Using patient perceptions of relative benefit and enjoyment to assess auditory training

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

Volumn 23, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 623-634

  Tye Murray, Nancy ^a   Sommers, Mitchell S ^b   Mauze, Elizabeth ^a   Schroy, Catherine ^a   Barcroft, Joe ^b   Spehar, Brent ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory training; Cochlear implants; Hearing aids; Hearing loss; Self assessment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDIOLOGIST ATTITUDE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY REHABILITATION; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPREHENSION; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; HEARING AID; HEARING LOSS; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; LEARNING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; TRAINING; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF-ASSESSMENT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84866458835     PISSN: 10500545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.23.8.7     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Artistico D, Cervone D, Pezzuti L. (2003) Perceived self-efficacy and everyday problem solving among young and older adults. Psychol Aging 18:68-79. (Pubitemid 36293046)
2. Bandura A. (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84:191-215.
3. Bandura A. (1982) The assessment and predictive generality of self-percepts of efficacy. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 13:195-199.
4. Baxter LA. (1991) Content analysis. In: Montgomery BM, Duck S, eds. Studying Interpersonal Interaction. New York: The Guilford Press, 239-254.
5. Bode DL, Oyer HJ. (1970) Auditory training and speech discrimination. J Speech Hear Res 13:839-855.
6. Burk MH, Humes LE. (2008) Effects of long-term training on aided speech-recognition performance in noise in older adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res 51:759-771. (Pubitemid 351962122)
7. Burk MH, Humes LE, Amos NE, Strauser LE. (2006) Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners. Ear Hear 27:263-278. (Pubitemid 44350550)
8. Carhart R. (1960) Auditory Training. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
9. Cohen J. (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hilldale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associated.
10. Cox RM, Alexander GC. (1995) The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit. Ear Hear 16:176-186.
11. Cox RM, Gilmore C. (1990) Development of the Profile of Hearing Aid Performance (PHAP). J Speech Hear Res 33:343-357. (Pubitemid 20200328)
12. Demorest ME, Erdman SA. (1987) Development of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. J Speech Hear Disord 52:129-143. (Pubitemid 17082799)
13. Gatehouse S. (1999) A self-report outcome measure for the evaluation of hearing aid fittings and services. Health Bull (Edinb) 57:424-436.
14. Gil D, Iorio MC. (2010) Formal auditory training in adult hearing aid users. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 65:165-174.
15. Giolas TG, Owens E, Lamb SH, Schubert ED. (1979) Hearing Performance Inventory. J Speech Hear Disord 44:169-195. (Pubitemid 9188958)
16. Glaser BG. (1998) Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
17. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. (2004) Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 24:105-112. (Pubitemid 38232767)
18. Kricos P, Holmes AE. (1996) Efficacy of audiologic rehabilitation for older adults. J Am Acad Audiol 7:219-229.
19. Kricos P, Holmes AE, Doyle DA. (1992) Efficacy of a communication training program for hearing-impaired elderly adults. J Acad Rehabil Audiol 25:69-80.
20. Krippendorff K. (1980) Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. London, England: Sage Publications.
21. Lansing CR, Davis JM. (1988) Early versus delayed speech perception training for adult cochlear implant users: initial results. J Acad Rehabil Audiol 21:29-41.
22. Moog JS, Biedenstein JJ, Davidson LS. (1995) Speech Perception Instructional Curriculum and Evaluation. St. Louis, MO: Central Institute for the Deaf.
23. Morris CD, Bransford JD, Franks JJ. (1977) Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 16:519-533.
24. Newman CW, Weinstein BE. (1988) The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly as a measure of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 9:81-85.
25. Sherwood NE, Martinson BC, Crain AL, Hayes MG, Pronk NP, O'Connor PJ. (2008) A new approach to physical activity maintenance: rationale, design, and baseline data from the Keep Active Minnesota Trial. BMC Geriatr 8:17. doi:10.1186/1471-2318-8-17.
26. Smaldino S, Smaldino J. (1988) The influence of aural rehabilitation and cognitive style discourse on the perception of hearing handicap. J Acad Rehabil Audiol 21:57-64.
27. Smith SL, West RL. (2006) Hearing aid self-efficacy of new and experienced hearing aid users. Semin Hear 27:325-329. (Pubitemid 44899803)
28. Stout G, Windle J. (1992) Developmental Approach to Successful Listening-Revised (DASL). Englewood, CO: Resource Point.
29. Strecher VJ, DeVellis BM, Becker MH, Rosenstock IM. (1986) The role of self-efficacy in achieving health behavior change. Health Educ Q 13:73-92.
30. Sweetow R, Palmer CV. (2005) Efficacy of individual auditory training in adults: a systematic review of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol 16:494-504. (Pubitemid 43375795)
31. Sweetow RW, Sabes JH. (2010) Auditory training and challenges associated with participation and compliance. J Am Acad Audiol 21:586-593.
32. Tye-Murray N. (2009) Foundations of Aural Rehabilitation: Children, Adults, and Their Family Members. 3rd ed. Clifton Park, NY: Cengage Learning.
33. Weinstein BE, Spitzer JB, Ventry IM. (1986) Test-retest reliability of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly. Ear Hear 7: 295-299. (Pubitemid 17168730)