A.; Yang, Y.; Hu, R.; Jin, C.; Yao, X. Human NUF2 interacts with centromere-associated protein E and is essential for a stable spindle microtubule-kinetochore attachment. J. Biol. Chem., 2007, 282 (29), 21415-21424.
122. Yao, X.; Abrieu, A.; Zheng, Y.; Sullivan, K.F.; Cleveland, D.W. CENP-E forms a link between attachment of spindle microtubules to kinetochores and the mitotic checkpoint. Nat. Cell Biol., 2000, 2 (8), 484-491.
123. Chan, G.K.; Schaar, B.T.; Yen, T.J. Characterization of the kinetochore binding domain of CENP-E reveals interactions with the kinetochore proteins CENP-F and hBUBR1. J. Cell Biol., 1998, 143 (1), 49-63.
124. Tooley, J.; Stukenberg, P.T. The Ndc80 complex: integrating the kinetochore's many movements. Chromosome Res., 2011, 19 (3), 377-391.
125. Ciferri, C.; Musacchio, A.; Petrovic, A. The Ndc80 complex: hub of kinetochore activity. FEBS Lett., 2007, 581 (15), 2862-2869.
126. Zhu, S.; Goeres, J.; Sixt, K.M.; Bekes, M.; Zhang, X.D.; Salvesen, G.S.; Matunis, M.J. Protection from isopeptidase-mediated deconjugation regulates paralog-selective sumoylation of RanGAP1. Mol. Cell, 2009, 33 (5), 570-580.
127. Putkey, F.R.; Cramer, T.; Morphew, M.K.; Silk, A.D.; Johnson, R.S.; McIntosh, J.R.; Cleveland, D.W. Unstable kinetochoremicrotubule capture and chromosomal instability following deletion of CENP-E. Dev. Cell, 2002, 3 (3), 351-365.
128. Wood, K.W.; Sakowicz, R.; Goldstein, L.S.; Cleveland, D.W. CENP-E is a plus end-directed kinetochore motor required for metaphase chromosome alignment. Cell, 1997, 91 (3), 357-366.
129. Yucel, J.K.; Marszalek, J.D.; McIntosh, J.R.; Goldstein, L.S.; Cleveland, D.W.; Philp, A.V. CENP-meta, an essential kinetochore kinesin required for the maintenance of metaphase chromosome alignment in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol., 2000, 150 (1), 1-11.
130. Kapoor, T.M.; Lampson, M.A.; Hergert, P.; Cameron, L.; Cimini, D.; Salmon, E.D.; McEwen, B.F.; Khodjakov, A. Chromosomes can congress to the metaphase plate before biorientation. Science, 2006, 311 (5759), 388-391.
131. Kim, Y.; Heuser, J.E.; Waterman, C.M.; Cleveland, D.W. CENP-E combines a slow, processive motor and a flexible coiled coil to produce an essential motile kinetochore tether. J. Cell Biol., 2008, 181 (3), 411-419.
132. Schaar, B.T.; Chan, G.K.; Maddox, P.; Salmon, E.D.; Yen, T.J. CENP-E function at kinetochores is essential for chromosome alignment. J. Cell Biol., 1997, 139 (6), 1373-1382.
133. Tatham, M.H.; Geoffroy, M.C.; Shen, L.; Plechanovova, A.; Hattersley, N.; Jaffray, E.G.; Palvimo, J.J.; Hay, R.T. RNF4 is a poly-SUMO-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase required for arsenicinduced PML degradation. Nat. Cell Biol., 2008, 10 (5), 538-546.
134. Lallemand-Breitenbach, V.; Jeanne, M.; Benhenda, S.; Nasr, R.; Lei, M.; Peres, L.; Zhou, J.; Zhu, J.; Raught, B.; de The, H. Arsenic degrades PML or PML-RARalpha through a SUMO-triggered RNF4/ubiquitin-mediated pathway. Nat. Cell Biol., 2008, 10 (5), 547-555.
135. Bruderer, R.; Tatham, M.H.; Plechanovova, A.; Matic, I.; Garg, A.K.; Hay, R.T. Purification and identification of endogenous polySUMO conjugates. EMBO Rep., 2011, 12 (2), 142-148.
136. Saitoh, H.; Pu, R.; Cavenagh, M.; Dasso, M. RanBP2 associates with Ubc9p and a modified form of RanGAP1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1997, 94 (8), 3736-3741.
137. Reverter, D.; Lima, C.D. Insights into E3 ligase activity revealed by a SUMO-RanGAP1-Ubc9-Nup358 complex. Nature, 2005, 435 (7042), 687-692.
138. Kalab, P.; Heald, R. The RanGTP gradient-a GPS for the mitotic spindle. J. Cell Sci., 2008, 121 (Pt 10), 1577-1586.
139. Macara, I.G. Transport into and out of the nucleus. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 2001, 65 (4), 570-594, table of contents.
140. Zuccolo, M.; Alves, A.; Galy, V.; Bolhy, S.; Formstecher, E.; Racine, V.; Sibarita, J.B.; Fukagawa, T.; Shiekhattar, R.; Yen, T.; Doye, V. The human Nup107-160 nuclear pore subcomplex contributes to proper kinetochore functions. Embo J., 2007, 26 (7), 1853-1864.
