Interest groups and efficient design of the Clean Development Mechanism under the Kyoto Protocol

International Journal of Sustainable Development

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 24-42

  Michaelowa, Axel ^a   Dutschke, Michael ^b  

^a Hamburg Institute for Economic Research ^*  (France)

^b Hamburgisches Welt Wirtschafts Archiv   (Germany)

Author keywords

activities implemented jointly; Clean Development Mechanism; emissions trading; Kyoto Protocol

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866490618     PISSN: 09601406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJSD.1998.004207     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Agarwal, A. and Narain, S. (1991) Global Warming in an Unequal World, New Delhi.
2. Byrne, J., Wang, Y.-D., Lee, H. and Kim, J.-D. (1998) ‘An equity- and sustainability-based policy response to global climate change,’ Energy Policy, Vol. 26, pp.335–343.
3. Ekins, P. (1996) ‘How large a carbon tax is justified by the secondary benefits of C02 abatement,’ Resource and Energy Economics, Vol. 18, pp.161–187.
4. Global Commons Institute (1997) Contraction and Convergence: Proposals for a Climate Change Protocol, Kyoto.
5. Global Environment Facility (1997) Quarterly Operational Report, June 1997, Washington.
6. Hanisch, T., (1991) ‘Joint implementation of commitments to curb climate change’, CICERO Policy Note 1991:2, Oslo.
7. Hayes, P. and Smith, K. (1993) The Global Greenhouse Regime: Who Pays?, Tokyo.
8. Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee for a Framework Convention on Climate Change (1993) Matters relating to commitments - criteria for Joint Implementation, Comments from member states on criteria for Joint Implementation, A/AC.237/Misc.33 and Add., Genf.
9. Lee, R., Kahn, J. R., Marland, G., Russell, M., Shallcross, K. and Wilbanks, T.J. (1997) Understanding Concerns about Joint Implementation, Knoxville.
10. Michaelowa, A. (1997) ‘Considering externalities in crediting of Joint Implementation,’ in Janssen, J. (Editor) Joint Implementation, protecting the climate, maximizing joint benefits, IWO Discussion Paper No. 49, St. Gallen, pp.15–19.
11. Michaelowa, A. and Dutschke, M. (1997) ‘Joint Implementation as development policy - the case of Costa Rica’, HWWA Discussion Paper No. 49, Hamburg.
12. Michaelowa, A. and Schmidt, H. (1997) ‘A dynamic crediting regime for Joint Implementation to foster innovation in the long term’, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Vol. 2, pp.45–56.
13. Mintzer, I. (1994a) ‘Institutional options and operational challenges in the management of a Joint Implementation regime’, in Ramakrishna, K. (Editor) Criteria for Joint Implementation under the Framework Convention on Climate Change, Woods Hole Research Center, pp.41–50.
14. Newcombe, K. and deLucia, R. (1993) ‘Mobilising private capital against global warming: a business concept and policy issues’, discussion draft, Global Environment Facility, Washington DC.
15. Rada, J.F. (1998) Why Choose the Costa Rican CTOs?, Geneva.
16. Sanhueza, E. Van Hauwermeiren, S. and De Wei, B. (1994) Joint Implementation: conditions for a fair mechanism, Instituto de ecologia politica, Santiago, Chile.
17. Sari, A. (1998) On equity and developing country participation’, paper presented at the workshop ‘Dealing with carbon credits after Kyoto’, Callantsoog, the Netherlands 28-29 May.
18. Selrod, R. and Torvanger, A. (1994) ‘What might be minimum requirements for making the mechanism of Joint Implementation under the Climate Convention credible and operational’, paper presented at the CICERO and TERI workshop in NewDelhi, 21-23 January.
19. UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (1997) Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, FCCC/CP/L.7/Add. 1, Kyoto.
20. UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (1995b) Report of the Conference of the Parties on its first session, held at Berlin from 28 March to 7 April 1995, Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its first session, FCCC/CP/1995/7/Add. 1, Genf.