Efficiently migrating stateful middleboxes

SIGCOMM'12 - Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2012 Conference Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 93-94

  Olteanu, Vladimir Andrei ^a   Raiciu, Costin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY POLITEHNICA OF BUCHAREST   (Romania)

Author keywords

middlebox; migration

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866498452     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2342356.2342376     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Openflow switch specification, version 1.0.0.
2. C. Clark and et al. Live migration of virtual machines. In Proc. NSDI, 2005.
3. A. Greenhalgh and et al. Flow processing and the rise of commodity network hardware. SIGCOMM CCR, 39(2):20-26, 2009.
4. S. Guha, K. Biswas, B. Ford, S. Sivakumar, and P. Srisuresh. NAT Behavioral Requirements for TCP. RFC 5382, Oct. 2008.
5. M. Honda, Y. Nishida, C. Raiciu, A. Greenhalgh, M. Handley, and H. Tokuda. Is it still possible to extend tcp? In ACM IMC, 2011.
6. E. Kohler, R. Morris, B. Chen, J. Jahnotti, and M. F. Kasshoek. The click modular router. ACM Transaction on Computer Systems, 18(3):263-297, 2000.
7. R. Lawrence. A survey of process migration mechanisms.
8. L. Peterson. Inter-as traffic patterns and their implications. In Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM, 1999.
9. V. Sekar and et al. The design and implementation of a consolidated middlebox architecture. In Proc. NSDI, 2012.