In 'The Best Interests of the Child': Critical Reflections on an Overused Construct

Children Australia

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 12-17

  Hansen, Patricia ^a   Ainsworth, Frank ^b  

^a AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

best interests of the child; foster care outcomes; kinship care outcomes; law

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866462443     PISSN: 10350772     EISSN: 20497776     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1035077200907570     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ainsworth, F., & Hansen, P. (2008). Children in out-of-home care: What drives the increase in admissions and how to make a change? Children Australia, 33(4), 13–20.
2. Australian Institute for Health and Welfare. (2010). Child protection Australia 2008–09. Canberra, Australia: Author.
3. Australian Institute for Health and Welfare. (2009). Juvenile justice in Australia 2007–08. Canberra: Author.
4. Barth, R., & Lloyd, C. (2010). Five-year developmental outcomes for young children in foster care, returned home, or adopted. In E. Fernandez & R. Barth (Eds.), How does foster care work? (pp. 47–62). London: Jessica Kingsley.
5. Boston Consulting Group. (2010). NSW out of home care review. Discussion of NGO model. Sydney: Australia. Retrieved July 1, 2010 from http://www.acwa.asn.au
6. Cashmore, J., & Paxman, M. (1996). Wards leaving care: Longitudinal study. Sydney, Australia: Department of Community Services.
7. Cashmore, J., & Paxman, M. (2006). Wards leaving care. Follow up five years on. Children Australia, 31(3), 18–25.
8. Chamberlain, P. (2003). Treating chronic juvenile offenders. Advances made through the Oregon multidimensional treatment foster care model. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
9. Courtney, M.E., Dworsky, A., Lee, J.S., & Raap, M. (2010). Midwest evaluation of adult functioning of former foster youth: Outcomes at aged 23 and 24. Chicago, IL: Chapin Hall.
10. Courtney, M.E., Terao, S., & Bost, N. (2004). Midwest evaluation of adult functioning of former foster youth: Conditions of youth preparing to leave state care. Executive summary. Chicago, IL: Chapin Hall.
11. Dickey, A. (1997). Family Law (3rd ed.). North Ryde, Australia: The Law Book Company.
12. Doyle, J.J. (2007). Child protection and child outcomes: Measuring the effect of foster care. The American Economic Review, 97(3), 1583–1610.
13. Doyle, J.J. (2008). Child protection and adult crime: Using investigator assignment to estimate causal effects of foster care. Journal of Political Economy, 116(41), 746–770.
14. Elster, J. (1989). Solomonic judgements. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Frederick, J., & Goddard, C. (2006). Pathways to and from state care. The experience of eight young people. Children Australia, 31(3), 34–41.
16. Freeman, M. (2010).The best interests of the child? Is the best interests of the child in the best interests of children? In M. Freeman, Family values and family justice (pp. 77–105) Ashgate, UK: Farnham.
17. Fitzpatrick, M., & Reeve, P. (2003). Grandparents’ raising grandchildren: A new class of disadvantaged Australians. Family Matters, 66, 54–57.
18. Goldstein, J., Freud, A., & Solnit, A.J. (1973). Beyond the best interests of the child. New York: Free Press.
19. Goldstein, J., Freud, A., Burlingham, D., & Solnit, A.J. (1979). Before the best interest of the child. New York: Free Press.
20. Goldstein, J., Freud, A., Solnit, A.J., & Golstein, S. (1986). In the best interest of the child New York: Free Press.
21. Goldstein, J., Solnit, A.J., Golstein, S., with Freud, A. (1996). The best interest of the child. The least detrimental alternative. New York: Free Press.
22. Hansen, P., & Ainsworth, F. (2009). The ‘best interests of the child’ thesis: Some thoughts from Australia. International Journal of Social Welfare, 18, 431–439.
23. Jonhson-Reid, M., & Barth, R.P. (2000a). From maltreatment report to juvenile incarceration: The role of child welfare services, Child Abuse and Neglect, 24(4), 505–520.
24. Jonhson-Reid, M., & Barth, R.P. (2000b). From placement to prison: The path to adolescent incarceration from child welfare supervised foster or group care. Children and Youth Services Review, 22(7), 483–516.
25. Joslin, D. (2009). Custodial grandparent empowerment: Models of practice. Families in Society, 90(2), 196–204.
26. Kang, H. (2007). Theoretical perspectives for child welfare practice on kinship foster care. Families in Society, 88(4), 575–582.
27. Kessler, R.C., Percora, P.J., Williams J., Hiripi E., O’Brien, K., English, D., White, J., Zerbe, R., Downs, A.C., Plotnick, R., Hwang, I., & Sampson, N.A. (2008). Effects of enhanced foster care on the long-term physical and mental health of foster care alumni. Archive of General Psychiatry. 65(6), 625–633.
28. Lawrence, C.R., Carlson, E.A., & Egeland, B. (2006). The impact of foster care on development. Development and Psychopathology, 18(1), 57–76.
29. Parker, S., Parkinson, P., & Behrens, J. (1999). Australian family law in context (2nd ed.). Pyrmont, Australia: LBC Information Services.
30. Paton, N. (2003). The effects of parental drug use—children in kinship care: A review of the literature. Melbourne, Australia: Mirabel Foundation.
31. Paton, N. (2004). Parental drug use: A recent phenomenon. Melbourne, Australia: Mirabel Foundation.
32. Reece, H. (2010). The paramountcy principle. Consensus or construct? In E. Buss & M. Maclean (Eds.), The law and child development (pp. 105–142). Ashgate, UK: Farnham.
33. Winokur, M.A., Crawford, G.A., Longobardi, R.C., & Valentine, D.P. (2008). Matched comparison of children in kinship care and foster care on child welfare outcomes. Families in Society, 89(3), 338–346.
34. Wise, S., Pollock, P., Mitchell, G., Argus, C., & Farquhar, P. (2010). Ciao. Care system impacts on academic outcome. Melbourne, Australia: Anglicare Victoria/Wesley Mission Victoria.
35. Yardley, A., Mason, J., & Watson, E. (2009). Kinship care in NSW: Finding a way forward. Sydney, Australia: Social Justice Social Change Research Centre, University of Western Sydney.
36. Zito, F. (2010). The child best interests … or near enough? A lawyer’s perspective. Children Australia, 35(2), 48–51.