Cuts, collaboration and creativity

Public Money and Management

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 401-408

  Lowndes, Vivien ^a   Squires, Sharon ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b Sheffield First Partnership ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Austerity; collaboration; cuts; local governance; partnership

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866464150     PISSN: 09540962     EISSN: 14679302     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2012.728779     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Andrews, R. and Entwistle, T. 2010. Does crosssectoral partnership deliver?. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20: 679-701.
2. Ansell, C. and Gash, A. 2007. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4): 543-571.
3. Barker, R. 2011. Big societies, little platoons and the problems with pluralism. Political Quarterly, 82(1): 50-55.
4. Bichard, M. 2011. "Bringing down the boundaries". In A Problem Shared?, Edited by: Grace, C. and Mellish, P. London: SFI.
5. Cabinet Office. 2011. Unlocking Growth in Cities London
6. Chapman, R. and Lowndes, V. 2009. Accountable, authorized or authentic? What do 'faith representatives' offer urban governance?. Public Money & Management, 29(6): 371-378.
7. Choi, C. and Choi, S. 2012. Collaborative partnerships and crime in disorganized communities. Public Administration Review, 77(2): 228-239.
8. Coleman, J. 1994. Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge: Belknap Press.
9. DCLG. 2011. Community Budgets Prospectus London
10. Denscombe, M. 2003. The Good Research Guide, Maidenhead: Open University Press.
11. Durose, C. and Rees, J. 2012. The rise and fall of neighbourhood in the New Labour era. Policy & Politics, 40(1): 38-54.
12. Flinders, M. and Moon, D. 2011. The problem of letting go. Local Economy, 26(8): 652-662.
13. Geddes, M. 2006. Partnership and the limits to governance in England. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(1): 76-97.
14. Goddard, J. 2009. Reinventing the Civic University, London: NESTA.
15. Lowndes, V. and Pratchett, L. 2012. Local governance under the coalition government: austerity, localism and the 'big society'. Local Government Studies, 38(1): 1-20.
16. Lowndes, V. and Skelcher, C. 1998. The dynamics of multi-organizational partnerships: an analysis of changing modes of governance. Public Administration, 76(2): 313-333.
17. Marsh, D. 2010. "Meta-theoretical issues". In Theory and Methods in Political Science, Edited by: Marsh, D. and Stoker, G. London: Palgrave.
18. McKinlay, F. 2011. "Focusing on the needs of communities". In A Problem Shared?, Edited by: Grace, C. and Mellish, P. London: SFI.
19. Mouffe, C. 2000. The Democratic Paradox, London: Verso.
20. Saward, M. 2010. The Representative Claim, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Smith, M. 2010. From big government to big society. Parliamentary Affairs, 63(4): 818-833.
22. Stafford, B. and Duffy, D. 2009. Review of Evidence on the Impact of Economic Downturn on Disadvantaged Groups, London: DWP.
23. Steele, J. and Hampton, K. 2005. Unblocking Creativity in Public Services, London: OPM.
24. Sullivan, H. and Skelcher, C. 2002. Working Across Boundaries, London: Palgrave.
25. Taylor-Gooby, P. and Stoker, G. 2011. The coalition programme: a new vision for Britain or politics as usual?. The Political Quarterly, 82(1): 4-15.
26. Warwick Commission. 2012. Elected Mayors and City Leadership, Warwick: University of Warwick.
27. Wimbush, E. 2011. Implementing an outcomes approach to public management and accountability in the UK. Public Money & Management, 31(3): 211-218.