Ultrasound weight estimation of large fetuses

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 91, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1218-1225

  Lindell, Gun ^a   KÄllén, Karin ^b   Maršál, Karel ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LUND   (Sweden)

Author keywords

fetal macrosomia; Fetal weight estimation; maternal bodyweight; three dimensional ultrasound; two dimensional ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ABDOMEN; ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; CALCULATION; FEMALE; FEMUR; FETUS; FETUS WEIGHT; HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LARGE FOR GESTATIONAL AGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SWEDEN; THIRD TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ULTRASOUND; VOLUMETRY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; FETAL MACROSOMIA; FETAL WEIGHT; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, THIRD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84866506899     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01495.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Henriksen T,. The macrosomic fetus: a challenge in current obstetrics. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008; 87: 134-45.
2. Orskou J, Kesmodel U, Brink Henriksen T, Secher NJ,. An increasing proportion of infants weigh more than 4000 grams at birth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001; 80: 931-6.
3. Chauhan SP, Grobman WA, Gherman RA, Chauhan VB, Chang G, Magann, EF, et al,. Suspicion and treatment of the macrosomic fetus: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 193: 332-46.
4. Surkan PJ, Hsieh C-C, Johansson ALV, Dickman PW, Cnattingius S,. Reasons for increasing trends in large for gestational age births. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 104: 720-6.
5. Boulet SL, Alexander GR, Salihu HM, Pass MA,. Macrosomic births in the United States: determinants, outcomes, and proposed grades of risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188: 1372-8.
6. Casey BM, Schaffer JI, Bloom SL, Heartwell SF, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ,. Obstetric antecendents for postpartum pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 192: 1655-62.
7. Dudley NJ,. A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 25: 80-9.
8. Persson P-H, Weldner B-M,. Intra-uterine weight curves obtained by ultrasound. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1986; 65: 169-73.
9. Hart NC, Hilbert A, Meurer B, Schrauder M, Schmid M, Siemer J, et al,. Macrosomia: a new formula for optimized fetal weight estimation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 35: 42-7.
10. Schild RL, Fimmers R, Hansmann M,. Fetal weight estimation by three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 16: 445-52.
11. Lee W, Deter RL, Ebersole JD, Huang R, Blanckaert K, Romero R,. Birth weight prediction by three-dimensional ultrasonography: fractional limb volume. J Ultrasound Med. 2001; 20: 1283-92.
12. Lee W, Deter RL, McNie B, Gonçalves LF, Espinoza J, Chiaworapongsa T, et al,. The fetal arm: individualized growth assessment in normal pregnancies. J Ultrasound Med. 2005; 24: 817-28.
13. Lee W, Balasubramaniam M, Deter RL, Yeo L, Hassan SS, Gotsch F, et al,. New fetal weight estimation models using fractional limb volume. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 34: 556-65.
14. Lindell G, Maršál K,. Sonographic fetal weight estimation in prolonged pregnancy: comparative study of two- and three-dimensional methods. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 33: 295-300.
15. Maršál K, Persson P-H, Larsen T, Lilja H, Selbing A, Sultan B,. Intrauterine growth curves based on ultrasonically estimated foetal weights. Acta Pædiatr. 1996; 85: 843-8.
16. Shepard M, Filly RA,. A standardized plane for biparietal diameter measurement. J Ultrasound Med. 1982; 1: 145-50.
17. Eik-Nes SH, Gröttum P, Persson P-H, Maršál K,. Prediction of fetal growth deviation by ultrasonic biometry. I. Methodology. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1982; 61: 53-8.
18. O'Brien GD, Queenan JT, Campbell S,. Assessment of gestational age in the second trimester by real-time ultrasound measurement of the femur length. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981; 139: 540-5.
19. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL,. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristics curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988; 44: 837-45.
20. Melamed N, Yogev Y, Meizner I, Mashiach R, Bardin R, Ben-Haroush A,. Sonographic fetal weight estimation. Which model should be used? J Ultrasound Med. 2009; 28: 617-29.
21. Mongelli M, Benzie R,. Ultrasound diagnosis of fetal macrosomia: a comparison of weight prediction models using computer simulation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 26: 500-3.
22. Sokol RJ, Chik L, Dombrowski MP, Zador IE,. Correctly identifying the macrosomic fetus: improving ultrasonography-based prediction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 182: 1489-95.
23. Halaska MG, Vlk R, Feldmar P, Hrehorcak M, Krcmar M, Mlcochova H, et al,. Predicting term birth weight using ultrasound and maternal characteristics. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006; 128: 231-5.
24. Schild RL,. Editorial: Three-dimensional volumetry and fetal weight measurement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 30: 799-803.
25. Hasenoehrl G, Pohlhammer A, Gruber R, Staudach A, Steiner H,. Fetal weight estimation by 2D and 3D ultrasound: comparison of six formulas. Ultraschall Med. 2009; 30: 585-90.
26. Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Hod M,. Fetal weight estimation in diabetic pregnancies and suspected fetal macrosomia. J Perinat Med. 2004; 32: 113-21.
27. Lee W, Balasubramaniam M, Deter RL, Hassan SS, Gotsch F, Kusanovic JP, et al,. Fractional limb volume-a soft tissue parameter of fetal body composition: validation, technical considerations and normal ranges during pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 33: 427-40.