Capture of kinesthesis by a competing cutaneous input

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 74, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1539-1551

  van Doorn, George H ^a   Hohwy, Jakob ^b   Symmons, Mark A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BALLARAT   (Australia)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Attention; Haptics; Perception and action

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; KINESTHESIA; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; TOUCH;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; KINESTHESIS; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; ORIENTATION; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; STEREOGNOSIS; TOUCH; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84866525038     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: 1943393X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-012-0327-7     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Abbruzzese, G., Ratto, S., Favale, E., & Abbruzzese, M. (1981). Proprioceptive modulation of somatosensory evoked potentials during active or passive finger movements in man. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 44, 942-949.
2. Bergmann Tiest, W. M., van der Hoff, L. M. A., & Kappers, A. M. L. (2011). Proceedings of the IEEE World Haptics Conference (pp. 593-597). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
3. Bertelson, P., Vroomen, J., de Gelder, B., & Driver, J. (2000). The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of deliberate visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 321-332. doi: 10. 3758/BF03205552.
4. Blakemore, S.-J., Wolpert, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (1998). Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 635-640.
5. Calabro, F. J., Soto-Faraco, S., & Vaina, L. M. (2011). Acoustic facilitation of object movement detection during self-motion. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 278, 2840-2847.
6. Chabris, C. F., Weinberger, A., Fontaine, M., & Simons, D. J. (2011). You do not talk about Fight Club if you do not notice Fight Club: Inattentional blindness for a simulated real-world assault. i-Perception, 2, 150-153.
7. Colavita, F. B. (1974). Human sensory dominance. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 409-412.
8. Dodge, R. (1900). Visual perception during eye movement. Psychological Review, 7, 454-465.
9. Ernst, M. O. (2004). Multisensory integration: A late bloomer. Current Biology, 18, R519-R521.
10. Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415, 429-433. doi: 10. 1038/415429a.
11. Ernst, M. O., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2004). Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 162-169. doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2004. 02. 002.
12. Feldman, H., & Friston, K. J. (2010). Attention, uncertainty, and free-energy. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 215. doi: 10. 3389/fnhum. 2010. 00215.
13. Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 127-138.
14. Gallace, A., Zeeden, S., Röder, B., & Spence, C. (2010). Lost in the move? Secondary task performance impairs tactile change detection on the body. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 215-229. doi: 10. 1016/j. concog. 2009. 07. 003.
15. Hecht, D., Reiner, M., & Karni, A. (2008). Enhancement of response times to bi- and tri-modal sensory stimuli during active movements. Experimental Brain Research, 185, 655-665.
16. Helbig, H. B., & Ernst, M. O. (2007). Optimal integration of shape information from vision and touch. Experimental Brain Research, 179, 595-606. doi: 10. 1007/s00221-006-0814-y.
17. Heller, M. A., & Clyburn, S. (1993). Global versus local processing in haptic perception of form. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 574-576.
18. Juravle, G., & Spence, C. (2011). Juggling reveals a decisional component to tactile suppression. Experimental Brain Research, 213, 87-97.
19. Loomis, J. M., & Lederman, S. J. (1986). Tactual perception. In K. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 2, pp. 1-41). New York, NY: Wiley.
20. Magee, L. E., & Kennedy, J. M. (1980). Exploring pictures tactually. Nature, 283, 287-288.
21. Müller, M. M., & Giabbiconi, C. M. (2008). Attention in sense of touch. In M. Grunwald (Ed.), Human haptic perception: Basics and applications (pp. 199-206). Boston, MA: Birkhäuser Verlag.
22. Newell, F. N. (2004). Cross-modal object recognition. In G. Calvert, C. Spence, & B. Stein (Eds.), The handbook of multisensory processes (pp. 123-140). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Pick, H. L., Warren, D. H., & Hay, J. C. (1969). Sensory conflict in judgements of spatial direction. Perception & Psychophysics, 6, 203-205.
24. Pritchett, D., Gallace, A., & Spence, C. (2011). Implicit processing of tactile information: Evidence from the tactile change detection paradigm. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 534-546.
25. Sanabria, D., Soto-Faraco, S., & Spence, C. (2004). Exploring the role of visual perceptual grouping on the audiovisual integration of motion. NeuroReport, 15, 2745-2749.
26. Seki, K., Perlmutter, S. I., & Fetz, E. E. (2003). Sensory input to the primate spinal cord is presynaptically inhibited during voluntary movement. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 1309-1316.
27. Seno, T., Ito, H., & Sunaga, S. (2011). Inconsistent locomotion inhibits vection. Perception, 40, 747-750.
28. Sinnett, S., Spence, C., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2007). Visual dominance and attention: The Colavita effect revisited. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 673-686. doi: 10. 3758/BF03193770.
29. Spence, C. (2009). Explaining the Colavita visual dominance effect. Progress in Brain Research, 176, 245-258.
30. Stoeckel, M. C., Weder, B., Binkofski, F., Choi, H. J., Amunts, K., Pieperhoff, P., Seitz, R. J. (2004). Left and right superior parietal lobule in tactile object discrimination. European Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 1067-1072.
31. Sun, H. J., Campos, J. L., & Chan, G. S. (2004). Multisensory integration in the estimation of relative path length. Experimental Brain Research, 154, 246-254.
32. Symmons, M. A., Richardson, B. L., & Wuillemin, D. B. (2007). Intrasensory attention: Kinaesthetic versus cutaneous inputs. Perception, 36, 880-887. doi: 10. 1068/p5690.
33. Symmons, M. A., Richardson, B. L., & Wuillemin, D. B. (2008). Components of haptic information: Skin rivals kinaesthesis. Perception, 37, 1596-1604. doi: 10. 1068/p5855.
34. Talsma, D., Senkowski, D., Soto-Faraco, S., & Woldorff, M. G. (2010). The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 400-410. doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2010. 06. 008.
35. van Beers, R. J., Wolpert, D. M., & Haggard, P. (2002). When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation. Current Biology, 12, 834-837.
36. Voss, M., Ingram, J. N., Haggard, P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2006). Sensorimotor attenuation by central motor command signals in the absence of movement. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 26-27.
37. Wada, Y., Kitagawa, N., & Noguchi, K. (2003). Audio-visual integration in temporal perception. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 50, 117-124.
38. Ziat, M., Hayward, V., Chapman, C., Ernst, M., & Lenay, C. (2010). Tactile suppression of displacement. Experimental Brain Research, 206, 299-310.