Part of a system

Educational Leadership

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 30-34

  Wiliam, Dylan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866534824     PISSN: 00131784     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C-L C, Kuhk, J. A., & Morgan, M. ( 1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61( 2), 213-238.
2. Berger, J., & Pope, D. G. ( 2011). Can losing lead to winning? Management Science, 57( 5), 817-827.
3. Butler, R. ( 1987). Task-involving and egoinvolving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79( 4), 474-482.
4. Butler, R. ( 1988). Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation: The effects of task-involving and ego-involving evaluation on interest and performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 1-14.
5. Crooks, T. J. ( 1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58( 4), 438-481.
6. Dweck, C. S. ( 2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.
7. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a metaanalysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, IJ 9(2), 254-284. (Pubitemid 126042646)
8. Kulhavy, R. W. ( 1977). Feedback in written instruction. Review of Educational Research, 47( 2), 211-232.
9. Natriello, G. ( 1987). The impact of evaluation processes on students. Educational Psychologist, 22( 2), 155-175.
10. Tugend, A. ( 2011). Better by mistake: The unexpected benefits of being wrong. New York: Riverhead.