Governing biological material at the intersection of care and research: The use of dried blood spots for biobanking

Croatian Medical Journal

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 390-397

  Douglas, Conor M W ^a   van El, Carla G ^a   Faulkner, Alex ^b   Cornel, Martina C ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY SCREENING; BLOOD SAMPLING; BLOOD STORAGE; CONGENITAL HYPOTHYROIDISM; CRYOPRESERVATION; CYSTIC FIBROSIS; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; DRIED BLOOD SPOT TESTING; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; ETHICAL DECISION MAKING; GENOMICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METABOLIC DISORDER; NETHERLANDS; NEWBORN SCREENING; PARENT; PHENYLKETONURIA; PRIVACY; PUBLIC OPINION; PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP; QUALITY CONTROL; RESEARCH ETHICS; SHELF LIFE; SICKLE CELL ANEMIA;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; BLOOD BANKS; BLOOD SPECIMEN COLLECTION; CONFIDENTIALITY; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFORMED CONSENT; NEONATAL SCREENING; NETHERLANDS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;

EID: 84866459264     PISSN: 03539504     EISSN: 13328166     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2012.53.390     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Therrell BL, Hannon WH, Pass KA, Lorey F, Eckman J, et al. Guidelines for the retention, storage, and use of residual dried blood spot samples after newborn screening analysis: Statement of the Council of Regional Networks for Genetic Services. Biochem Mol Med. 1996;57:116-24.
2. Kharaboyan L, Avard D, Knoppers BM. Storing newborn blood spots: modern controversies. JLME. 2004;32:741-8.
3. Loeber JG, Burgard B, Cornel MC, Rigter T, Weinreich SS, Rupp K. Newborn screening programmes in Europe; arguments and efforts regarding harmonization. Part 1 - from blood spot to screening result. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2012;35:603-11.
4. Couzin-Frankel J. Science gold mine, ethical minefield. Science. 2009;324:166-8.
5. Roser MA. State sued over trading and selling infant blood spots. New Statesman. 2010;(December):8.
6. Carmichael M. A spot of trouble. Nature. 2011;475:156-8.
7. Information on stored newborn screening cards. Available from: http://www.hse.ie/eng/services/healthpromotion/newbornscreening/newbornbloodspotscreening/nscs.html. Accessed: August 16, 2012.
8. Metzler I, Webster A. Bio-objects and their boundaries: governing matters at the intersection of society, politics, and science. Croat Med J. 2011;52:648-50.
9. Tamminen S. Still life? Frozen gametes, national gene banks and re-configuration of animality. In: Vermeulen N, Tamminen S, Webster A, editors. Bio-objects life if in the 21st century. Farnham (UK): Ashgate; 2012. p.203-18.
10. Chrupek M, Siipi H, Martinelli L. Bio-objects as "boundary crawlers:" the case of microRNAs. Croat Med J. 2012;53:285-8.
11. Hansen J, Ingrid Metzler I. Governing bio-objects: a research agenda. Croat Med J. 2012;53:80-2.
12. Ten Kate LP, Loeber JG, de Knijf P, Bovenberg JA. Trends in our genes [in Dutch]. Med Contact (Bussum). 2005;60:1767-9.
13. Hollegaard MV, Grauholm J, Borglum A, Nyegaard M, Norgaard-Pedersen B, Orntoft T, et al. Genome-wide scans using archived neonatal dried blood spot. BMC Genomics. 2009;10:297.
14. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen (KNAW). Multifactorial disorders in the genomics era [in Dutch]. Amsterdam: KNAW; 2006.
15. Geesink I, Steegers C. Further use further investigated - control of body material [in Dutch]. Den Haag (the Netherlands): Rathenau Instituut; 2009.
16. Dutch Forum for Biotechnology and Genetics 2010. Letter to the RIVM regarding heel prick card storage. Available from: http://www.forumbg.nl/files/2010-236pdf.doc.pdf. Accessed: August 16, 2012.
17. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM). Letter of response to the Forum Biotechnologie & Genetica regarding heel prick card storage 2010. Available from: http://www.forumbg.nl/files/2010-251pdf.pdf. Accessed: August 16, 2012.
18. Wjst M. Caught you: Threats to confidentiality due to the public release of large-scale genetic data sets. BMC Med Ethics. 2010;11:21.
19. Ministry of Health (Canada). Guidance document - definitions for genomic biomarkers, pharmacogenomics, pharmacogenetics, genomic data and sample coding categories. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada; 2008.
20. Generation R. Available from: http://www.generationr.nl/. Accessed: August 16, 2012.
21. Michopoulos F, Theodoridis G, Smith C, Wilson ID. Metabolite profiles from dried blood spots for metabonomic studies using UPLC combined with orthogonal acceleration ToF-MS: effects of different papers and sample storage stability. Bioanalysis. 2011;3:2757-67.
22. Knoppers BM, Deschenes M, Zawati MH, Tasse AM. Population studies: return of research results and incidental findings Policy Statement. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012 Jul 11. [Epub ahead of print]
23. O'Doherty KC, Burgess MM, Edwards K, Gallagher RP, Hawkins AK, Kaye J, et al. From consent to institutions: designing adaptive governance for genomic biobanks. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73:367-74.
24. Detmar S, Hosli E, Dijkstra N, Nijsingh N, Rijnders M, Verweij M. Information and informed consent for neonatal screening: opinions and preferences of parents. Birth. 2007;34:238-44.
25. Hens K, Van El CE, Borry P, Cambon-Thomsen A, Cornel MC, Forzano F, et al. Developing a policy for paediatric biobanks: principles for good practice. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012 Jun 20. [Epub ahead of print]
26. Brown N, Faulkner A, Kent J, Michael M. Regulating hybrids: 'making a mess' and 'cleaning up' in tissue engineering and transpecies transplantation. Soc Theory Health. 2006;1:1-24.
27. Rial-Sebbag E, Cambon-Thomsen A. Emergence of biobanks in the legal landscape: Towards a new model of governance. J Law Soc. 2012;39:113-30.
28. Cornel MC. Crossing the boundary between research and health care: P3G policy statement on return of results from population studies. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012 Jul 25. [Epub ahead of print]
29. Holmberg T, Schwennesen N, Webster A. Bio-objects and the bio-objectification process. Croat Med J. 2011;52:740-2.