141. Arnaoutov, A.; Azuma, Y.; Ribbeck, K.; Joseph, J.; Boyarchuk, Y.; Karpova, T.; McNally, J.; Dasso, M. Crm1 is a mitotic effector of Ran-GTP in somatic cells. Nat. Cell Biol., 2005, 7 (6), 626-632.
142. Salina, D.; Enarson, P.; Rattner, J.B.; Burke, B. Nup358 integrates nuclear envelope breakdown with kinetochore assembly. J. Cell Biol., 2003, 162 (6), 991-1001.
143. Joo, H.Y.; Zhai, L.; Yang, C.; Nie, S.; Erdjument-Bromage, H.; Tempst, P.; Chang, C.; Wang, H. Regulation of cell cycle progression and gene expression by H2A deubiquitination. Nature, 2007, 449 (7165), 1068-1072.
144. Praefcke, G.J.; Hofmann, K.; Dohmen, R.J. SUMO playing tag with ubiquitin. Trends Biochem. Sci., 2011.
145. Schimmel, J.; Larsen, K.M.; Matic, I.; van Hagen, M.; Cox, J.; Mann, M.; Andersen, J.S.; Vertegaal, A.C. The ubiquitinproteasome system is a key component of the SUMO-2/3 cycle. Mol. Cell Proteomics, 2008.
146. Tatham, M.H.; Matic, I.; Mann, M.; Hay, R.T. Comparative proteomic analysis identifies a role for SUMO in protein quality control. Sci. Signal, 2011, 4 (178), rs4.
147. Vong, Q.P.; Cao, K.; Li, H.Y.; Iglesias, P.A.; Zheng, Y. Chromosome alignment and segregation regulated by ubiquitination of survivin. Science, 2005, 310 (5753), 1499-1504.
148. Pickart, C.M.; Fushman, D. Polyubiquitin chains: polymeric protein signals. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 2004, 8 (6), 610-616.
149. Desterro, J.M.; Rodriguez, M.S.; Hay, R.T. SUMO-1 modification of IkappaBalpha inhibits NF-kappaB activation. Mol. Cell, 1998, 2 (2), 233-239.
150. Ulrich, H.D. Mutual interactions between the SUMO and ubiquitin systems: a plea of no contest. Trends Cell Biol., 2005, 15 (10), 525-532.
151. Moldovan, G.L.; Pfander, B.; Jentsch, S. PCNA, the maestro of the replication fork. Cell, 2007, 129 (4), 665-679.
152. Topper, L.M.; Bastians, H.; Ruderman, J.V.; Gorbsky, G.J. Elevating the level of Cdc34/Ubc3 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme in mitosis inhibits association of CENP-E with kinetochores and blocks the metaphase alignment of chromosomes. J. Cell Biol., 2001, 154 (4), 707-717.
153. Yen, T.J.; Compton, D.A.; Wise, D.; Zinkowski, R.P.; Brinkley, B.R.; Earnshaw, W.C.; Cleveland, D.W. CENP-E, a novel human centromere-associated protein required for progression from metaphase to anaphase. Embo J., 1991, 10 (5), 1245-1254.
154. Brown, K.D.; Wood, K.W.; Cleveland, D.W. The kinesin-like protein CENP-E is kinetochore-associated throughout poleward chromosome segregation during anaphase-A. J. Cell Sci., 1996, 109 (Pt 5), 961-969.
155. Johnson, V.L.; Scott, M.I.; Holt, S.V.; Hussein, D.; Taylor, S.S. Bub1 is required for kinetochore localization of BubR1, Cenp-E, Cenp-F and Mad2, and chromosome congression. J. Cell Sci., 2004, 117 (Pt 8), 1577-1589.
156. Huang, Y.; Yao, Y.; Xu, H.Z.; Wang, Z.G.; Lu, L.; Dai, W. Defects in chromosome congression and mitotic progression in KIF18Adeficient cells are partly mediated through impaired functions of CENP-E. Cell Cycle, 2009, 8 (16), 2643-2649.
157. Wozniak, R.; Burke, B.; Doye, V. Nuclear transport and the mitotic apparatus: an evolving relationship. Cell Mol. Life Sci., 67 (13), 2215-2230.
158. Buffin, E.; Lefebvre, C.; Huang, J.; Gagou, M.E.; Karess, R.E. Recruitment of Mad2 to the kinetochore requires the Rod/Zw10 complex. Curr. Biol., 2005, 15 (9), 856-861.
159. Williams, B.C.; Li, Z.; Liu, S.; Williams, E.V.; Leung, G.; Yen, T.J.; Goldberg, M.L. Zwilch, a new component of the ZW10/ROD complex required for kinetochore functions. Mol. Biol. Cell, 2003, 14 (4), 1379-1391.
160. Karess, R. Rod-Zw10-Zwilch: a key player in the spindle checkpoint. Trends Cell Biol., 2005, 15 (7), 386-392.