Distributed image search in camera sensor networks

SenSys'08 - Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 155-168

  Yan, Tingxin ^a   Ganesan, Deepak ^a   Manmatha, R ^a  

^a Biologically Inspired Neural and Dynamical Systems Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

camera sensor networks; distributed search; visterms; vocabulary tree

Indexed keywords

CAMERA SENSOR; CAMERA SENSOR NETWORK; CENTRAL SERVERS; COMPUTATIONAL NODES; COMPUTATIONAL POWER; DATA SETS; DISTRIBUTED SEARCH; DISTRIBUTED SEARCH ENGINES; DISTRIBUTED SEARCH SYSTEMS; DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS; FLASH STORAGE; IMAGE SEARCH; IMAGE SEARCH ENGINE; LOCAL SEARCH; LOW POWER; MEMORY CAPACITY; ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE; RESOURCE CONSTRAINT; RESOURCE LIMITATIONS; RESOURCE-RICH; VISTERMS; VOCABULARY TREE;

CAMERAS; DATA PROCESSING; EMBEDDED SYSTEMS; ENERGY UTILIZATION; IMAGE CODING; SEARCH ENGINES; SENSOR NETWORKS; SENSOR NODES;

DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EID: 84866494177     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1460412.1460428     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Enalab imote2 camera. http://enaweb.eng.yale.edu/drupal/. 2007.
2. H. Aghajan, J. Augusto, C. Wu, P. McCullagh, and J. Walkden. Distributed vision-based accident management for assisted living. In ICOST, pages 196-205, 2007.
3. R. Baeza-Yates and B. Ribeiro-Neto. Modern Information Retrieval. ACM Press, 1999.
4. H. Dai, M. Neufeld, and R. Han. ELF: an efficient log-structured flash file system for micro sensor nodes. In ACM SenSys '04, pages 176-187, 2004.
5. A. Deshpande, C. Guestrin, S. Madden, J. M. Hellerstein, and W. Hong. Model-driven data acquisition in sensor networks. In VLDB, pages 588-599, 2004.
6. S. Feng, R. Manmatha, and V. Lavrenko. Multiple Bernoulli relevance models for image and video annotation. In IEEE CVPR, pages 1002-1009, 2004.
7. S. Gaonkar, J. Li, R. R. Choudhury, L. Cox, and A. Schmidt. Micro-blog: Sharing and querying content through mobile phones and social participation. In ACM MobiSys, pages 174-186, 2008.
8. R. Goshorn, J. Goshorn, D. Goshorn, and H. Aghajan. Architecture for cluster-based automated surveillance network for detecting and tracking multiple persons. In ICDSC, 2007.
9. J. Hellerstein, W. Hong, S. Madden, and K. Stanek. Beyond average: Towards sophisticated sensing with queries. In IPSN '03, pages 63-79, 2003.
10. S. Hengstler, D. Prashanth, S. Fong, and H. Aghajan. Mesheye: A hybrid-resolution smart camera mote for applications in distributed intelligent surveillance. In IPSN-SPOTS, pages 360-369, 2007.
11. J. W. Hui and D. Culler. The dynamic behavior of a data dissemination protocol for network programming at scale. In ACM SenSys, pages 81-94, 2004.
12. http://www.intel.com/research/exploratory/motes.htm. Intel imote2.
13. A. Kansal, M. Goraczko, and F. Zhao. Building a sensor network of mobile phones. In IPSN, pages 547-548, 2007.
14. T. Ko, Z. M. Charbiwala, S. Ahmadian, M. Rahimi, M. B. Srivastava, S. Soatto, and D. Estrin. Exploring tradeoffs in accuracy, energy and latency of scale invariant feature transform in wireless camera networks. In ICDSC, 2007.
15. http://people.csail.mit.edu/kkl/libpmk/. LIBPMK: A Pyramid Match Toolkit.
16. D. G. Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. In in International Journal of Computer Vision, 60, 2004, pages 91-110, 2004.
17. D. Lymberopoulos, A. S. Ogale, A. Savvides, and Y. Aloimonos. A sensory grammar for inferring behaviors in sensor networks. In IPSN, pages 251-259, 2006.
18. M. Rahimi and R. Baer and O. I. Iroezi and J. C. Garcia and J. Warrior and D. Estrin and M. Srivastava. Cyclops: In situ Image Sensing and Interpretation in Wireless Sensor Networks. In ACM Sensys, pages 192-204, 2005.
19. S. Madden, M. Franklin, J. Hellerstein, and W. Hong. TAG: a tiny aggregation service for ad-hoc sensor networks. In OSDI, Boston, MA, 2002.
20. G. Mathur, P. Desnoyers, D. Ganesan, and P. Shenoy. Capsule: An energy-optimized object storage system for memory-constrained sensor devices. In SenSys, pages 195-208, 2006.
21. G. Mathur, P. Desnoyers, D. Ganesan, and P. Shenoy. Ultra-low power data storage for sensor networks. In IPSN-SPOTS, pages 374-381, 2006.
22. K. Mikolajczyk and C. Schmid. A performance evaluation of local descriptors. IEEE PAMI, 27(10):1615-1630, October 2005.
23. S. Nath and A. Kansal. Flashdb: dynamic self-tuning database for nand flash. In IPSN, pages 410-419, 2007.
24. D. Nister and H. Stewenius. Scalable recognition with a vocabulary tree. In CVPR, pages 2161-2168, 2006.
25. J. Philbin, O. Chum, M. Isard, J. Sivic, and A. Zisserman. Object retrieval with large vocabularies and fast spatial matching. In CVPR, 2007.
26. S. Reddy, A. Parker, J. Hyman, J. Burke, D. Estrin, and M. Hansen. Image browsing, processing, and clustering for participatory sensing: Lessons from a dietsense prototype. In EmNets, 2007.
27. http://vision.ucla.edu/~vedaldi/code/siftpp/siftpp.html. SIFT++: A lightweight C++ implementation of SIFT.
28. A. Silberstein, R. Braynard, C. Ellis, K. Munagala, and J. Yang. A sampling-based approach to optimizing top-k queries in sensor networks. In ICDE, page 68, 2006.
29. A. Silberstein, K. Munagala, and J. Yang. Energy-efficient monitoring of extreme values in sensor networks. In ACM SIGMOD, pages 157-168, 2006.
30. J. Sivic and A. Zisserman. Video google: A text retrieval approach to object matching in videos. In ICCV, pages 1470-1477, 2003.
31. C. C. Tan, B. Sheng, H. Wang, and Q. Li. Microsearch: When search engines meet small devices. In Pervasive, pages 93-110, 2008.
32. H. Wang, C. C. Tan, and Q. Li. Snoogle: A search engine for physical world. In IEEE Infocom, 2008.
33. D. Zeinalipour-Yazti, S. Lin, V. Kalogeraki, D. Gunopulos, and W. Najjar. MicroHash: An efficient index structure for flash-based sensor devices. In USENIX FAST, 2005.